Topic: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies! - page 34. (Read 639534 times)

So significant/huge >12%?

The developer premine coins aren't in public possession (unless they dumped them? but I'm not sure if the rules even allow that yet).

The original intent was to to distinguish country coins that had a very huge premine (like Auroracoin's 50% premine).   In Ethereum's case as long as the ICO coins are in the public's possession, I don't think the premine distinction is necessary.

Guys please add Bitstone

What does "significantly premined" constitute (e.g. what percentage?) and how is Ethereum not significantly premined when it had an ICO of most of the coin supply and another pure premine for developers of I think 12%?

When will you update clam coin moneysupply?

Please udate EmerCoin!

Explorer: https://emercoin.mintr.org/

You can use this:

https://just-dice.com/api/supply

{"moneysupply":1541886313048927,"digsupply":81867962870962,"stakesupply":64446172641730,"activesupply":146314135512693}

You probably want activesupply/1e8.

Never have I seen any indication that coinmarketcap removes scams. There are many scams listed.

Perhaps there is a role to play for a site that vets and rates coins but this clearly isn't it.

1.Fraudulent claims about being used "as the major transaction currency of a major international research institution" (paraphrased), clearly false. Claims of being used by merchants and services on the darknet, also clearly false.
2.Fraudulent claims of affiliation with Cicada 3301, clearly false.
3.Fraudulent claims of being launched in 2012, clearly false.
4.Crippled miner, likely used to create an artificiallly-low hash-per-node and appearance of a larger and older notwork, as opposed to a few PCs in an office, university lab, or low budget cloud farm. Original scammers only released their uncrippled miner after others had become public, which thankfully happened pretty quickly.
5.Propaganda campaign to promote Bytecoin, the fake 2012 backstory, and smear Monero via secret financial backing of cointelegraph (now well documented, including screen shots and authenticated emails) and almost certainly other web outlets as well as wikipedia manipulation (as yet unproven, but obvious).
6.Transaction flow is almost certainly faked via an automated process as there are virtually no independent uses of Bytecoin, and the transaction flow doesn't even show normal fluctuations. Any real network would have periods of slow/no transactions, even Bitcoin does at orders of magnitude more overall usage. Bytecoin does not.
7.Sham trading on hitbtc where bots trade with themselves, manipulating both price and especially volume. Again, sham trading never slows down or stops, unlike non-fake exchange trading. Well documented.
8.Purchased accounts and sock puppet accounts (both well documented) on bitcointalk used to post phony "independent" analysis in support of Bytecoin and the fake backstory.9.Manipulated whitepaper documents and web sites (for example, the "fingerprint" CSS reset code was removed after being identified as very strongly linking various "independent" web sites and projects, and then fraudulently claimed to have never been present).

If that isn't a scam I don't know what is.

Where do you get 1460K number?  The explorer used to have the number of claimed clams, but now I can't find it.

Updated, thanks.



Where do you get 1460K number?  The explorer used to have the number of claimed clams, but now I can't find it.

The only blockchain explorers for AEON that I know about are chainradar and minergate, both of which show the correct supply.

Looks like there is also a problem with the active supply of CLAMs

  I wonder how often they update the active supply.  They show 1,079K and there is currently 1,460K.  Digger just finished digging in the last few days.   So they are off ~400K.  Which is quite a bit with such a low starting point.