Pages:
Author

Topic: CoinTerra Engineering Update: TerraMiner IV Hashing Live - page 2. (Read 5853 times)

hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Yes, I'm a little disappointed.  I was hoping (especially since they missed their target shipping date) that the 2TH/s figure was a very conservative estimate.  But it appears it's going to be a challenge to get it there which means if they are able to achieve it, the performance/watt target my get pushed (as we've seen from other vendors), and consequently it means that there's much less potential for overclocking.  I was hoping this news would come with a surprise announcement that they were already able to exceed their goal by 20% (2.4TH/s) or more much like KnC did.  As the two top manufacturer's in the market, KnC is their primary competition in my opinion, and based on the results from both companies, I think I'm a bigger fan of KnC and the philosophy by which they operate.

I'm invested in both as I own a 1st batch hosted KnC Jupiter, and I have two (2) Terrahash IV (early JAN) miners coming my way soon as well.  So, while I'm also very happy to see a working product, and they've done a great job overall...it seems to me they may have been a bit hasty with their performance predictions, and that's a little discouraging.  This isn't a bashing rant or anything...I'm very patient, and I'm confident this will be the best product on the market for several months (which is why I ordered two).

hope you forgive the length of this answer...

its premature to know whether it will overclock (or even if cointerra will allow it).   in some ways knc is responsible for setting unrealistic expectations in their customers but one thing they never did is allow their customers to overclock.  not only is it forbidden but there's extra circuitry in every knc box to make it extremely hard to do.

its possible knc deliberately underquoted their specs so that they've could pleasantly surprise their customers with 'more' when they deliver - sounds great if you're a customer (and i am).. and is fantastic to hear.. but when you make it your motto, and the customers expect it (and require it).. then you're setting them up for a potential disappointment if you don't hit the same amount of over delivered performance each and every time you deliver a new product.    if you make it your motto and stake your reputation to 'under promise and over deliver'... its almost a double edged sword.  on the one hand, you gain a fantastic reputation because people are expecting you to over deliver.. but on the other hand, you had better over deliver by enough..!  by as big a margin as you did last time, or they might not be happy about the bonus!  it'll get harder each time as you approach the limits of power, cooling, technology, etc.

its difficult to engineer something that will always have power to spare.  many engineers would even say that they already know in advance how fast it will go and aren't waiting 'to try it' before they find out how fast it will go.   knc had a fantastic opportunity by entering a market with a properly engineered, high tech solution in a market full of amateurs and lousy engineering.  but the market has changed and its no longer full of bad asic designs and amateurs.   the first time you do it, you can under-quote  because you know your chip is wayy better than everyone else.  but when the market becomes more crowded, its a lot harder to compete.   in the competitive world of pre-ordered miners, if you underquote what your box will do, you will look uncompetitive compared to the people who aren't underquoting or who are just naively optimistic (are you listening Ken?) and lose out to the people who are prepared to bend the truth (some others not to be named).  I'm not saying this has ever happened...!

.. but i somewhat agree with you in that with most of the 'high power' chip people - kncminer, hashfast, cointerra and even bitmine etc... that the power delivery seems to have become more of an issue than any of them could've possibly imagined and the way they've squeezed out more performance is by improving their power circuits.  ironic that the asic chips in most cases have worked first time (what are the chances!?) -  whereas the power input - good old fashioned analog circuit design - has become such a 'dark art' to be solved, and required lots of tweaks to find the best solution.   in some cases, like hashfast, this has taken significant amounts of time.

in cointerra's case (much like knc did) they seem to have over engineered some aspects of the design - the available power & cooling capacity... which should allow them a little room to tweak.  whether there's extra margin for over clocking, i doubt it.   knc doesn't let anyone overclock, for a good reason.  these things are built on the limit of the rest of the circuitry.    but I'm ok with cointerra taking a bit of extra time to deliver the performance they promised (especially as i am expecting a january batch, and they're not even a day late for my orders, yet, and i hope they arent).

if this was a performance car... its sold mostly on its performance compared to its peers.  you can't really get away with under declaring its performance (to delight your customers with a surprise extra bonus) and still sell your high performance cars as your competitors will be saying theirs is faster, even if it won't be.   knc did it once.  they over delivered by a huge margin.  that could easily be their motto... but now they have to over-deliver each and every time, which is really difficult to keep doing, especially when others aren't doing that.   as we approach the limits of power & cooling in a home system, i don't think significant over delivery is a viable future option.  in an ideal world... you engineer for what it can do, and do your best to deliver it in a reasonable time.

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
Looking forward to getting a unit this month (ETA was December)

Will get some details and photo's posted asap.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Humm...I'm a bit disappointed, I was hoping to see better than planned results by this point.  They're not following in KnC's footsteps of "under-promise-over-deliver" as I was hoping they would be.

edit - side note...those fans are totally overkill....I LOVE IT!  Grin

really?  at 1.6 TH in a 4U single box, you're a bit disappointed ?   they just showed proof... working... the fastest, lowest cost, and smallest working bitcoin mining box that has ever existed... running with only four chips and by the looks of it, at 70 degrees according to their stats, they're not even breaking a sweat....  and you're disappointed?     And they said each day their engineers make it go faster...

they've literally gone from yesterday not being in the mining business... to today, having an extremely impressive box...  hashing faster than any box I've ever seen... that i would happily take delivery of tomorrow...!

I'm fully expecting them to continue tweaking to hit their goals, aren't you?   And whats more..  if i could, id take it right now this second running at only 1.6TH!... as it stands.. wouldn't you?

this proof has literally de-risked my entire order with them.  i now know the chip works.. the board works... the software works... the power supplies work.. the cooling works... and... that they all work together in one box.    Now all they're doing is tweaking it to go 20% faster before they ship it?  heck, thats the smallest leap of faith I've ever been asked to make.

I'm pretty happy with what they showed...

Yes, I'm a little disappointed.  I was hoping (especially since they missed their target shipping date) that the 2TH/s figure was a very conservative estimate.  But it appears it's going to be a challenge to get it there which means if they are able to achieve it, the performance/watt target my get pushed (as we've seen from other vendors), and consequently it means that there's much less potential for overclocking.  I was hoping this news would come with a surprise announcement that they were already able to exceed their goal by 20% (2.4TH/s) or more much like KnC did.  As the two top manufacturer's in the market, KnC is their primary competition in my opinion, and based on the results from both companies, I think I'm a bigger fan of KnC and the philosophy by which they operate.

I'm invested in both as I own a 1st batch hosted KnC Jupiter, and I have two (2) Terrahash IV (early JAN) miners coming my way soon as well.  So, while I'm also very happy to see a working product, and they've done a great job overall...it seems to me they may have been a bit hasty with their performance predictions, and that's a little discouraging.  This isn't a bashing rant or anything...I'm very patient, and I'm confident this will be the best product on the market for several months (which is why I ordered two).
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
Personally I hoped they fail, because I don't like their faces.

This might be a language or cultural thing...

Can you explain your comment?  Whats wrong with their 'faces' ?

Just out of interest, which faces do you prefer?

And why do their faces make a difference to their product or company ?

And why would you want anyone in particular to fail ?  especially a company that has no track record in the past for doing bad things to customers.   i understand why some people might want avalon or bfl to to fail because of past treatment, but new companies shouldn't have the same issue.


He was just trying to be funny.

Oh how I wished I had a Terraminer coming my way.  I'm sooooo jealous! 
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
Be interesting to hear what the power consumption for the chips are... even when running at 400 GH/s. How does the Cointerra chip compare to the Bitfury and KnC chips?
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Personally I hoped they fail, because I don't like their faces.

This might be a language or cultural thing...

Can you explain your comment?  Whats wrong with their 'faces' ?

Just out of interest, which faces do you prefer?

And why do their faces make a difference to their product or company ?

And why would you want anyone in particular to fail ?  especially a company that has no track record in the past for doing bad things to customers.   i understand why some people might want avalon or bfl to to fail because of past treatment, but new companies shouldn't have the same issue.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Just Fun!
Video slows down at 0:24. Any reason?

good question... wonder why... voices certainly sound lower at that point...   perhaps its to let the viewer read the text on the display?
Oh I see, so this is video for dummies that doesn't know how to use pause key/button....

maybe it was hashing at 2 TH after all , and it only seemed slower because the video was slowed down ;-)



sure!  Grin
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io
Personally I hoped they fail, because I don't like their faces.
But from what I have seen so far, this is the most experience team.
The PCB are well thought unlike BFL gear and the PSU cables are thick enough to provide stable current.
This is the end of the line as far as the amount of GH/s thats fits on this die size at 28 nm.
Ofcourse you can make the die size bigger.
As a critic I have to admit no one could have done it faster and better than CoinTerra with these specs.
Everything was planned from the beginning, there was no room for mistake.
No fairytales like BFL and HashLast keeping the money flow in.
KnC took a different approach, they keep it simple to market it fast and improve their design after the first wave of their miners.
I have no doubt that KnC will not beat or at least come to the same level as CoinTerra with their Neptunes.

But I however see some points that could lead to failure when running the miners 24/7 and I still hope this will be the case, but probably they will
solve that by the time they mass production the TerraMiners.
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Video slows down at 0:24. Any reason?

good question... wonder why... voices certainly sound lower at that point...   perhaps its to let the viewer read the text on the display?
Oh I see, so this is video for dummies that doesn't know how to use pause key/button....

maybe it was hashing at 2 TH after all , and it only seemed slower because the video was slowed down ;-)

legendary
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
Video slows down at 0:24. Any reason?

good question... wonder why... voices certainly sound lower at that point...   perhaps its to let the viewer read the text on the display?
Oh I see, so this is video for dummies that doesn't know how to use pause key/button....
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 504
Run a Bitcoin node.
Congrats CoinTerra, this is exciting news!
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Video slows down at 0:24. Any reason?

good question... wonder why... voices certainly sound lower at that point...   perhaps its to let the viewer read the text on the display?
legendary
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
Video slows down at 0:24. Any reason?
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Congrats to Ravi, and the Cointerra team. Well deserved, and props for an accurate work utility rate displayed.

Haha those fans, sounds like an aircraft!!

(And congrats Jez Wink )

those fans do sound pretty loud.  the stats say 4000 rpm on their demo vid which must be all the way up...  but presumably they can slow them down when they don't need so much cooling

so which country are you in this week alex?

In the Uk as I had some killer jet lag, and had promised some written work for a deadline, now returning to Sweden. Are you going to the Miami meet?

definitely..!  lets have that drink..

-- Jez
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Congrats to Ravi, and the Cointerra team. Well deserved, and props for an accurate work utility rate displayed.

Haha those fans, sounds like an aircraft!!

(And congrats Jez Wink )

those fans do sound pretty loud.  the stats say 4000 rpm on their demo vid which must be all the way up...  but presumably they can slow them down when they don't need so much cooling

so which country are you in this week alex?



In the Uk as I had some killer jet lag, and had promised some written work for a deadline, now returning to Sweden. Are you going to the Miami meet?
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Congrats to Ravi, and the Cointerra team. Well deserved, and props for an accurate work utility rate displayed.

Haha those fans, sounds like an aircraft!!

(And congrats Jez Wink )

those fans do sound pretty loud.  the stats say 4000 rpm on their demo vid which must be all the way up...  but presumably they can slow them down when they don't need so much cooling

so which country are you in this week alex?

staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
The address used with Eligius was 1CTtm4iiwqt35Rgew1DQW6Yo3 as far as I could see. That's not a complete address. The rest wouldn't fit in the window. I looked on Eligius's Contributors page (http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/topcontributors.php) and couldn't find that, so I'm guessing they shut down the miner (or pointed it at a different pool) at least 3 hours ago.
Or they punched in the address wrong and it was invalid.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Congrats to Ravi, and the Cointerra team, well deserved and props for an accurate work utility rate displayed.

Haha those fans, sounds like an aircraft!!

(And congrats Jez Wink )

Power consumption?
hero member
Activity: 702
Merit: 500
Humm...I'm a bit disappointed, I was hoping to see better than planned results by this point.  They're not following in KnC's footsteps of "under-promise-over-deliver" as I was hoping they would be.

edit - side note...those fans are totally overkill....I LOVE IT!  Grin

really?  at 1.6 TH in a 4U single box, you're a bit disappointed ?   they just showed proof... working... the fastest, lowest cost, and smallest working bitcoin mining box that has ever existed... running with only four chips and by the looks of it, at 70 degrees according to their stats, they're not even breaking a sweat....  and you're disappointed?     And they said each day their engineers make it go faster...

they've literally gone from yesterday not being in the mining business... to today, having an extremely impressive box...  hashing faster than any box I've ever seen... that i would happily take delivery of tomorrow...!

I'm fully expecting them to continue tweaking to hit their goals, aren't you?   And whats more..  if i could, id take it right now this second running at only 1.6TH!... as it stands.. wouldn't you?

this proof has literally de-risked my entire order with them.  i now know the chip works.. the board works... the software works... the power supplies work.. the cooling works... and... that they all work together in one box.    Now all they're doing is tweaking it to go 20% faster before they ship it?  heck, thats the smallest leap of faith I've ever been asked to make.

I'm pretty happy with what they showed...

newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
Humm...I'm a bit disappointed, I was hoping to see better than planned results by this point.  They're not following in KnC's footsteps of "under-promise-over-deliver" as I was hoping they would be.

edit - side note...those fans are totally overkill....I LOVE IT!  Grin
Pages:
Jump to: