[CLOSING] GHash.IO mining pool official page - page 37.

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Quote from: ernie- on July 13, 2014, 01:49:34 AM

Quote from: ALToids on July 13, 2014, 01:38:37 AM

Perhaps the puppeteer who was playing the strings to keep the price elevated decided it was time to take his profit? I mean with the maintenance, trading fees, withdrawal fee, and exorbitant cost cex GHs were probably the most overpriced junk out there.

So in other words you have no idea.

I thought it might have been the diff increase.

So in other words you can't understand basic economics. Price volatility at CEX depends on demand not on logic (if it depended on logic nobody would lose money there).

Here, I'll give you Occam's razor - the price was overinflated and a large holder decided to dump his assets.

ernie-

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: ALToids on July 13, 2014, 01:38:37 AM

Perhaps the puppeteer who was playing the strings to keep the price elevated decided it was time to take his profit? I mean with the maintenance, trading fees, withdrawal fee, and exorbitant cost cex GHs were probably the most overpriced junk out there.

So in other words you have no idea.

I thought it might have been the diff increase.

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

Quote from: ernie- on July 11, 2014, 10:14:25 PM

Quote from: Bitsaurus on July 11, 2014, 05:02:36 PM

In an industry where pool ops getting love/respect from the community for their transparency and communication ghash.io has decided to go the other way and try to hide what's going on behind the curtain. Come on ghash.io, release your API

What's so important about an API? What are you trying to achieve with it? I run trade bots con cex.io API without any problems.

I see the market for GHS has collapsed today, any ideas what happened?

Perhaps the puppeteer who was playing the strings to keep the price elevated decided it was time to take his profit? I mean with the maintenance, trading fees, withdrawal fee, and exorbitant cost cex GHs were probably the most overpriced junk out there.

Bitcoinbikers

full member

Activity: 177

Merit: 100

Now that's a can do attitude!

Do GHash.io do cloud mining? and is it worth it?

ernie-

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bitsaurus on July 11, 2014, 05:02:36 PM

In an industry where pool ops getting love/respect from the community for their transparency and communication ghash.io has decided to go the other way and try to hide what's going on behind the curtain. Come on ghash.io, release your API

What's so important about an API? What are you trying to achieve with it? I run trade bots con cex.io API without any problems.

I see the market for GHS has collapsed today, any ideas what happened?

Bitsaurus

hero member

Activity: 873

Merit: 1007

In an industry where pool ops getting love/respect from the community for their transparency and communication ghash.io has decided to go the other way and try to hide what's going on behind the curtain. Come on ghash.io, release your API

PatMan

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....

Quote from: organofcorti on July 11, 2014, 01:33:51 AM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 10, 2014, 11:47:56 PM

Jeffrey Smith: The hashing power of CEX.IO constitutes 25 percent of GHash.IO total hash rate. The rest are independent miners.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/bitcoin-mining-pool-ghash-io-is-unapologetic-risk-theoretical-51-attack/2014/06/12

Well if that's correct I don't see why they're so much against providing an API that would allow everyone to monitor the situation instead waiting for Jeffrey Smith to make a statement. Plenty of pools do it.

Absolutely. Although we all know the reason why they're against it.

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: SecureErase on July 10, 2014, 11:47:56 PM

Jeffrey Smith: The hashing power of CEX.IO constitutes 25 percent of GHash.IO total hash rate. The rest are independent miners.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/bitcoin-mining-pool-ghash-io-is-unapologetic-risk-theoretical-51-attack/2014/06/12

Well if that's correct I don't see why they're so much against providing an API that would allow everyone to monitor the situation instead waiting for Jeffrey Smith to make a statement. Plenty of pools do it.

SecureErase

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

Quote from: dropt on July 10, 2014, 09:46:00 AM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 10, 2014, 02:44:25 AM

Never heard of Google then "Given that 25% of Ghash.io’s hashing power (upwards of 10% of the total network hashrate) is from Cex.io".......sinks that putt lots of clapping. There are quotes out there to that effect.

Oh, so now the onus is on me to prove your claims, got it. The point was you got riled up for someone's unsubtantiated claims then presented your own unsubstantiated claims as the "real" values.

And now did you not only allegedly go to Google and find that information, you again failed to provide your citation. Nice. So 25% for CEX.IO is it? Any more information as to how much of GHASH is Bitfury's conglomerate of private pools? Or maybe it would be easier to find out what percentage of their HR is not physically held by Bitfury/CEX operations. As for "quotes"...

Quote

The HR of GHASH.IO is 99% physically owned and controlled by the Bitfury/CEX conglomerates.

Now let's just sit back and wait for Google to index this post and then we can all use the above as proof that GHASH is only 1% miners and 99% one entitiy.

Ha ha, OK I do see the irony in me refuting unsubstantiated claims with my own unsubstantiated claim Wink

Although your quote shows zero results in Google.

CCN: What percentage of ghash.io’s hashing power is from cex.io? What percentage from other miners?

Jeffrey Smith: The hashing power of CEX.IO constitutes 25 percent of GHash.IO total hash rate. The rest are independent miners.

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/bitcoin-mining-pool-ghash-io-is-unapologetic-risk-theoretical-51-attack/2014/06/12

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: SecureErase on July 10, 2014, 02:44:25 AM

Quote from: dropt on July 09, 2014, 12:04:47 PM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

You need to fact check a bit before making grand statements. Most of their mining power comes from independent miners. Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.
The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

Complains about lack of fact checking, fails to provide citations in retort.

*Golf Clap*

Never heard of Google then "Given that 25% of Ghash.io’s hashing power (upwards of 10% of the total network hashrate) is from Cex.io".......sinks that putt lots of clapping. There are quotes out there to that effect.

Can you link to a post where this is claimed by someone from an executive position in GHash.IO?

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SecureErase on July 10, 2014, 02:44:25 AM

Never heard of Google then "Given that 25% of Ghash.io’s hashing power (upwards of 10% of the total network hashrate) is from Cex.io".......sinks that putt lots of clapping. There are quotes out there to that effect.

Oh, so now the onus is on me to prove your claims, got it. The point was you got riled up for someone's unsubtantiated claims then presented your own unsubstantiated claims as the "real" values.

And now did you not only allegedly go to Google and find that information, you again failed to provide your citation. Nice. So 25% for CEX.IO is it? Any more information as to how much of GHASH is Bitfury's conglomerate of private pools? Or maybe it would be easier to find out what percentage of their HR is not physically held by Bitfury/CEX operations. As for "quotes"...

Quote

The HR of GHASH.IO is 99% physically owned and controlled by the Bitfury/CEX conglomerates.

Now let's just sit back and wait for Google to index this post and then we can all use the above as proof that GHASH is only 1% miners and 99% one entitiy.

ernie-

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: thatguy42 on July 10, 2014, 01:36:32 AM

Quote from: organofcorti on July 09, 2014, 10:02:09 PM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

You might becorrect. You might not be correct. We have no way of knowing, because GHash.IO is less transparent than many other pools.

The problem is the sickness of greed. Sooner or later an entity will overtly or secretly gain 51% for greedy purposes.

Perhaps, after getting 2 blocks in a row, if the same entity gets a third block; that block is given to, a random mining entity, that has never gotten a block.
Could something like that decentralize enough ?

Sound like nonsense to me, the chance of something like a double spend attack is almost identical for 49% vs 51% there is even a chance if you have only 10% of the net hash you can have a double spend attack, it's just not all that likely to succeed, but there still is a chance. Most of the time ghash.io runs well below 40% of the net hash, which is way off this psychological 51% that everyone seems to get so excited about.

There are doezen of coins out there where 1 pool has over 70-80% of the net hash and life goes on.

SecureErase

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

Quote from: dropt on July 09, 2014, 12:04:47 PM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

You need to fact check a bit before making grand statements. Most of their mining power comes from independent miners. Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.
The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

Complains about lack of fact checking, fails to provide citations in retort.

*Golf Clap*

Never heard of Google then "Given that 25% of Ghash.io’s hashing power (upwards of 10% of the total network hashrate) is from Cex.io".......sinks that putt lots of clapping. There are quotes out there to that effect.

thatguy42

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: organofcorti on July 09, 2014, 10:02:09 PM

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

You might becorrect. You might not be correct. We have no way of knowing, because GHash.IO is less transparent than many other pools.

The problem is the sickness of greed. Sooner or later an entity will overtly or secretly gain 51% for greedy purposes.

Perhaps, after getting 2 blocks in a row, if the same entity gets a third block; that block is given to, a random mining entity, that has never gotten a block.
Could something like that decentralize enough ?

organofcorti

donator

Activity: 2058

Merit: 1007

Poor impulse control.

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

You need to fact check a bit before making grand statements. Most of their mining power comes from independent miners. Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.
The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

You might becorrect. You might not be correct. We have no way of knowing, because GHash.IO is less transparent than many other pools.

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

You need to fact check a bit before making grand statements. Most of their mining power comes from independent miners. Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.
The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

Complains about lack of fact checking, fails to provide citations in retort.

*Golf Clap*

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.

If only that were true that would be great. It appears they are attempting to obscure their hashrate by solo mining with some of it. Also many of their independent miners are using their cloud mining services which said miners have no control over that hashrate.

Your right in that I haven't really researched how much hash rate is really theirs on their hardware on the network. But I have no idea how to realistically or accurately do that. I, like most people, go by the pie chart on blockchain.info.

Quote from: SecureErase on July 09, 2014, 11:07:33 AM

The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

It's not a weakness! Its the nature of Bitcoin. That is the way hashing entities "vote" to make changes.

Right now ghashio is approaching the power to "vote" with no input from others. That makes allot of people nervous since they think any fork they do will be bad for everyone else, maybe it will maybe it won't, maybe ghasio will never attempt to create a hard fork.

SecureErase

member

Activity: 83

Merit: 10

[quote author=os2sam link=topic=627111.msg7753340#msg7753340 date=1404916498

You don't need any conference to figure out a "solution" to a problem you created. All you need to do is sell your ASIC hardware instead of hording it and mining on it for yourself. Simple. You don't need to liquidate all of your hardware just enough to maintain a more reasonable percentage of the overall networks hash rate, around 10 to 15%.

Having half the network being your hardware under your control and is decreasing confidence in Bitcoin and will decrease your profits. So selling off your hardware to a more reasonable level is not only good for the network and all Bitcoiner's, but is also good for you. It's not brain surgery, just common sense. No conference needed.

[/quote]
You need to fact check a bit before making grand statements. Most of their mining power comes from independent miners. Their hardware is about 30% of their pool size let's say 20 Peta hash max or about 16% of the total hashing power of 120 Peta hash. Oh look it is already at your requested reasonable percentage level.
The Bitcoin protocol has a weakness with the 51% issue, having the market players discuss it as an industry is the way to find a long term solution.

dropt

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

Quote from: os2sam on July 09, 2014, 09:34:58 AM

You don't need any conference to figure out a "solution" to a problem you created. All you need to do is sell your ASIC hardware instead of hording it and mining on it for yourself. Simple. You don't need to liquidate all of your hardware just enough to maintain a more reasonable percentage of the overall networks hash rate, around 10 to 15%.

INB4 "We tried, but no one's buying our hardware (at $10/GH)."

Quote

Having half the network being your hardware under your control and is decreasing confidence in Bitcoin and will decrease your profits. So selling off your hardware to a more reasonable level is not only good for the network and all Bitcoiner's, but is also good for you. It's not brain surgery, just common sense. No conference needed.

Which is why I quite like BITMAIN's model. They've got a fairly sizeable private farm, but they are also the market leader when it comes to sales priced appropriately for the market. Even when Bitfury and Co. were selling to end-users their pricing was out there.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: ghash.io on July 09, 2014, 06:42:05 AM

CEX.IO & GHash.IO today host a roundtable ahead of Coinsummit London Conference

Attendees will include the Bitcoin Foundation and mining industry representatives. The aim to collectively discuss solutions to the Bitcoin 51% issue.

https://mobile.twitter.com/cex_io/status/486805822312562688/photo/1

You don't need any conference to figure out a "solution" to a problem you created. All you need to do is sell your ASIC hardware instead of hording it and mining on it for yourself. Simple. You don't need to liquidate all of your hardware just enough to maintain a more reasonable percentage of the overall networks hash rate, around 10 to 15%.

Having half the network being your hardware under your control and is decreasing confidence in Bitcoin and will decrease your profits. So selling off your hardware to a more reasonable level is not only good for the network and all Bitcoiner's, but is also good for you. It's not brain surgery, just common sense. No conference needed.

Topic: [CLOSING] GHash.IO mining pool official page - page 37. (Read 149381 times)