Topic: CoinsSource Journalist Aleppo Allesadero Fired - page 3. (Read 4434 times)

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/ann-coins-source-acquire-stock-in-a-crypto-based-company-sourcecoins-src.299765/page-14
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270852.1165

that is my confrontation with him on the Securecoin issue back in May (the SECOND TIME) (i don't see the first time on Google *yet)
the first time was at least 2/3 before that roughly..

i brought that up as a perfect example of extreme dishonesty and scammy antics etc etc

when i originally had my first run in with him about Secure coin it was with maybe around 10 other guys who backed me up..
random guys here who seen what i did and agreed unanimously what he did was so stupid (or scammy) we all lined up to take turns laughing at him.
he was sooooooo apologetic it was hilarious he kept saying it was an accident and that he didn't mean to to do it (re-use a trade symbol in use already)
and hey maybe it was an accident but it was funny and at least a bit fishy factoring in the circumstances..
i honestly figured he was just an idiot because he popped up in December. (but after i told him and he kept doing it was for sure doing it on purpose)

back then while apologizing he started saying he would fix this trade symbol problem before he launched his coin..
you see he did not add it to any exchanges yet etc and it was a pre-ann IPO shit clone topic of sorts..
he SWORE he would fix it and apologized to us all..

2/3 months later i see SRC added to Poloniex and i am like what the fuck ?? like seriously ?
We fucking TOLD HIM !
he and polo never bothered to check either and when i told Polo three months later as the mods kept hiding when i brought it up..
when i corned a Polo mod on the matter 2 or 3 times they got lippy and played dumb about it and the best i could get out of them was "ok" (ONE TIME)
and they went on for another couple months leaving exactly as i warned them it was.. they knew they didn't care.. the coin creator knew and did it on purpose.
if it was not a problem then why is it changed now ?

so when i seen it listed on poloniex he got extremely mouthy this time (this time i was speaking by myself in the ANN section with no back up unlike last time)
and all of a sudden noob dummy accounts started popping up instantly calling me names
trying to discredit me as hard at they could and he denied any of that convo happened before and that i made it all up and that i was a troll etc.
and no i sure as fucking hell don't appreciate that one god damn bit !

He knew damn well i was telling the truth 100% and he has the nerve to spout off back then and have me trolled with shell accounts ? gimme a break !
And Polo .. lol nice surprise there, guys you think they give a shit ? not bloody likely.. smug ass ocker exchange pricks ..the usual dick head exchange bullshit !

then later he comes out with changes to try and distance himself as much as possible from Secure Coin dropping using the Term "Source Coin" and playing dumb (as much as possible)

then the kicker is after all that shit while still a coin cloning noob he takes it upon himself to start POD service (guess who's clone coins are checked out ?)
the nerve wow ! ..the audacity and the gall of this little fucker LOL

that was far more than enough for me to see he has no fucking credibility.. he has demonstrated crystal clear extreme dishonesty
when your a coin cloner who is pretty much caught using tons of accounts here and you JUST got here ..do i have to spell it the fuck out ?
looks like i did........... yet again 

and that is why he played dumb..
that is why all these fuckers here play dumb.. busted with scammy shit then they sweep it up and and cover it up and play stupid..

and do it ALL OVER AGAIN once people are looking the other way.

this guys trade mark MO is wait, launch, hide/stay low-key for a while then come back then hide and on and on.. round & round.
this story shows how if a bunch of us confronted him and how he then he came clean
and said sorry profusely but when confronted by one guy he just played dumb and attacked & trolled.
because he thought he could get away with it obviously.

I take everything you say with a pinch of salt. It seems you have a vendetta against anything and anyone that doesn't directly benefit your own interests. You're completely unable to engage in constructive discussion, hurling insults at everyone. All your posts are loaded with such vitriol and hatred. I really hope, for your sake, your online persona doesn't match your real life one because you will lead a very sad and lonely life.

smooth over your shit to pad your wallet ? i don't fucking think so buddy.. you know damn well what you can do but you won't because it'll fuck up your cred here.
i gave you your chance and then i gave you another and THEN you decided to be big ass cocky mouthy little asshole and pretend i didn't give the first warning. (with other guys)
3rd time i'm done with you buddy no more bullshit.. i don't care what you think.. kiss my ass.

