Keven, thanks for answering that. I've dealt with this matter when bulk analyzing email headers for work (don't ask), and know it can sometimes be a real pain.
As to whether you should put addresses in the comments is completely up to you. One thing I do recommend is if you are using ShapeShifter that you keep a file (I use PowerPoint) of screenshots of the transactions, because there is no way to reconstruct what happened.
Steve
Steve,
Thanks for thoughts on wallet address. I'm way to lazy for manual entry. The workaround I've come up with for eliminating possibility of duplicates from imports from post editing is really simple, I open the CSV file I'm getting ready to import first in a simple text editor and delete previous entries by date, save, and import. I'm manually correcting time stamps in CSV files as well because it's easier/faster to do so there.
Where I'm currently stumped now is on fees showing up in Realized & Unrealized Gains and it makes me think I'm doing something wrong with my wallet transfer entries. Or certainly possible I just don't understand, maybe report is showing me "potential" gains for fees? Doesn't seem logical. For example, say...
- I bought and shot 1 DASH from Poloniex to Bittrex with .01 TX "FEE"
- I have an "OUT" entry for 1 DASH with "FEE" of .01 DASH
- I have an "IN" entry for .99 DASH
- I traded ALL my DASH for BTC on Bittrex
Now, my balance for DASH shows 0, but on Realized & Unrealized Gains it shows .01 DASH. I have only done two of these types of transfers. The other is an "Exchange A to Exchange B transfer" of all of my LTC and then traded all for BTC. My LTC balance shows 0, but the LTC TX Fees appear in Realized & Unrealized Gains (same as DASH). So I know where the entries are coming from, I just don't know why. Please correct me if I'm doing something wrong. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Allan