All we would ask is that to receive (your share split) you show something from your end by leaving say 1BTC in the system or putting in at least 1BTC in the system over the first month or something like that.
Nooooooooooooope.
thnaks skitchen for reposne.
One less to deal with.
I urge caution guys. A professional (regulated) lender would not start writing off investors over silly insults and initial proposal rejections like a pissed off school boy.
In fact, he would be required by law to treat investors and creditors equally.
Let's see how long it takes for him to ask for additional BTC either through opening your wallets or releasing your CL balances
We are in no way pissed off as you put it , however we do not agree to your abuse or insults and have responded accordingly.
We have no intention of scamming anyone.
We are happy enough to just takle the CL site and the funds can be worked out between youself and TF, if you so choose.
We have an interest in the business model and makes sense to take what is already built, does this make any sense to you?
As stated, we can simply design an new site and go from there with no shareholding and no benefit to you other than your ability to use the new site, if that is what you choose to do.
Again, as clearly you do not understand, we are looking to provide an opportunity for you to secure what currently you don't have access to, which is your lost, stolen or missing BTC.
You are currently relying upon TF, an 18 year old to negotiate a settlement with each of you.
Unless you have control of the books of both of TF's enterprises, you have no way of knowing what is happening.
Forget us for the moment, however do yourself a favour and get a licensed company in Australia to take over the business so that the funds coming in by way of loans can be managed an apportioned correctly to those that are due.
If you do not understand this logic then we feel you may not ever see any funds returned.
Again, as stated several times now, we can cut and dice and negotiate the outcome however you like, what we propose does not necessary need to be the final outcome.
Instead of insulting us, you should be thanking us.
Any "balances" as you put it would be put into a trust account offline to enable free flowing return to those seeking return of capital, all with access to that account.
Thanks.