Author

Topic: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies! - page 153. (Read 639542 times)

newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Dear Coinmarketcap,

Can you add our markets to coinmarketcap please?

QRK was added on btc38 and bter from cny
qrk/cny Lack

http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=qrk

http://cn.bter.com/trade/qrk_cny
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1023

Gliss : --

Mazacoin has been added to Mintpal so volume is greatly higher now:
https://www.mintpal.com/market/MZC/BTC

And probably Cryptsy soon so watch for that. Thanks!

-------------

And to everyone - if you don't see your coin - don't forget this:

http://coinmarketcap.com/all.html
Shows all coins including under #100 ^^^

-----------

sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
Dear Coinmarketcap,

Can you add our markets to coinmarketcap please? https://exchange.nexxuscorp.com/

We have over 200 active markets so it may be hard, but we believe that this is the future of exchanges.

Kind Regards,

The Nexxus Corporation.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Fix up auroracoin before losing credibility please.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
The calculation is fine. People buying premined currency already calculated this risk into the price of the coin. Thus the calculation is good.

Considering your close association with Auroracoin I can understand why you may feel this way.

The fact remain that 99% of the coins comprising Auroracoin's current "market cap" are in the premine and do not circulate. Should Bitcoins that have not yet been mined be included in BTC's market cap?  Wink Cryptocurrencies aren't companies and coins held in an uncirculating premine are not issued shares. It might be worth making some adjustments in how market cap is calculated.

coinmarketcap.com loses much of its utility if market cap can be gamed by coins with a large uncirculating premine. Auroracoin is just the first coin of this type. Considering it's success, a wave of clones will come next.

Same shit for Ripple and his $1.5B market cap...
Ripple = decentralized exchange, XRP = centrally issued virtual asset/"math based currency" on Ripple. I guess you talk about the latter.

At least for Ripple I know that there could be a security breach at any moment at RippleLabs leading to a sale of all XRP they own. The only thing that pervents this is their security measures and their promise to distribute XRP fairly over time. This is not a part of the Ripple software, but something external to the network itself.

I don't know about Auroracoins, they too might already be stored on an address that is currently in escrow somewhere. As long as they have been created and could theoretically be moved, if the escrower(s) prooves to be dishonest this means they already exist, unlike e.g. the 20 millionth Bitcoin which has not yet been mined and even with huge efforts will not be mined (and thus made theoretically transferrable) for a very long time.
If they have not yet been created, I would remove them from the market cap. If they can be created easily by someone or already have been and are just depending on somebody to fulfil a promise and keep a private key secret, then they should be included, just like Bitcoins that have been mined but never moved are also included.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
The calculation is fine. People buying premined currency already calculated this risk into the price of the coin. Thus the calculation is good.

Considering your close association with Auroracoin I can understand why you may feel this way.

The fact remain that 99% of the coins comprising Auroracoin's current "market cap" are in the premine and do not circulate. Should Bitcoins that have not yet been mined be included in BTC's market cap?  Wink Cryptocurrencies aren't companies and coins held in an uncirculating premine are not issued shares. It might be worth making some adjustments in how market cap is calculated.

coinmarketcap.com loses much of its utility if market cap can be gamed by coins with a large uncirculating premine. Auroracoin is just the first coin of this type. Considering it's success, a wave of clones will come next.

Same shit for Ripple and his $1.5B market cap...
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
The calculation is fine. People buying premined currency already calculated this risk into the price of the coin. Thus the calculation is good.

Considering your close association with Auroracoin I can understand why you may feel this way.

The fact remain that 99% of the coins comprising Auroracoin's current "market cap" are in the premine and do not circulate. Should Bitcoins that have not yet been mined be included in BTC's market cap?  Wink Cryptocurrencies aren't companies and coins held in an uncirculating premine are not issued shares. It might be worth making some adjustments in how market cap is calculated.

coinmarketcap.com loses much of its utility if market cap can be gamed by coins with a large uncirculating premine. Auroracoin is just the first coin of this type. Considering it's success, a wave of clones will come next.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
Now watch what happens to Auroracoin after they released LTC on BTC China  Grin
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
Add another source for Mazacoin, MINTPAL.

hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
please add BTCCHINA to LTC
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
Mazacoin is now on Mintpal: https://www.mintpal.com/market/MZC/BTC

Could you please add it?  This is the coin for the Lakota nation like Auroracoin is for Iceland.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
It might be worth re-evaluating how you calculate market cap when a coin has a large uncirculating premine.

The calculation is fine. People buying premined currency already calculated this risk into the price of the coin. Thus the calculation is good.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
It might be worth re-evaluating how you calculate market cap when a coin has a large uncirculating premine.
Circulating or not, I think the criteria should be: Would it be possible in any way (this includes someone getting hacked + loosing control over private keys!) under the current rule set to transfer coins to others?
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
It might be worth re-evaluating how you calculate market cap when a coin has a large uncirculating premine.
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 500
Jump to: