**this post inspired by Annon001**
Conflict of interest must be avoided
Hi Sirs,
While looking through the forum Archives, I found a thread entitled
[WTS] Senior Account Delete Me Please by DT1 member
Blazed. The thread can be
viewed by clicking on this
link. The last post in the thread indicated the forum account was sold.
Much of the DT controversy is concentrated in those on Blazed's trust list.
Take
yahoo62278 for instance. He has created threads such as:
So this guy is a trust farming, begging, account seller. He has a decent amount of trust, his score is
50: -0 / +5, with 4 of the 5 ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list. He also runs many signature campaigns, can we be sure he is not enrolling his own accounts to milk the owners of these campaigns?
Here is the kicker, he is now giving negative trust for "sold accounts". This looks a lot like a conflict of interest to me. It looks a lot like he is "red tagging" some of his competition.
Another good example is
Lutpin. He created a thread entitled:
This guy doesn't appear to sell accounts or farm trust, but he is another signature campaign manager. His history indicates he was a little immature in the past, but hey, everyone needs to learn at one point. He seems to have handled a decent amount of other's money, so maybe he is a little trustworthy, his score is
110: -0 / +11 , with 7 of his 11 ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list.
A third point of controversy is
The Pharmacist. He is not the smartest person, claiming to
not know how to take a screenshot. I don't see much evidence he is especially trustworthy, he seems to have done a handful of PayPal deals, each worth $25 or so. From what I can tell, he has done a total of about $1,000 worth of trades over about three years. His trust score is
32: -0 / +5 , with 4 of his 5 ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list. He likes to leave negative trust for those that trade accounts, sometimes years after the fact, yet is
inconsistant in what he will Red Tag users for, and will ignore requests to discuss concerns with ratings.
User
actmyname is controversial enough, and has a low enough accuracy is his ratings that theymos excluded actmyname from his trust list:
I think that actmyname has been too hasty with some of his negatives, but I haven't had time to look carefully enough into it to justify making forceful changes. I did exclude actmyname from my trust list, so another DT1 could remove him from the default trust network by doing the same.
actmyname doesn't run any signature campaigns, but does Red Tag many users who "abuse bounty campaigns" and who trade forum accounts. He has only completed a handful of trades, and his trust score is
18: -0 / +2, with
all of his ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list.
Member
mexxer-2, apparently
used to sell forum accounts himself, however some people say mexxer-2 is actually a purchased account that was purchased after these types of threads was created. He allegedly failed to repay a loan from Lutpin, although no evidence to support this has been posted, he has negative ratings for this, however has no ratings for his prior activity selling accounts (or buying his account, depending on who you believe).
User
Lauda is by far the most controversial user in DT. He
enquired about deleting all personal information hosted on the forum, not long before it was
exposed that Lauda had attempted to buy forum accounts 10 at a time. He has been involved in at least one
extortion attempt. He
says he will send merit for any reason he wants, while using his Red Tagging abilities to punish those who he circumstantially believes are sending merit for reasons he does not agree with. He selectively Red Tags people engaged in account trading, even though he previously, without a doubt engaged in this very same activity in the past, and may well still be engaged in this activity.
Lauda's trust score has taken a little bit of a hit since his extortion scheme was exposed, falling to
2: -2 / +13 with two scam reports, with Lauda retaliating with a baseless Red Tag of his own, and smearing both those who left negative trust in relation to this. However if you exclude everyone on Blazed's trust list, his trust score falls to
: -2 / +4.
TL;DR: multiple people on Blazed's trust list have sold forum accounts in the past, including Blazed, yet none of them have Red Tagged anyone on Blazed's trust list for this reason, despite many leaving thousands of Red Tags for this reason, sometimes looking back many years to find this activity. Multiple people are on Blazed's trust list that manage signature/bounty campaigns, and many others use their DT status to "help" signature/bounty campaign managers by giving Red Trust to "cheaters".
Lastly, and most importantly, many people on Blazed's trust list seem to all have positive trust from each other, none have negative trust from each other (with the exception of mexxer-2, for a loan default, which should be easy to prove, but hasn't been), despite many engaging in the very behavior that they leave Red Trust for.
I guess I would ask Blazed, What is going on here?
Thank you for reading.
P.S. I am new here
