Topic: Cool mining set up that more miners should copy. (Read 339 times)

If we talk about this 6% jump it means that miners were bullish 6 months ago! 

6% at 400 exa is around 240 000 Asics, that's something around 720 MW, you don't set up things like this overnight.
If you go through press releases from Riot or Mara or other big players you will see some of them have already listed their plans for q4 2023 or een q1 2024, some are going all out some are just restructuring and some are just dropping their gear or returning it, like Core did to extinguish 40 millions of debt.


Now, the problem! Is it really cheap? Because nobody is mentioning any price!


Hihi, that triggers memories, yeah, been there, done that and now I only have three miners in the basement, because with all subsidies for biofuel, with another set of subsidies for reducing energy demand through this, we still ended up this year barely a few cents under what the grid operator charges, so we would rather make heating pellets and sell them than burn it for electricity. And this is Europe, no way in hell you're going to compete with a gas or coal plant in the US without someone taking all the initial cost off your shoulders or the government actively subsidizing your business.

I wish it was me.

Miners with good power setups are endlessly bullish.
I profit as I type. Less profit then last month but still profit.

A miner with good power cost can structure certain profits as long as he or she is not a greedy moron.

As to big crazy profits like a buy and hold for 10 years no as it is more work to mine with less risk and lower profit than it is to buy and hodl for ten years.

Look at the diff rate today we are up 6% as I type.

https://newhedge.io/terminal/bitcoin/difficulty-estimator

Latest Block:   804555  (23 minutes ago)

Current Pace:   106.8591%  (172 / 160.96 expected, 11.04 ahead)

Previous Difficulty:   52391178981379.36                           
Current Difficulty:   55621444139429.57                           
Next Difficulty:   between 56316973197977 and 60170541114438
Next Difficulty Change:   between +1.2505% and +8.1787%
Previous Retarget:   Yesterday at 12:57 PM  (+6.1657%)
Next Retarget (earliest):   September 4, 2023 at 3:22 PM  (in 11d 23h 36m 21s)
Next Retarget (latest):   September 5, 2023 at 9:25 AM  (in 12d 17h 39m 0s)
Projected Epoch Length:   between 13d 2h 25m 57s and 13d 20h 28m 36s

Copy stats to clipboard


A lot of this growth is 3 and 4 cent power guys trying to push out all people over 6 cent power.

Bump!

Is this you, philipma1957?

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/nodal-power-secures-13-million-seed-round-to-drive-renewable-energy-transformation-at-landfills

 

Using the methane processed from waste to produce cheap energy for mining Bitcoin will probably be the next popular narrative during the next bull cycle. So if some Bitcoiners don't want to trade shitcoins, then perhaps if given the opportunity, maybe investing in clean energy mining-related stocks might be a better alternative?

Plus difficulty went up by 6%, but the price is currently down again. The miners are more bullish than the speculators?

You're right, but the point of the project is about the diversion of the waste. Instead of having something thrown somewhere, why not burn it and produce something with it?

If you're a miner and could have the opportunity to add the concept to your farm, why not? The concept could be more about helping the community around where you do business, than adding more Bitcoin to your profits. Breaking even after costs from such a project could, for me, be considered a success because it diverted waste into something more productive.

17 million population, 8 litre consumtion, 9.2 kWh per liter

So you have 72kwh per capita, that's 1 day of running an s19, but running 24/365 you will power about 40 000 with all the oil in the country.

Now this happens only:
- nobody eats a gram of that oil, not a gram is lost while frying, and all the oil that is used goes into the generator
- used oil has the same qualities as raw vegetable oil
- the machines are perfectly efficient

Since none of this is actually happening as half is eaten as it is and just by frying you lose up to 25% of the oil, and around 33% of its calorific value, and the efficiency is in the 30%, the numbers will probably be in the low thousands for the entire country!
So 1/2, 75%, 66%, 30%, and 40 becomes 3.

Now let's split the income of 1000 S19 to 17 million people, yeah, you got 15 cents a year!

Those miners will die fast, there is no filters and they are opened to that type of weather, what happens when the wind blows? Cool air? Bust way more dusty, no this is not whey I expected to see, I was expecting something more advanced, get a better cooling system in a safer environment, not out in the open, Asic miners are not built to face any form of humidity, they will die in no time, good luck.

Air filters, Dust free environment, good power and you are good to keep your mining operation alive, not this.

Okay like I said when I was in the US Navy the P.I. had a big base near Subic Bay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Naval_Base_Subic_Bay

at Olongapo.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olongapo


The port has hundreds of bars and hookers in the 1000's

If
a) mining was around in 1978
b) some sailor would have done the setup with his hired hooker as the supervisor
c) oil would be provided by the bars as lots of foods were deep fried.
d) a few sailors would have help smuggle the miners
e) a few other sailors would have handled the generator

most payments for the sailors would be free women.

I spent enough time there to know this would have happened.

So it may only be 10 miners doing 50th each, but that is around 35 dollars a day which is big money for a poor sailors port.

And it is not scalable ie 100 miners is not going to happen.  But s17's at low 10 can be done.

A rich country like Russia can build all the power plants they need, Kosovo or any other not-so-rich country, well probably not much.


Phill, for all I know, if it was feasible to generate power using used cooking oil, then oil would not be cheap, imagine it made economical sense to generate 1kw with every human fart, I bet you that nobody would fart for free anymore, so given that cooking oil is free automatically results in a no-go, and it has probably to do with what you mentioned (the generator) so while oil is free, the rest of the things you need are not, so the cost of generating power using cooking oil is most certainly higher than the other methods.

There are some exceptions of course, let's say you are a retired mechanic, you have an oil generator that sits there doing nothing, has no market value, and there is a KFC down the road from where you live, then ya, by all means, using cooking oil to mine would make sense, but how many people have all those things combined? especially the KFC thing.

There is a huge difference between someone living next to a river which they can drop in a turbine and power up their TV, and someone who lives in a desert and has to dig up a river all the way to the nearest lake, most people don't live next door to rivers, most people don't have a power generator sitting at the back yard, oh, and probably most KFCs don't change oil too often, so you need a lot of stars to align so can mine bitcoin using cooking oil.

Getting old cooking oil forever (years) can be done.

 So I would argue the 'free' fuel could be endless (well for 10 years or more)

But running a generator for 10 years I am not so sure.

Getting the gear could be easy.

A farm could dump gear the cost would be shipping it.

I could give the guy m10's, s15's, t15's for shipping cost and a few dollars.

When I was in the navy I could move a reasonable amount of gear from port to port.

There were no miners in 1978, but if there were and a Philippine had the setup above I could get them 5 miners every year or so.

People can make do. When all they have to give is labor the chance to burn the old oil as fuel and make a few more dollars would mean they would.

I do think the stumbling block would be the generator not the fuel not the miners not the labor.

Yeah the mining gear would die off fast 1-2 years at best.

But the generator is a big cost. Hard to replace.

Oh, the irony!
Just had a power failure while writing this post, I was going to kill somebody if the ups would have failed and lost it.


Because scaling is a b1tch!
What works for a hobby miner it becomes impossible to run when you multiply it by a dozen.
1 S9? I can run it in my bathroom! 20? I will turn off the power on the street, my neighbors will call the police and I won't be able to hear even 10 cops cars over the noise, and probably from the heat my bathtub will melt before they arrive!

Same here, you got enough power for 5kw miners, how do you get the cheap or zero cooking oil for more?
It's like living on soda cans, you can pick a few hundred each day but can you pick 10 000 a day? Scaling!


I've seen this so many times I kind of stopped paying attention to it!
Somehow magically investing $200 to get $200 is great in Somalia and investing $5000 to get $5000 is bad in the US or EU, don't know by what logic, don't know how this keeps getting spotted even if it's not simply about mining but about investing too, like some guy who can barely afford 20$ will strike it rich unlike the one affording $5000 cause....reasons!


It will work only on a small scale.

For example, at our farm, we harvest willows and combine it with straws to make pellets, we sell those but we could fire them up and power a generator, it would work for us on our production but if we try to get over that, buying it or investing in planting more trees more land would bring the cost of home generation over the grid costs, and we're talking EU grid prices!
This, and allow me to quote you, "whatever shit' is just meme material!
Love the "Kaboom" sign on that fence!  



How cheap and, more importantly, how much!
Cause you can have cheap energy for industries like Iceland, but there are only 18Twh of them overall, The US has 4000Twh!


That's exactly what Mikey said also, he invested 100$ to get a few satoshi and earn 20$ extra per month, now if that miner fails...
Fliping burgers 100km away in Sofia and he will be better!

Exactly the point I am trying to make, cheap electricity, what is the percentage of low-income countries that have cheap and somehow excessive electricity? 1-5% ? the two countries that you named are RICH in energy, Kosovo sits on a TON of coal and uses that coal to produce the vast majority of its energy, and Russia sits on a TON of everything that generates electricity, but what about the rest of the low-income countries? how many countries in Asia, Africa or South America have very low income and cheap electricity? I highly doubt if we were to run the numbers that we would get to anything above 10%, so mining could be good for 10% of the low-income countries.

You're right, but at the same time, there are places where electricity is close to free, and minimum incomes are low. People who earn more than the minimum income there can accumulate cheap, second-hand ASICs from a long-term perspective. There are also those who back in a days bought L3s (for example) at 70-80 usd, who mined on Nicehash or converted their LTC/DOGE into BTC and sold during the last bull run, must have been very pleased. Or with a 100 usd S9, actualy you earn 0.00090849BTC per month approximately, ROI would be 5-6 months with a dirty cheap electricity. It makes sense for someone which is almost not paying electricity, even with the rise of difficulty. So if the said guy accumulated cheap S9s or S15s for example, when difficulty was lower, it could be profitable for him.

 For example, I was recently in Kosovo, with someone who had very very cheap electricity. He collects the cheapest ASICs possible, and has been accumulating them for a long time (several years). This gives him an income that's not insignificant back home (minimum wage more or less 200 EUR in Kosovo if I'm not wrong). Of course, we're not talking about mining on an industrial scale, but what I was trying to say is that over the long term, some people manage to obtain a small amount of sats that is not insignificant in proportion to their country's minimum income.

It's much the same in Russia, where there's industrial mining that requires a lot of resources and investment. But you also meet people who have a few dozen ASICs accumulated over the years that generate an income that would enable them to live a little more comfortably.

Of course, this isn't possible overnight, but I sincerely believe that places where the cost of living is low, and electricity affordable, are one of the few interesting opportunities for 'pleb' mining, even if it doesn't even represent 1% of the total hashrate and is insignificant in the proportion of the total hashrate.

I can give my personnal situation as an example. Where I live, incomes are low, but if you manage to earn 100 EUR a month, you can already say that your rent is paid in most of cities. That's appreciable, even for people who earn more than the minimum wage. Personaly, when I work, I earn like 6-7 times the minimum legal salary, so I could afford to buy more ASICs from time to time.
My mining farm is not crazy big, but thanks to it, if I wanted, I could stop working now and just sell my BTC each month, and live in a very comfortable way as long as the difficulty stays in her actual range. It wouldn't be possible in a Westerner country or in a country where cost of living is high. So keeping all these accumulated sats aside for the long term makes a lot of sense in my situation. It's almost free DCA, insofar as my ASICs are already profitable.

On the other hand, from a professional, stable and industrial mining point of view, I totally agree with you. But that doesn't mean those guys who make the equivalent of a minimum income in "BTC Savings" every month don't exist, and in their case, if they accumulate these sats and sell in bullrun, it can be a very profitable game for them. Even if it's on a small scale, the ratio of earnings to cost of living could be to their advantage

How tho? I can't see how mining is a game changer for low-income countries, if the miner generates enough money for them it means the cost of buying and running that miner is also high with respect to their income, someone who lives in a rich country can save enough money in a week to buy a used miner for $500 without having to starve, someone in a poor country will need to work for months and months to afford that same miner.

So really it's pretty much the same equation if you can easily afford to buy the miner - the income will be little to nothing, if the income is good, then you can't easily afford to buy the miner.

In fact, if anything, one could argue that BTC mining favors the rich countries, people in rich countries have access to a lot of money, have excessive electricity which they can access,  in a pool/low-income country, none of that exists, and supply of electricity is probably not close to cover basic needs, expensive, unreliable, no source of funds to pursue any meaningful mining operation.

As for these folks using cooking oil or whatever shit -- none of these methods are sustainable or feasible, you may come up with whatever way of generating electricity, but as long as the other folks can generate it a lot cheaper by burning coal or gas, it makes no sense, you are essentially competing against every other miner, whoever finds a way to make the cheapest electricity will win in the long run.

There is a good reason why U.S miners could not compete against the Chinese, the Chinese had access to cheaper power and a lot of money, and so they did sit on the mining throne from the get-go until China banned miners, as soon as that happened, the second most potential country was the U.S, they have a lot of money and cheap power (not cheaper than China but cheaper than most other potential countries).

Now the U.S is taking the lead, who else can compete against them now that China is gone? Russia, Russia has a lot of money and cheap power, how cheap? we don't know, but the bottom line is that you need both MONEY and CHEAP POEWR to benefit from BTC mining, which is why only countries with those two elements can afford to heavily mine bitcoin.

That is awesome. Reminds of the Bitcoin "shitcoin" mining farm in Slovakia that made the news a while back, where they convert human and animal waste into hash rate... but less smelly!

I'd assume that is true as long as they can access cheap electricity. If they don't, then it will probably be as expensive, if not more expensive, than in other countries. My country has relatively cheap electricity, but people would need to spend a lot of money to set up their RIG and wait months before they break even. Not sure if they can do the same thing as OP shared though.

I agree, especially if you take into account the local minimum wage. I've looked, and found several sources that are a bit contradictory. However, if I take the source that gives me the highest daily minimum wage in Guatemala, I come up with 101.05 GTQ for a day of 8 hours' work, which gives me around 12.94 USD.

So 765 USD profit is not negligible, it would be like two months of local minimum wage.

Where I have a little more doubt is on the ability of these ASICs to last over time in a stable manner if they don't bother to monitor humidity.
Just as, to get the numbers mentioned above, they'd have to be able to keep them running 24/7, and I don't think that's the case.

In any case, this is further proof that in low-income countries, BTC mining can be a game changer.

Well its never cold in Guatemala so they only worry about humidity.

The gear will last about a year s9's are waste scrap.

The oil is waste scrap.

They may not have a recycle program for it.


So if the oil is free just come and get it.

And the s9's were purchased for 100 each.

they make 1 dollar a day. They should last 300 days.

So turn 100 into 300 over 300 days.  It works in a poor country.

After looking at the photo it looks like 1 s9 and 1 s17 or 65th that's about 4.50 a day.

you could but that gear if lucky as low as 100+500 = 600

300 x 4.55 = 1365 so a profit of 765

if oil = free
if generator was surplus doing nothing.

a lot of labor.

The replies in the topic are both positive and negative. For those who replied negatively, listen, it's probably just a prototype showing that it could be done. Because why not, right? If they could run it more efficient enough to actually make some profit, they could be starting a new kind of small scale business for used oil disposal. It's very amazing that Bitcoin could fill in gaps and incentivize people to make some facets of the real world more efficient. Don't shut your minds from ideas.

If it's actually feasible to do as a profitable business is a different debate. Perhaps philipma1957 could give us his personal opinion.

Yeah, you can see a roof on the video, but you're right, in the event of a storm or rain, the humidity must be terrible.

Maybe they only mine part-time with this infrastructure and put them under cover during bad weather? It sounds like a lot of extra work, but at the same time they don't seem to have many ASICs, so it must be feasible.

Apart from that I find the concept interesting, I'd love to be able to recycle a polluting and wasteful resource to power some Antminers. Even if it's only two or three S9s, for example, they're will give satoshis that are practically free, and many of us (at least in my case) have old ASICs that have long since paid for themselves, which we could "sacrifice" for such a project.

I do not really see any significant advantage to this method, to be honest. Sure, it takes advantage of waste vegetable oil that would otherwise go to waste or harm the environment, but isn't burning oil even worse for the environment? On top of that, the actual effectiveness of such a generator is seriously up in the air.

In my book, a smarter approach would be to store that oil and put it to good use in a different way. How about using it to heat buildings or greenhouses during those chilly winter months? Not only would it be more eco-friendly, but it would also serve a practical purpose.