CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies! - page 67.

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1090

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: bitpop on December 22, 2014, 07:48:44 AM

Coinmarketcap sold out to Homero

Not sure who the heck Homero was but looking at archives it seems like an alias for Ryan Kennedy who owes me mintpal coins
So that means it is in control of a scammer atm.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2nlaq5/is_it_true_that_the_same_lawyer_works_at_the/

Guess it makes sense reading through the last few pages about price manipulation seems like a very roundabout way to scam people though or just bad service.

Anotheranonlol

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 504

Sensible decision delisting XPY.

swansong

full member

Activity: 151

Merit: 100

paycoin (xpy) is a scam. if coinmarketcap.com continue listing paycoin, coinmarketcap.com is also scam to me.

LiteBit

legendary

Activity: 1133

Merit: 1050

Link updates for ShadowCash:

1. Explorer link on ShadowCash page isn't working.

It could be either of the following:
http://shadow.blockexplorer.cc/chain/ShadowCash
http://explorer.shadow.cash/

2. The Discussion link can also be changed to:
http://shadowtalk.org/

3. Exchange added in the Markets tab:
Excoin added ShadowCash to their trade floor - https://exco.in/exchange/BTC/SDC

marine4u

full member

Activity: 673

Merit: 105

Quote from: bitpop on December 22, 2014, 07:48:44 AM

Coinmarketcap sold out to Homero

also just noticed everyone else replied before me was talking about the same subject GOOD!

correction on PAYCOİN

further investigation shows same 7 days 6 hours of inactivity increasing premine to %63 on XPY and still no mention of it.

only less than 100 people seem to fall into the $20 per coin trap on the website, now trading at $11 wait for the massive dump.

just when I thought I had seen everything. WOW.

bitpop

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 1060

Coinmarketcap sold out to Homero

marine4u

full member

Activity: 673

Merit: 105

I think XPY Paycoin deserves a chop on the Marketcap, just like Marinecoin or Ripple,

%52 premined at least and no one says a word very strange,

at least a premined tag should be added,

this screenshot from their block explorer here for proof, https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/#!rich

Bansheroom

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: jimmothy on December 22, 2014, 06:52:28 AM

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 22, 2014, 06:14:27 AM

Quote from: jimmothy on December 21, 2014, 07:11:49 PM

Quote from: DiCE1904 on December 21, 2014, 06:42:47 PM

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

I'm also disappointed.

It's widely known by now that the creator is a pathological bullshitter who makes up huge claims purely for sales. Everything they do/claim is a marketing ploy that always fails to materialize.

There are no investors who bought 4.8m paycoins for $100m and and there aren't 7.2m coins distributed to customers.

Most likely likely 50-500k coins have been distributed to customers and the rest is owned by GAW.

11.5 million coins haven't even been moved since being premined.

Take a look at the block explorer. Much more coins have been moved around than you little liar want to tell us.
If you try to fool people like coinmarketcap does, do it less obviously.

Why don't you try looking at the blockchain?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/#!rich

11.5 million coins were last moved 7 days 5 hours ago which is a few hours after mining began.

There are only 6 investors holding prime controllers (including GAW) so I think it's safe to say that the 11.5m coins, which haven't moved after being "distributed to investors", are out of circulation.

I also think it's extremely unlikely that any of those 11.5m coins are not under GAW's control.

You should stop thinking, because the outcome is BS only.
And please don't state what you think as facts.

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 22, 2014, 06:14:27 AM

Quote from: jimmothy on December 21, 2014, 07:11:49 PM

Quote from: DiCE1904 on December 21, 2014, 06:42:47 PM

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

I'm also disappointed.

It's widely known by now that the creator is a pathological bullshitter who makes up huge claims purely for sales. Everything they do/claim is a marketing ploy that always fails to materialize.

There are no investors who bought 4.8m paycoins for $100m and and there aren't 7.2m coins distributed to customers.

Most likely likely 50-500k coins have been distributed to customers and the rest is owned by GAW.

11.5 million coins haven't even been moved since being premined.

Take a look at the block explorer. Much more coins have been moved around than you little liar want to tell us.
If you try to fool people like coinmarketcap does, do it less obviously.

Why don't you try looking at the blockchain?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/#!rich

11.5 million coins were last moved 7 days 5 hours ago which is a few hours after mining began.

There are only 6 investors holding prime controllers (including GAW) so I think it's safe to say that the 11.5m coins, which haven't moved after being "distributed to investors", are out of circulation.

I also think it's extremely unlikely that any of those 11.5m coins are not under GAW's control.

Bansheroom

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: jimmothy on December 21, 2014, 07:11:49 PM

Quote from: DiCE1904 on December 21, 2014, 06:42:47 PM

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

I'm also disappointed.

It's widely known by now that the creator is a pathological bullshitter who makes up huge claims purely for sales. Everything they do/claim is a marketing ploy that always fails to materialize.

There are no investors who bought 4.8m paycoins for $100m and and there aren't 7.2m coins distributed to customers.

Most likely likely 50-500k coins have been distributed to customers and the rest is owned by GAW.

11.5 million coins haven't even been moved since being premined.

Take a look at the block explorer. Much more coins have been moved around than you little liar want to tell us.
If you try to fool people like coinmarketcap does, do it less obviously.

cloverme

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1057

SpacePirate.io

Quote from: DiCE1904 on December 21, 2014, 06:42:47 PM

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

Disappointed here too, I sort of consider them the authority on it. Shame it appears some type of change took place for maybe marketing or other reason. I'd be nice to get a statement on what the situation was with it.

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: DiCE1904 on December 21, 2014, 06:42:47 PM

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

I'm also disappointed.

It's widely known by now that the creator is a pathological bullshitter who makes up huge claims purely for sales. Everything they do/claim is a marketing ploy that always fails to materialize.

There are no investors who bought 4.8m paycoins for $100m and and there aren't 7.2m coins distributed to customers.

Most likely likely 50-500k coins have been distributed to customers and the rest is owned by GAW.

11.5 million coins haven't even been moved since being premined.

DiCE1904

legendary

Activity: 1118

Merit: 1002

Just lost all my respect CoinMarketcap. shouldn't of been strong armed with how you calculated paycoins market cap

PilotofBTC

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Gliss on December 21, 2014, 03:42:50 PM

XPY Available supply now reflects the amount in circulation as shown on the block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/

Ah ok thanks, that excludes the coins in Prime controllers.

Got it!

Bansheroom

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gliss on December 21, 2014, 03:42:50 PM

XPY Available supply now reflects the amount in circulation as shown on the block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 03:25:55 PM

Quote from: inBitweTrust on December 21, 2014, 03:16:57 PM

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 02:56:20 PM

With the amount of last minute changes to this launch, can you blame them? This is a highly unregulated IPO/ICO which may even be illegal. What is wrong about being careful? There are many unanswered questions that create large red flags like -
Seems as if they are stumbling around half blind looking for the correct numbers.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/24461/can-we-see-the-registration-as-msb/2

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 02:56:20 PM

And again: Market cap is pure math only! "false statements and exaggerations" have NOTHING to do with market cap, get it.

Why don't you create a competing site that uses simple math to compare coinmarket caps. Coinmarketcap has different metrics to judge how many coins are in circulation than you. They aren't counting over 2/3rds of ripples either.

A Better judge of a coins strength would be an algorithm that compared price to average daily liquidity because Bitcoin's 4-5 billion market cap is bullshit as well.

Last minute changes....have ZERO relevance for market cap.

Why should i do? Only thing i want that they CLEARY state that their numbers are manipulated. They pretend to show "Crypto-Currency Market Capitalizations" but show manipulated numbers that have nothing to do with "Market Capitalizations".

Numbers aren't manipulated. Excluding the amount held by the issuers is just another useful way to calculate a market cap: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_float

If you want to see rankings based on the total supply issued, there is special view for that: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/market-cap-by-total-supply/

Your numbers are still wrong. According to your last post that i quoted here, the issuers (GaW) hold 7 million XPY. Thats not true.

inBitweTrust

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 501

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 03:39:53 PM

As long as it is not stated on the homepage it is a secret.
If you trust XPY or not, cap is the same. If you like/trust GaW, XPY, MS, apple, exxon or whatever company or coin has ZERO relevance for their market cap.

Who is "the rest of us"? You can speak for you alone and no one else.

Coin market cap already is matching paycoins explorer...
http://coinmarketcap.com/

So you were getting all pissed off this whole time because a single site operator wasn't doing his research quick enough during the holidays?

Ridiculous.

Gliss

sr. member

Activity: 258

Merit: 252

XPY Available supply now reflects the amount in circulation as shown on the block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 03:25:55 PM

Quote from: inBitweTrust on December 21, 2014, 03:16:57 PM

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 02:56:20 PM

With the amount of last minute changes to this launch, can you blame them? This is a highly unregulated IPO/ICO which may even be illegal. What is wrong about being careful? There are many unanswered questions that create large red flags like -
Seems as if they are stumbling around half blind looking for the correct numbers.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/24461/can-we-see-the-registration-as-msb/2

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 02:56:20 PM

And again: Market cap is pure math only! "false statements and exaggerations" have NOTHING to do with market cap, get it.

Why don't you create a competing site that uses simple math to compare coinmarket caps. Coinmarketcap has different metrics to judge how many coins are in circulation than you. They aren't counting over 2/3rds of ripples either.

A Better judge of a coins strength would be an algorithm that compared price to average daily liquidity because Bitcoin's 4-5 billion market cap is bullshit as well.

Last minute changes....have ZERO relevance for market cap.

Why should i do? Only thing i want that they CLEARY state that their numbers are manipulated. They pretend to show "Crypto-Currency Market Capitalizations" but show manipulated numbers that have nothing to do with "Market Capitalizations".

Numbers aren't manipulated. Excluding the amount held by the issuers is just another useful way to calculate a market cap: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_float

If you want to see rankings based on the total supply issued, there is special view for that: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/views/market-cap-by-total-supply/

inBitweTrust

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 501

Quote from: PilotofBTC on December 21, 2014, 03:36:04 PM

I'm not sure where the coin population of XPY comes from. But, there are currently

"moneysupply" : 12343204.03970300,

Coins.

Yes, and coinmarketcap has always shown that .... and look ... they just updated their site to now reflect 5,593,204 XPY available supply showing a number 4 spot on coin market cap .....

Bansheroom

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: inBitweTrust on December 21, 2014, 03:34:20 PM

Quote from: Bansheroom on December 21, 2014, 03:25:55 PM

Last minute changes....have ZERO relevance for market cap.

Why should i do? Only thing i want that they CLEARY state that their numbers are manipulated. They pretend to show "Crypto-Currency Market Capitalizations" but show manipulated numbers that have nothing to do with "Market Capitalizations".

There is no secret that they calculate market cap on their perceived available supply after they investigate. This is the same for all other coins.

You seem to have a sense of entitlement into thinking that a free website should hurry up or just have faith in a botched IPO which is now on its 3rd last minute hardfork -
https://hashtalk.org/topic/24985/pow-to-pos-change-over-should-be-in-progress/52

The rest of us are more reasonable and want to do a bit more research and verify all the claims made.

As long as it is not stated on the homepage it is a secret.
If you trust XPY or not, cap is the same. If you like/trust GaW, XPY, MS, apple, exxon or whatever company or coin has ZERO relevance for their market cap.

Who is "the rest of us"? You can speak for you alone and no one else.

PilotofBTC

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1001

I'm not sure where the coin population of XPY comes from. But, there are currently

"moneysupply" : 12343204.03970300,

Coins.

Topic: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies! - page 67. (Read 639534 times)