you have demonstrated extreme dishonesty and a massive wall of two faced attitude..
ass kissing and playing dumb or outright aggressive denial and attacking with lies.
you act like a 16 yr old on the best of days and 9 yr old caught with his hand in the cookie jar on bad days.

if your did that i have no trust in your fleet of IPO coins and their rather subtle connected shit services.
fuck your little empire of scammy clone coin bullshit and your noob ass wannabee POD scheme pal.
and the rest of you supporting this idiot ? well lay down with dogs you get fleas.. enjoy.

and all the rest of you need to smarten up and pay attention i warned you all when he showed up in December to deaf ears..

oh yeaaaah i REALLY want to talk to this fucker on the phone LOL

i am REALLY sick of dealing with this scammy fucker and his antics and games AND for taking the back lash for warning you guys
and then to add insult injury you guys ignoring me 100% until someone else comes along and says oh hey looks like he was right all along.

reality check.

ALL these fuckers are corrupt deceitful pieces of shit and if you start digging you find pretty well none of them are honest.
greed and anonymity does not mix.. all you have to do is come here and lie your ass off and confuse little stupid pricks with too much money and not enough brains.

by the way if you Google'd it or even tried to use the search function it would have come up but lets get real here guys..
not one of you out there gives a flying fuck who a scammer is ..as long as it pads your wallet you turn your head and look the other way.
nothing is going to change that is how this pathetic ponzi scheme "coins" bullshit works.

a bunch of competing groups of corrupt assholes and funny enough most of them are named Dan LOL

just ignore me and be optimistic and invest in faggy shitcoin scheme no. 1,999
eat your hotdog and i will try not to tell you how it's made but don't lie to me about what it's in them

tk808, Thank you for taking the time to respond to my PM. I had a long-winded response but won't send it as I see you've pulled the article.

FWIW, I've read many good, informative and unbiased articles on your website. I commend you on that. I've particularly enjoyed the XC articles you've published in the past being an XC investor. However, all the positive news pertaining to XC has been completely wiped out and made redundant by this one appalling article by Aleppo. A lot of people in crypto are just casual investors who have read that article and now associate Dan Metcalf with the word scam and have already exited his projects and won't ever be back. What's done is done.

You might not think there's anything sinister behind Aleppo's motives but the trail of evidence against him is quite compelling. At the very least he is an extremely poor journalist. Read his other articles, especially the market analysis sections - He always speculates on a coins potential value. I don't believe a journalist should ever do this as it amounts to offering financial advice based on their own opinion. Anyway I'll drop this Aleppo vendetta. Regardless of his questionable morals, he's still a very poor journalist. I will be keeping a very close eye on him.

I still think you should issue a public statement with an apology to Dan Metcalf. If the world of crypto is ever to be taken seriously then we need to hold ourselves to the same standards as other industries. If a newspaper wrote such libelous claims based on such conjecture then they would be forced to publish a public apology. CoinsSource should do the same.

Spoetnik is deeply in love with Coins Source. Really wish i could reciprocate those feelings to you over a Phone chat... as i sit here waiting for (edit) the* phone call.


Here's the thread referencing Spotneik's Passion for Coins Source:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trust-index-the-original-developer-verification-free-for-next-48hrs-716264

Where have you pointed this out, link please??

i already pointed out the coinsource guy is a corrupt lying noob.
he is also a coin cloner and scammer.

not sure how many times i have to type out a giant wall of text none of you give a fuck about LOL

summary.. little shit shows up here in Dec2013 then starts coin cloning and then with IPO's etc
then he has the bright idea to approve coins ROFL

if that doesn't clue you all in nothing will..

Use your real account name instead of being a bitchmade troll. Doesn't add much credibility to your cause when you hide behind a newbie account. I have no relationship with Aleppo and Soepkip handled that article not me. If you had any reading comprehension you would see that the interview was with the SDC community manager.

There is a massive issue in crypto news today of journalists not doing their research before publishing an article. This particular journalist, Aleppo, wrote an article on the stealthcoin peer review and dismissed the findings from the bitcoin core dev as "fud" instead of technical review of the claims made in their whitepaper. I called him out on Twitter for lacking integrity https://twitter.com/AleppoCF/status/521214689490251776

"@AleppoCF @CoinsSource since when is tech peer review cataloged as FUD? There's a serious lack of journalistic integrity in crypto today.."

The Stealthcoin dev posted a thank you to longandshort for the research and peer review. Why would he legitimately thank longandshort if it was FUD?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9182120

"Again I would like to thank those who have pointed out publicly a critical deficiency in Chandran signatures as they apply to crypto-currencies [1]. Namely, the deficiency is that Chandran signatures are untraceable. I would especially like to mention that LongAndShort's relentless research into the matter was impressive and genuinely helpful." Hondo (XST Lead Developer)

The majority of the community lashed out against SDC instead of thanking longandshort like the XST developer did. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9154656

There is another massive issue in crypto with people like you making allegations without any "evidence" to base it off of other than your tin foil hat bullshit. "Oh they follow each other on Twitter" LMAO. SDC has nothing to do with CoinSource and neither does anyone in the community.

Why don't you focus on the real scams in crypto like for example the BitSwift developer aka Coinada aka Bitcad4u (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcad4u-134027) who is BobSurplus's right hand man. The reason all the Blocknet info came out was based on a communication between a known pumper "Coinada" (BitSwift Dev) who happened to send a communication to MrBoh confirming that Dan Metcalf was the anon developer for HAL. Why don't you target the journalists that have written stories on that?

"thought some of you here would find this interesting considering Dan gave XST the stellar review"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8806666

translation? paid review to justify their stealthcoin pump

What's even funnier is the bullshit SDC fud thread which was started by the LXC dev. Here we have a case of 2 developers (LXC + SWIFT) busy scamming and scheming the crypto community. I would not be surprised if you were Coinada using a bitchmade account to throw out allegations to cover your own ass. More than likely you're one of TrangLee's shill accounts a known sockpuppet of Bob's pump and dump group.

PoopieLaxitive31 = KidCrypto (the developer of LXC) started that entire thread was created by the developer of Librexcoin. Another Bob Surplus pump and dump exposed by MrBoh back in August:

https://twitter.com/CryptoBoh/status/502836784704012289

Robert Duskes Jr. a.k.a Bobsurplus (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bobsurplus-180921) a.k.a Coinflipper a.k.a EMC2Whale (https://twitter.com/EMC2Whale) a.k.a. Coinstarx a.k.a. Coingekko is shown above revealing to MrBoh that he controlled 20%+ of the LXC coin supply.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom/1324-lexington-avenue-286-new-york-10128/robert-duskes-scamstopperscom-robert-bradley-bob-duskes-robert-bradley-duskes-used-to-646481

Logs: https://www.zerobin.net/?99c41ace76ffa3b9#TjWWhWizGfsmYsNr2AWtcRpUHeNQuyh18udJ1t+h01c=

My full response to their FUD on their shill thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9416289

Bottom line is you are just as guilty of scamming as those pump groups and you are no doubt in league with them by spreading misinformation like this to distract people from the real scams going on.

LXC, XST, SWIFT, Blocknet all BobSurplus plays and the cycle continues to repeat itself. People like Boh exposing them and people like yourself distracting people from the truth.

This is the last communication I'll make on this thread. I've got far better things to do than entertain your bitchmade tin foil hat conspiracy.

I'm not going to spend the next half an hour looking for SDC trolls. I'm far too lazy to even look through your post history! And this is not what I'm trying to prove. I'm trying to out this scumbag journalist. It struck a chord with me that someone could write such a biased and unbalanced article based on pure conjecture. He's partly responsibilty for trying to ruin an honest man's reputation. You google Dan Metcalf and that dishonest article pops up. That automatically damages his business rep. If it was me I would be pursuing legal action against Aleppo Allesadero for publishing libelous information.

My honest opinion is that trollsroyce wrote the article (hence the twitter links with journo) and the journalist cleaned up the grammar and put his name on it in exchange for money or SDC. This is an abuse of his position as people automatically give credence to information published on a so-called reputable site. That's my issue here.

For what it's worth, I read the extensive chat logs between SDC dev ryno and dan that were released today. It was about the possibility of a merger between SDC and XC. This would've benefited both sides imo but they pulled out. I wonder why? pookie and trollsroyce influence? This merger could've been huge. The winning anon coin will be the one that collaborates and merges with the right competitors. No single anon coin will develop all these wonderful features on their own to be the leading anon coin. I guarantee you the anon coin that wins the race will be the one that merged their coding, pr, marketing etc resources together with another competitor's. XC and SDC's tech would've complimeted each other beautifully.

