Topic: Community opinion on Signature campaign spreadsheets - page 3. (Read 1375 times)
The spreadsheet must be public so that anyone can trace who has been accepted and who have not been. Also from the spreadsheet, there is a possible chance to detect scammer for joining the signature campaign with alter accounts.
I am not a fan of regulating companies in telling them how to run their business. They can run it as they see fit, and if they wish to make their private information public they can, and if they don't they shouldn't be forced to.
In a crypto world where everything is public on the chain, I don't see the reason to keep the spreadsheet related to bitcoin signature private.
A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, aeasy faster way to find abusers/spammers.
Yes and no, HCP was correct when he said, "If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post." The bigger thing I think having a public spreadsheet is for keeping an eye on the manager.A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, a
I'm not sure about it. What do you mean? Do you mean look if a manager is bad on managing or if a manager let cheaters on campaigns?
I think the main reason to get the public spreadsheet is to spot cheaters.
The second reason is to verify if a manager is good or not (looking for cheaters/spammer/whatever on the spreadsheet) but we are all humans and everyone can't control everything, keep also in mind on the 99% of campaigns we will have abusers on them and they are pretty easy to find if the spreadsheet is open.
Edit, for example, your spreadsheets are open and I've probably already found one RING of high-rank members on your signature campaigns.
(if you want I will post the RING 2morrow now it's late here)
(forgot to say I voted YES)
Went with the "Who Cares" option. I kinda disagreed with this earlier considering the Stake's campaign sheet was not public and the campaign was managed through telegram but actually, it doesn't really matter the sheet is public or private as long as the campaign isn't promoting spam on the forum. I wouldn't want to know how much a member got paid last week for his signature campaign. The quality of the campaign is evident from its posters anyway.
I don't think that really matters. For transparency it's good to have public spreadsheets. It helps to find abusers and spammers easier. But I see nothing wrong when company decide not to have public spreadsheet. There is no rule which would force to keep this information in public. If campaign is managed professionally, people who don't participate in campaign won't find nothing useful and interesting in these documents. For example, I'm not interested see post count, payments and Bitcoin addresses of Chipmixer campaign participants.
Voted on Yes,
Explanation:
Since signature campaign directly promoting on forum the spreadsheet should be public. There is two reason from my side,
1. Reporters could directly report if any managers encourage spam, no need to visit all over forum.
2. Others users will able to see that managers accepting right person and transparency of campaign management.
Explanation:
Since signature campaign directly promoting on forum the spreadsheet should be public. There is two reason from my side,
1. Reporters could directly report if any managers encourage spam, no need to visit all over forum.
2. Others users will able to see that managers accepting right person and transparency of campaign management.
In a crypto world where everything is public on the chain, I don't see the reason to keep the spreadsheet related to bitcoin signature private.
A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, aeasy faster way to find abusers/spammers.
Yes and no, HCP was correct when he said, "If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post." The bigger thing I think having a public spreadsheet is for keeping an eye on the manager. A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, a
In a crypto world where everything is verificable on the chain, I don't see the reason to keep the spreadsheet related to bitcoin signature private.
A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, aneasy faster way to find abusers/spammers.
A public spreadsheet it's only a plus for the community, an
Doesn't matter for me if it's public or private but in the first place, why spreadsheets should be in private? There are some cases in the past wherein some generous people here caught multiple accounts owned by a same person joining and abusing various campaigns and that work were made quiet easy because of those public spreadsheets as reference. That's a big help to the manager itself.
The sheet is a simple list of all the participants, their posting stats per week ,payments etc. How come that info should be private? What's the risks of having a public spreadsheet? What's are those things that must be hidden? Can someone enlightened us here or those managers itself that choose to hide it?
The sheet is a simple list of all the participants, their posting stats per week ,payments etc. How come that info should be private? What's the risks of having a public spreadsheet? What's are those things that must be hidden? Can someone enlightened us here or those managers itself that choose to hide it?
I don't understand why it would need to be public? 
If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post. I don't understand why having access to a spreadsheet would make any difference?
Is it because the self-styled "forum police" want to be able to find all the users of any given campaign easily so they can go and check their post quality? Personally, unless I actually see shitposting/spamming in the boards/threads that I am looking at because I actually want to be reading that board/thread, I don't care.
If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post. I don't understand why having access to a spreadsheet would make any difference?
Is it because the self-styled "forum police" want to be able to find all the users of any given campaign easily so they can go and check their post quality? Personally, unless I actually see shitposting/spamming in the boards/threads that I am looking at because I actually want to be reading that board/thread, I don't care.
Excellent response and proof that this poll is a good idea. Opinions are gonna vary. Keep the responses coming guys. It's not forum policy that spreadsheets be public, but depending on community response it might be an "unofficial rule" or it might not.
I don't understand why it would need to be public?
If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post. I don't understand why having access to a spreadsheet would make any difference?
Is it because the self-styled "forum police" want to be able to find all the users of any given campaign easily so they can go and check their post quality? Personally, unless I actually see shitposting/spamming in the boards/threads that I am looking at because I actually want to be reading that board/thread, I don't care.
If you see spam, regardless of whether or not there is a sig attached... simply click the "report to moderator" link and report the post. I don't understand why having access to a spreadsheet would make any difference?
Is it because the self-styled "forum police" want to be able to find all the users of any given campaign easily so they can go and check their post quality? Personally, unless I actually see shitposting/spamming in the boards/threads that I am looking at because I actually want to be reading that board/thread, I don't care.
The question is pretty simple with a couple added voting options in case users want to add a little fun. Whatever your vote is(even if you chose 1 of the 2 fun options), please back up your opinion with reasons as to why 1 way or the other.
This poll has been created due to Stake.com Signature campaign. I believe that since the website is using the bitcointalk platform to advertise their website, that all information regarding the campaign should be made public. This will help the reporters to keep an eye on participants applying for and being accepted into signature campaigns.
I'm not gonna make a super huge thread about the topic. The question is posted and your opinions are needed.
***EDIT***
It appears Stake has added a spreadsheet for all to see within the last hour. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OGQBpBWDy_2N6flWRmeQ3oJbxSvDXD_rpkbPNMVHo7Q/edit#gid=1373140560
Here is the sheet in case anyone is interested.
I would still like to hear and read community opinions on this matter. Remember, please back up your vote. This is a question about all campaigns, not just the 1 mentioned.
This poll has been created due to Stake.com Signature campaign. I believe that since the website is using the bitcointalk platform to advertise their website, that all information regarding the campaign should be made public. This will help the reporters to keep an eye on participants applying for and being accepted into signature campaigns.
I'm not gonna make a super huge thread about the topic. The question is posted and your opinions are needed.
***EDIT***
It appears Stake has added a spreadsheet for all to see within the last hour. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OGQBpBWDy_2N6flWRmeQ3oJbxSvDXD_rpkbPNMVHo7Q/edit#gid=1373140560
Here is the sheet in case anyone is interested.
I would still like to hear and read community opinions on this matter. Remember, please back up your vote. This is a question about all campaigns, not just the 1 mentioned.
Jump to: