Pages:
Author

Topic: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s - page 18. (Read 231002 times)

full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 100
Judging by how [Cointerra] have handled everything so far, they arent going to make it right for anyone in the early batches, they are going to ignore the criticisms about their late, overpowered, underperforming machines and just continue to scam people out of their hard earned bitcoin.  I can't believe theyre still claiming on their site that they are performing up to spec, not to mention theyre taking pre orders for June now?!  It doesnt matter how polished or if they look like they have their shit together, they have acted just like every other asic company out there.

I'm hearing rumors of Cointerra chips actually operating at the advertised "greater than 500GH/s."

The relevance of HashFast's EVO product is obvious; it's the highest performance Custom Hardware ever demonstrated.
This is not true.   I have CT that are hashing faster than that right now.   You need to stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.   I am willing to sell you one if you wish to see.

How can [HashFast's Sierra EVO] be the worlds first 2th miner when people have been able to reach 2th on a terraminer?

Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?

Hashfast is calling me a troll this is rich
sr. member
Activity: 533
Merit: 251
Huh True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

Technically, yes.

It's the PCB that is slowing it down.

Question for HF: did your first shipped batch resulted in a performance >= of 400GH per chip? No, it was 390GH. And you used a fake result in your mining dashboard to prove your customers that they were mining at 400GH, right?

Does anyone has a clue that by when cointerra is going to fix this PCB issue? Do old customers get benefits when they fix up this issue? Or it just benefits those new Terraminers using new designed PCB board.

The issue of lower hashrate + higher power usage will never be fixed. They have literally switched products if you see on their site to 400Ghz PCI-E based product because its quite obvious they don't have a solution for this.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
so many posts get deleted but this fucktard from hashfast gets to jizz all over this thread constantly?

fuck you mods

sure delete this post and leave all of his..  well played


If your posting in HIS thread,yes HE deletes them,not the mods.But we're safe everywhere else  Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
I don't get why the whole community scammed by hashfast hasn't negative repped their scam my BJ only ever did 390 lol overclocked. So don't worry cointerra is still better at admitting theirs doesn't reach the advertised hash rate than lying like those monkeys at hashfast who never even hit specs with the BJ but can delete all posts of their lie of 800 gh board which clearly only hits 750 dumb fucks scared to show their face who be hiding and trolling on other threads like this one I hope you really love hashfast because honestly that's all you have ugly ass fool. Yes I am talking about the fools at hashfast who need to stay in hiding and only talk when they update orders.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
so many posts get deleted but this fucktard from hashfast gets to jizz all over this thread constantly?

fuck you mods

sure delete this post and leave all of his..  well played
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1020
Be A Digital Miner
Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?
I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....  
Minor Miner advised me to
stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.
So that's what I'm going to do. 
Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?
All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.
Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.
AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).
But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong.  Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?
I have told you I have seven above that number.   Put your money where your mouth is and buy them from me and you can hash them side by side with yours for the entire world to see whose machines are the better return.   I will sell them to you as a group for 600 coins.   That is less than your company took from people for 2.5TH/s of equipment that you delivered months late.   Be a man and send the coins.  I will ship the machines the same day and you will have them the next day in SF and you can show the whole world, side by side, whether your machines are better than these.   I will see you ONE for 400 BTC or all seven for 600BTC.   You chose.   
Put up or shut up and admit to being just a blowhard.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



-HashFast didn't provide windfalls by refunding $100 BTCs with an equal number of $1000 Bitcoins, therefore it's a Ponzi!!11!


Sounds like BFL_Josh got a second job  Cheesy

@unacceptable.. thanks for quoting this...

@halfass liason
you promised full bitcoin refunds.....  you promised by Jan 1...  I did not want a windfall from you.. i just wanted my bitcoins back that I was promised...  I have an email from HF saying that I would get all my bitcoins back...- YOU DEFRAUDED all batch one baby jet convesters.

Quote

From: "HashFast Support" <[email protected]>
To: "zzz" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: (Case 230) Refund Policy - zzzzz
Priority: normal
X-Sender: "HashFast Support" <[email protected]>



Hi Jim,
Thank you so much for your patience while I got the answer for you, I greatly appreciate it.

The answer is if you buy Baby Jet for 51 BitCoins today and it does not ship, you will be refunded the 51 BitCoins you paid.

I hope that helps and hope you have a good weekend!

Thanks,
Cara
HashFast Support
[email protected]


LMAO!!!!!!!!!!   Cheesy  Glad I could help & hope his "new' title sticks  Grin  He deserves it!!!!!!!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
Is the statement "Only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH/s miner" true or false?  

Nobody cares! You obviously don't understand that the amount of hashing power delivered to the customer is the only number that counts.

Would you prefer 1.5 TH now, or 2 TH at an undefined date in the future (which can be "never", looking at the current record and situation (broke?) at HashLast)?
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500

Does anyone has a clue that by when cointerra is going to fix this PCB issue? Do old customers get benefits when they fix up this issue? Or it just benefits those new Terraminers using new designed PCB board.

dont shoot the messenger...

i visited cointerra briefly yesterday and will probably pop back on monday before i go home (to london.. after attending the austin bitcoin conf and sxsw).  i also met with cloudhashing, who are hosting several of my systems.

I've been assuming that firmware updates help improve stability and give modest gains...  (as has been reported by others already - the latest firmware last week helped several systems eek out a bit more juice ... forum users mostly report good results)

I suspect the new board will only be used for future production (since they continue to claim 2 TH/s in their online store for May and June batch systems, they seem confident the may and june batches will be utilising the next board).

i don't think its realistic nor worth sending any of the existing machines back for an upgrade to get the boards replaced (the cost to both sides, several hundred bucks in shipping, plus downtime while its not hashing, etc - thus it isn't worth the effort nor significant expense)... let alone what it would cost cointerra to write off old boards and supply new ones (the chips are soldered in)... so being realistic, this is unlikely (imho!) to happen...

so, what we have right now, hashing away (at 1.6-1.7 th/s) is likely what it is and i doubt it will change much.. just improved with firmware updates and tweaks.  heck maybe someone will figure out how to over clock it like has happened over in the knc forums!

member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Huh True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

Technically, yes.

It's the PCB that is slowing it down.

Question for HF: did your first shipped batch resulted in a performance >= of 400GH per chip? No, it was 390GH. And you used a fake result in your mining dashboard to prove your customers that they were mining at 400GH, right?

Does anyone has a clue that by when cointerra is going to fix this PCB issue? Do old customers get benefits when they fix up this issue? Or it just benefits those new Terraminers using new designed PCB board.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000



-HashFast didn't provide windfalls by refunding $100 BTCs with an equal number of $1000 Bitcoins, therefore it's a Ponzi!!11!


Sounds like BFL_Josh got a second job  Cheesy

@unacceptable.. thanks for quoting this...

@halfass liason
you promised full bitcoin refunds.....  you promised by Jan 1...  I did not want a windfall from you.. i just wanted my bitcoins back that I was promised...  I have an email from HF saying that I would get all my bitcoins back...- YOU DEFRAUDED all batch one baby jet convesters.

Quote

From: "HashFast Support" <[email protected]>
To: "zzz" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: (Case 230) Refund Policy - zzzzz
Priority: normal
X-Sender: "HashFast Support" <[email protected]>



Hi Jim,
Thank you so much for your patience while I got the answer for you, I greatly appreciate it.

The answer is if you buy Baby Jet for 51 BitCoins today and it does not ship, you will be refunded the 51 BitCoins you paid.

I hope that helps and hope you have a good weekend!

Thanks,
Cara
HashFast Support
[email protected]

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Huh True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

Technically, yes.

It's the PCB that is slowing it down.

Question for HF: did your first shipped batch resulted in a performance >= of 400GH per chip? No, it was 390GH. And you used a fake result in your mining dashboard to prove your customers that they were mining at 400GH, right?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
HashLast_CL, you don't get the complete irrelevance of your 2TH cackle, don't you?

CT has delivered more than thousand miners, hashing at 1.5 TH or more right now.

"Or more?"  Does "or more" mean at least one or two CT miners actually got up to or past their 2TH/s spec?

Minor Miner told me to "stay up to date on what is available in the market right now" and that's what I'm going to do.

Current and potential ASIC customers deserve to know the plain facts.

Is the statement "Only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH/s miner" true or false?  

Two people have said it's false; I am seeking to confirm or invalidate their input.  Can you help?

