From what I understand, HashFast dug their own grave when they lied outright to customers about delivery dates - something about promising on-track up until the day they busted their deadline, and didn't mention to anyone that they were actually two or three months behind schedule (at best)? And also retconning customer terms to change refund policies?
For the record, I have never had anything invested in either Hashfast or Cointerra. I just think it's interesting that a business would continue operating for months on someone else's (unwitting, unvolunteered) dime without saying a word about it. Sure, the investors might have prior claim over customers. But you do not extract services from someone at a realtime rate knowing you will not be able to pay for those services. When you have debts from willing participants, you do not incur more debts from unwilling participants to cover them. You meet your contractual obligations, and the instant you know you will not be able to do so, you discuss the situation instead of fleecing. There were definitely things they could have done to avoid looking evil, and it appears they didn't attempt most of them. That's why people are shouting "scam".
Also for the record, you will never ever see me defending either casinos or cloudhashing operations for any reason. And people would probably hate you less if you were more polite instead of obnoxious or inflammatory. Make your point, make it well-formed and logical, and make it without namecalling. Insulting the immature means acting immature yourself, at which point you lose the higher ground.
What are you, my debate coach?
I'll make my points as I see fit, TYVM. If I make the discussion less dry by peppering it with banter, that is of educational benefit to readers who might not otherwise follow a humorless boring conversation. If you strenuously object to a little verbal jousting, fuck off and put me on ignore instead of whining pedantically about it.
Missing a delivery date isn't the same as lying. Cointerra and
many almost all other ASIC vendors have missed anticipated delivery dates. Designing and building the chips and board is hard, as is writing firmware and drivers, dealing with regulation/logistics/etc. So it would be foolish to take such dates as gospel deadlines.
Businesses operate on credit all the time. Credit lubricates the economy and makes the world go around. You must be new to this universe to not already be aware of such common knowledge. Cointerra, etc. did not know they would "not be able to pay" for services rendered. That depended on numerous unforeseeable random factors, like finding more investment and/or customers, the price of Bitcoin, network difficulty, etc.
These shopworn, long-debunked false premises annoy me, because I am fairly certain they are not made in good faith but rather to support the popular defamatory foregone conclusions of dishonesty and criminal motives.Now that I've explained the source of my hostility and vehemence, let's hope you can understand (if not forgive and henceforth applaud) it.
play nicely or I'll just lock the topic
You are new here, Mr. Newbie. This is BTCT. We thrive on/adore drama, and thus appreciate straightforward, honest rough and tumble. If you can't stand the heat, GTFO the kitchen.
When sidehack insults our intelligence with specious ignorance, he may expect to experience retaliatory insults. I am not a punching bag, and always hit back harder than the other guy when I know I'm right. That's why the 'ZOMG HashFast/Cointerra/100TH/iCEDRILL WAS A SCAM ALL ALONG!!!111!' sheeple absolutely despise me.
Turnabout is fair play. Go ahead, lock the thread if your constitution is too delicate for anything but patronizing namby-pamby gladhandling. Frankly, my dear, I don't GAS.