Topic: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies! - page 44. (Read 639542 times)

someone is clear influencing the coinmarketcap DMD pricecharts

the two spike at 0.00080 and 0.00100 dont represent cryptsy or bittrex prices



i have no idea about the motivation of whoever do this by abuse some small but expensive buys
at small markets like comkort and cryptsy dmd/xrp

we from DMD Diamound Foundation are strict against such attempts to abuse a coinmarketcap calculation weakness
where small volume markets have to much impact

we are very happy with the real price increase last month from 0.00050 to 0.00065
there is absolute no need to make it look higher

XPOST:

Exactly.  The coins which were mined previous to the announced release date are obviously premined, whether or not they were included in the genesis block.

drk/dash supporters are saying "proudly instamined" so instead of arguing why don't you help us figure out a way to objectively label instamined coins as "significantly instamined" like your coin (dash/drk)?

To Gliss,

Objectively speaking: A instamined currency would be one where the core features like block reward and coin supply were changed/did not go as planned, after launch that have benefitted a group of very early miners

Gliss is right that it needs to be objective, and the instamines we already know, such as the ones in Dash and Asiacoin, are objective, as the actual core parameters were changed. This rules out the need of saying subjective things like "Evan did the instamine on purpose", or "It was a total coincidence", since the objective proof of the instamine lies in the actual core features having changed(Practically the math behind the currency) after launch.

It probably is best to leave morals/speculation out of it no matter how probable..and just stick to what's known in the coin's history concerning it's parameters. In the case of Dash, it was instamined where it' actual block reward and coin supply were sliced after launch, obviously, hugely, benefitting very early miners. That is objective and therefore I believe it to be very reasonable to add a 'Instamine' currency filter for coins like Dash/Asiacoin and similar, especially since in the case of Dash, the 2million coin, 2 day instamine happened very early on and is not something a newcommer to crypto is likely to know about without research into the coin's history, and similar with Asiacoin where there was a hidden instamine that no one knew about until it was found coincidentally.

+1

That's the only logical solution.

For the record icebreaker is not hired by me or anyone I know or know about. That was a baseless and unfair statement.

The first 24 hours of the coins existence keep causing us problems

@Smooth.  I agree to get out of this thread, that's what I have been saying to you for the last 15 pages as you very well know.  And you know what I was referring too about your own launch "issues", it' discussed at length recently here and on other threads...so please let's not restart all this BS again, go and do you 'proposal' and let these guys make the decision....and ask your hired-goon Icebreaker aka Hashfast scammer Eduardo de Castro to lay off calling CMC a scam because Monero didn't get what it wanted...cheers

@CMC - Thank you for keeping your neutrality on this issue and sorry for the time this has taken up for you.

@BlockaFett, I think instamines are relevant information and can be identified and defined objectively.

Whatever other nonsense you are blabbering on about in terms of extra coins that didn't happen (or were you referring to the extra coins created in Dash due to the 500 coin per block bug?), please take it out of Gliss's thread, you are being rude.