Halfassed_CL's account has been hacked by BFL_Josh,things will return to normal when the drugs wear off  Grin

IOW, 'No, you can't help answer a simple question, but are willing to contribute a content-free personal attack just to demonstrate your troll skillz?'

Correct,your smarter than I thought  Grin   Speaking of "trolling",go look in the mirror  Cheesy

I would NEVER buy ANYTHING from Hashfast,aka BFL...........BTW,I LOVE my Antminers  Cheesy  Cause I have them mining NOW!!!  Tongue

I may get a Cointerra miner soon,gotta save up for the big boy toy's though  Sad
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
HashFast Community Liaison
HashLast_CL, you don't get the complete irrelevance of your 2TH cackle, don't you?

CT has delivered more than thousand miners, hashing at 1.5 TH or more right now.

"Or more?"  Does "or more" mean at least one or two CT miners actually got up to or past their 2TH/s spec?

Minor Miner told me to "stay up to date on what is available in the market right now" and that's what I'm going to do.

Current and potential ASIC customers deserve to know the plain facts.

Is the statement "Only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH/s miner" true or false?  

Two people have said it's false; I am seeking to confirm or invalidate their input.  Can you help?

Halfassed_CL's account has been hacked by BFL_Josh,things will return to normal when the drugs wear off  Grin

IOW, 'No, you can't help answer a simple question, but are willing to contribute a content-free personal attack just to demonstrate your troll skillz?'
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
HashLast_CL, you don't get the complete irrelevance of your 2TH cackle, don't you?

CT has delivered more than thousand miners, hashing at 1.5 TH or more right now.

"Or more?"  Does "or more" mean at least one or two CT miners actually got up to or past their 2TH/s spec?

Minor Miner told me to "stay up to date on what is available in the market right now" and that's what I'm going to do.

Current and potential ASIC customers deserve to know the plain facts.

Is the statement "Only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH/s miner" true or false? 

Two people have said it's false; I am seeking to confirm or invalidate their input.  Can you help?

Halfassed_CL's account has been hacked by BFL_Josh,things will return to normal when the drugs wear off  Grin
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
HashFast Community Liaison
HashLast_CL, you don't get the complete irrelevance of your 2TH cackle, don't you?

CT has delivered more than thousand miners, hashing at 1.5 TH or more right now.

"Or more?"  Does "or more" mean at least one or two CT miners actually got up to or past their 2TH/s spec?

Minor Miner told me to "stay up to date on what is available in the market right now" and that's what I'm going to do.

Current and potential ASIC customers deserve to know the plain facts.

Is the statement "Only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH/s miner" true or false? 

Two people have said it's false; I am seeking to confirm or invalidate their input.  Can you help?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?

I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....  

Minor Miner advised me to

stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.

So that's what I'm going to do. 

Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?

All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.

Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.

AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).

But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong.  Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?

I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason"  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

So you got a new title Huh    Grin

Huh True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

-HashFast didn't provide windfalls by refunding $100 BTCs with an equal number of $1000 Bitcoins, therefore it's a Ponzi!!11!

If nothing we do could make you consider buying from us, why are you posting here?  Batch One EVOs sold out almost instantly, so exhibiting your grudge in public hasn't had any noticeable effect.  Better get a Batch Two before they're gone!



Sounds like BFL_Josh got a second job  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
HashLast_CL, you don't get the complete irrelevance of your 2TH cackle, don't you?

CT has delivered more than thousand miners, hashing at 1.5 TH or more right now. How many TH has HashLast delivered?

My CT makes stable 1.5 TH at the moment, earning me around $120 every day.

My BabyJet hashes around 400 GH at the moment, which is around $30/day.

I paid around $ 6,500 for the CT and the equivalent of $ 40,000 for the BabyJet.

Which is the better deal?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
HashFast Community Liaison
Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?

I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....  

Minor Miner advised me to

stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.

So that's what I'm going to do. 

Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?

All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.

Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.

AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).

But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong.  Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?

I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason"  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

So you got a new title Huh    Grin

Huh True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?

I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....  

Minor Miner advised me to

stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.

So that's what I'm going to do. 

Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?

All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.

Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.

AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).

But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong.  Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?

I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason"  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

So you got a new title Huh    Grin
Pages:
Jump to: