★★ Coinbuilder ★★ | BUILD | In-wallet altcoin generator | Stage 2 soon - page 5.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: tarmi on December 23, 2015, 05:39:34 AM

Quote from: ocminer on December 23, 2015, 05:37:20 AM

Quote from: tarmi on December 23, 2015, 05:33:00 AM

Once we have the visual rebranding ready, members of this community will be given pre-access to the Github to test the coin and verify the builder outputs.

If all goes well, we release the wallet to public from the moment the trusted testers confirm and vouch for it's quality.

Define "trusted members": who do you think is able to test the builder outputs and how, so what are the "specs" that need to be met ?

I'll be happy to add you to the Github

You recognize a good coin source when you look at it.

Ugh sorry - without being negative in any way - but I don't want to be involved at this point - I just wanted to know who you might think of (beside me). I'd recommend gjhiggins : https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/gjhiggins-254673 or, of course, earlz https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/earlz-317881 - not sure if they want to be involved though.

tarmi

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1011

Quote from: ocminer on December 23, 2015, 05:37:20 AM

Quote from: tarmi on December 23, 2015, 05:33:00 AM

Once we have the visual rebranding ready, members of this community will be given pre-access to the Github to test the coin and verify the builder outputs.

If all goes well, we release the wallet to public from the moment the trusted testers confirm and vouch for it's quality.

Define "trusted members": who do you think is able to test the builder outputs and how, so what are the "specs" that need to be met ?

I'll be happy to add you to the Github

You recognize a good coin source when you look at it.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1240

Quote from: tarmi on December 23, 2015, 05:33:00 AM

Once we have the visual rebranding ready, members of this community will be given pre-access to the Github to test the coin and verify the builder outputs.

If all goes well, we release the wallet to public from the moment the trusted testers confirm and vouch for it's quality.

Define "trusted members": who do you think is able to test the builder outputs and how, so what are the "specs" that need to be met ?

tarmi

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1011

Allright, let's end this drama please.

BUILD is not stopping because people force me to pay them money for their reputation.
All this could have happend in PM, but publicly putting pressure seems to do better.

Quote

So it seems that my project near your have a good impact.
But as i said people ask me some guarantee.

Make a guarantee like that means risk reputation, and reputation on this community is all for me.
So i can't do this for free, any risk have a costs, my reputation have a cost Undecided

So, if we are able to decide a "contract" price i can try to look into this project and tells my options to users who ask me, if our partnership is something like "Thanks Sampey for partnership but sorry, no stake and no CAT copies = 0 GAIN" i need to write into the main topic that :
- our collaboration is only based on "20K Stake -> CAT Copy" and nothing more
- that i don't know nothing about this project
- that i don't know anyone of the dev behind this
- that i'm not responsible of anything more than gives CAT copies

Sorry to write you this PM hope you'll understand my position. Thanks

We all know what Sampey's position is now, as he clearly stated from the beginning. He does not vouch for our copies.

Back to business; The wallet is undergoing the latest changements right now.
Once we have the visual rebranding ready, members of this community will be given pre-access to the Github to test the coin and verify the builder outputs.

If all goes well, we release the wallet to public from the moment the trusted testers confirm and vouch for it's quality.

Once the wallet is public, i'll make contact with Sampey again to purchase the licenses.
Do we care at what cost? Not really. Will he confirm the transaction? Yes.

Black*M

newbie

Activity: 39

Merit: 0

When wallet relase ?

Woody20285

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO

Quote from: Cointang on December 22, 2015, 11:43:55 PM

Damn what a shit storm... you guys couldnt handle this in pm? Oh well.. so the ico I bought through ccex, I'm shit out of luck or can we get our btc back?

The exchange holds the BTC so you should get it back. They don't release it to dev. until ICO is complete. Those who sent direct to dev. will need to contact him.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: Cointang on December 22, 2015, 11:43:55 PM

Damn what a shit storm... you guys couldnt handle this in pm? Oh well.. so the ico I bought through ccex, I'm shit out of luck or can we get our btc back?

The check's in the mail. Roll Eyes

Cointang

full member

Activity: 191

Merit: 100

Damn what a shit storm... you guys couldnt handle this in pm? Oh well.. so the ico I bought through ccex, I'm shit out of luck or can we get our btc back?

Woody20285

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO

I believe it was a great idea - a great partnership and the dev. had the best intentions.
But... it required dev. to dig into his pocket with the CAT deal he made. Had he done so
up front, I believe he would have had no problem with the ICO selling well if not selling out.

Many, like me, were probably waiting to see if the CAT licenses were purchased. I would
have jumped on 20,000 build (and not for wallet creation) just for the CAT license.
Then, sold the Build at market 30 or more days down the road.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: GSpgh on December 22, 2015, 10:11:22 PM

launch to (likely) scam in 7 days?

I'm not much into altcoins - is that a record of some sort or not?

You probably should continue to not be much into altcoins. Every altcoin is a long shot. You could probably do better playing Three-card Monte. Trust me, this coin is not a record holder for good or bad ATM.

GSpgh

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 302

launch to (likely) scam in 7 days?

I'm not much into altcoins - is that a record of some sort or not?

Woody20285

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1002

Supporting DMD, ERC & PIO

Quote from: Crypto Enthusiast on December 22, 2015, 08:25:22 PM

You people... to much talk for nothing. You dont give the time to the dev even to release the wallet. If you don't like ico, don't buy, but let him release his project.

I liked the ICO when it was partnered with CAT and it was pure genius.
Get people to buy 20,000 coons and hold for min. 30 days to get the CAT license.
But when he did not honor his agreement with Sampey how can I expect him to
provide the CAT license now at full price.

kevin1234a

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1000

Decentralizing Jesus on the Blockchain

Quote from: bones261 on December 22, 2015, 09:01:00 PM

Well, it appears that I'll be left holding the bag with this one. Cry

Hopefully, the dev can exceed my expectations from here on out.

Me toooooo bud, it wont be a big loss if things goes sideways but i still like this concept. If not tarmi then someone else will do.

NextGenCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: bones261 on December 22, 2015, 09:01:00 PM

Well, it appears that I'll be left holding the bag with this one. Cry

Hopefully, the dev can exceed my expectations from here on out.

Come on man, you know better...

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Well, it appears that I'll be left holding the bag with this one. Cry

Hopefully, the dev can exceed my expectations from here on out.

tekyboy

hero member

Activity: 508

Merit: 500

TekyBoy Crypto Services

Well first i thought it would be nice to see some coding and real work after ages, but guys now it seems to be really shady first account ownership then cat issuez and now spamey pull his plug out.
Just because of these all issues there wasnt much buy at stage 1 but i just reliazed isnt tarmi suppose to release some visual proof of working wallets.
I dont mind to buy this coin to see how wallet work on stage 3 or once it hits exchange but man we need some proof of what you are selling us

Crypto Enthusiast

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

You people... to much talk for nothing. You dont give the time to the dev even to release the wallet. If you don't like ico, don't buy, but let him release his project.

jeremy grol

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

Quote from: Sampey on December 22, 2015, 07:18:20 PM

Ok guys, no way to get the guarantees i need (and you need, of course).
I don't want to have associate my name/project with this project.
I tought this was a serious project. BUT, when things change from X to Y without respect agreements there's something shady behind.

So i'm out.

Please change OP and Remove all the part about "C.A.T. Partnership"

PS : Thanks to people who warn me and ask me to verify.

Well done Sampey.
Coin and project failed miserably.
Now it's time to refund investors who bought ico.

Next please.

LovSan

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

(●´ω´●) Nil de nihilo fit

tarspender, will you now refund people who bought into your lies? No C.A.T means just vaporware scambuilder and thats not fun. You ruined e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g, very shameful end Lips sealed

anticlimax

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Sampey on December 22, 2015, 07:18:20 PM

Ok guys, no way to get the guarantees i need (and you need, of course).
I don't want to have associate my name/project with this project.
I tought this was a serious project. BUT, when things change from X to Y without respect agreements there's something shady behind.

So i'm out.

Please change OP and Remove all the part about "C.A.T. Partnership"

PS : Thanks to people who warn me and ask me to verify.

This ico is nothing, but a poorly orchestrated scam.

Topic: ★★ Coinbuilder ★★ | BUILD | In-wallet altcoin generator | Stage 2 soon - page 5. (Read 31593 times)