However, no matter how good your tech is, the influence a couple large bag-holders have in your community is worrisome. They have a history of pumping 'n' dumping other coins (cinni, cloak) and now they're in your community. I may one day invest in SDC but not while those 2 are hanging around.

You have successfully made me go completely off-topic lol

I can now understand why you believe all that you hear. You're quoting a known nerd rager and calling it gospel!

The sdc community members all chose not to go into the blocknet and we copped a lot of heat for that included was tranglee. So call it a kneejerk reaction, show me 10 sdc trolls?

You cant find them because there isn't the amount you have been made to believe there is. There is about 10 threads abusing sdc, lying and saying they are trolls because me, one person went to the xst thread and brought up a technical problem with their white paper along with asking why they removed razorcoins copyright and replaced it with their own. I was abused for days until their dev THANKED me and it was over!

I was there for days because i would not back down and i was bringing up something they all should have been asking themselves. I mean it's their money. My aim there was to hopefully help to educate and show the contrast of a good vs bad comunity reaction to people. It was to ask the damn questions they were afraid to knwo the answers to, so we don't completely wreck the image of this entire space by allowing so many scams to continue!!

This is nothing but the work of some angry kids who do not understand this tech and have cultivated big enough rumors to have you believe whole heartedly that sdc is full of trolls.. I believe some of the sdc community are outspoken but i don't know of many trolls! I think one is poooki thats it!

The rest are very passionate people and should be thanked instead of called a troll..They are asking the questions that so many communities have made it so people are afraid to ask in fear of this kind of misconception. Which really goes against everything we are trying to achieve here at the core!

Then how come when I look at the posting history of these trolls 90% of them come from the SDC community or newb accounts? There are literally 100's of coin communities out there so why is the majority of it coming from SDC? The SDC community is also relatively small. And add the fact this guy called the SDC smear campaign weeks ago:


It's clear this smear campaign has been orchestrated by certain members of the SDC community. And Aleppo Allesadero is part of it.

Why is it my smear campaign? All i did was make a thread and ask 8 questions. They got answered and that was it, i was done. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dan-metcalf-please-respond-to-the-allegations-qa-of-xcurrency-xc-841958

I'm just becoming this scapegoat as is SDC when it has nothing to do with either.

You asking these questions and that is admirable and i encourage you to ask relevant questions of people who control peoples money! I think you are barking up the wrong tree here, trying to discredit some people who are asking these questions about blocknet to some how negate the 30+ threads started on this topic because you cant blame them all at once!

I'm not asking for peoples money. Blocknet does not make me insecure in the slightest. Its a good idea but its not very trustworthy given the rush of it and the workload dan has already and the coins involved in its initial offering. It was a failed attempt to push all of those markets up with the alure of them getting a 10% discount by using them to buy tokens. I belive that model to begin with was poorly thought through and to me it showed bias.

Thats what i saw when i looked deep into it all. It is why i wanted nothing to do with it, because i knew something like this was quite likely to happen at some stage. Being that it was only a matter of time before someone started asking the same questions!

I don't have to explain myself at all but i am because you need to understand something here. I'm here for the ideals of this space. I'm very vocal and i use this account to say whatever i like i dont have multiple accounts like some. I try never to come without proof of something, i don't play guess work, i just lay the facts out.

Not many like it, i'm abrasive at times and i have poor typing skills but i am in no way responsible for peoples money and i am in no way what you and so many before you are trying to paint me as.. I'm just becoming everybody scapegoat, which i completely experted and deal with. As i said, i believe you are barking up the wrong tree here.

That's what I'm doing, focusing on my project. The Blocknet has suffered because of your smear campaign. This so-called journalist is part of this smear campaign. I'm just returning the favor.

Thats great focus on your project and stop trying to draw lines to things when you will most likely never know the answer to it all!

Thing is no one in this op is asking for peoples money!

why did CoinsSource organise a Q&A with Dan Metcalf to address the incorrect assertions in the article if it was "honest"? I think they realise they dropped the ball on that one and trying to set record straight.

And FYI I've invested in blocknet. I could get a refund if I want but will 100% not be pursuing one.

Its really simple. Don't take/allow premine, don't hold/condone an ITO, don't do shady deals with people behind closed doors, with questionable people when you are in control of peoples money. And don't cite old white papers stating that its possible to implement something when clearly it isn't. And you wont get backlash!

For you, i would say get over all this, its done, its over. Do your research and stop attacking the people who are trying to keep questionable people in this industry honest, you will fail every time!