Pages:
Author

Topic: Coronavirus tests include the common cold. Typically 20% positive. (Read 646 times)

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot

Btw, I bet you think you're a monkey because 97% of your DNA is the same as a monkey's. Grin

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Simone lost her job for this introduction. And the video was kicked off Youtube. Watch it here https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.

https://altcensored.com/

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139

There are much to know as per the statistics, strains and chains of the Covid19 situation.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!

You two should go play a game of tiddlywinks for lunch money.  I'd bet on you in that particular contest.



They could always test each other for Covid-19.     Cool
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!

You two should go play a game of tiddlywinks for lunch money.  I'd bet on you in that particular contest.

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.


That's certainly an interesting observation, Jesus Wanky2!
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
...

Jesus wanky1!  Children should be seen and not heard.  You obviously have no fucking clue what the adults are talking about here.

legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?

One would take it for granted that the RT-PCR tests were primered with sequences which were unique to SARS-cov-2.  I sure did.  Now I am reading from some doctors that all they detect is general coronavirus.  And even that is hit-n-miss...since, again, they are pushing the cycles way up to the no-go zone where nothing is very accurate.

even as far back as christmas. lab techs were actually doing proper analysis and actually verified that it was not just 'normal' / general corona virus

some labs have tried to ramp up speeds of testing more people faster. but this has taken time. yes mistakes were made. but they didnt just carry on using machines that made mistakes..
its why for instance in the UK once they found a nice accurate level. they then made many machines to multiply how many tests they can sample at once.

think about computing analogy CPU. once they get to the limit of speed per core then then multiply the cores. and then make servers of multiple boards . a super computer is not a single core processor being ran at super speed.

these 'mega labs' dont just have one machine running super fast..

..
in some developing countries. they did use outdated tech. but that was more because of a 'better than nothing' atleast they would know it was a virus and not bacterial/panic attac/asthma
however as the days/weeks pass it is show that even those developing countries are getting access to the accurate machines

also hopsitals keep samples of the patients even after release/decease so if there are any inconsistancies they can retest.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?

One would take it for granted that the RT-PCR tests were primered with sequences which were unique to SARS-cov-2.  I sure did.  Now I am reading from some doctors that all they detect is general coronavirus.  And even that is hit-n-miss...since, again, they are pushing the cycles way up to the no-go zone where nothing is very accurate.

Two things have struck me about this whole thing:

 - One is that some countries (esp, the U.S.) seemed to consistently do everything right...if the goal WAS to achieve a high infection rate, and

 - The testing methods have been a comedy of 'errors' (which look a lot more like sabotage frankly) from day one and remain so here well into the 2nd quarter.  This allowed what may well be literally nothing at all of any actual threat to become blown up in the mainstream media and world governments as the biggest plague in known history.

sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 262
This is a very important topic for discussion. If it is true that the tests test positive for many different viruses, maybe that is why the government delayed allowing companies to produce the tests for a month.

I'm still looking in to it, but if the RT-PCR tests grow more DNA/RNA, doesn't that RNA still have to be analyzed to determine what kind of virus it is?
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
The best way to figure out if it was true or not would be to find the amount of people with respiratory problems in 2020 who were diagnosed with coronavirus (the common cold).

If that number suddenly dropped to near zero since they started testing for COVID-19, then you have your answer. They are showing positive anyone who has any coronavirus, not just COVID-19.

I have not been able to track down that number for 2020 though, only the past data showing 20% of people with respiratory problems testing positive.

While at the same time, 13.5% of Americans with respiratory problems tested positive for COVID-19.

people with the common cold do not end up needing to be sedated and put onto ventilators like those with covid do

doctors know the difference between the common cold and covid. they actually do have separate symptomology and different pathogens and many other things.
but im guessing you believe no one is an expert unless they are investing into a seastead
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

your conspiracy is based on conspiracy scripts from january. theres been new tests since then

UK NHS patients are getting tested with these. thats the whole point of the delay by self isolating and why only having enough for patients and not enough for full population

go research and update yourself a bit

Even if my points are based on their conspiracy, the update is that an accurate test takes a long time and is expensive. That's why they are still using the old methods.

But that's only a little of it. Where did they get the methods? From the creator of CV. Who is the creator? Scientists in North Carolina... especially a DR. Shi Zhengli, at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Why would they do this? Their excuse is to find out how to protect against a real problem like CV. Of course, it would never be used on people, right?

Regarding this post, these creators are the people who are handing down the ways to test for it. The average doctor has no clue how to do this on his own. It would take years for him to research a way to do this. But testing methods were known years ago.

More details here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJjaQJTBTGU.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

your conspiracy is based on conspiracy scripts from january. theres been new tests since then

UK NHS patients are getting tested with these. thats the whole point of the delay by self isolating and why only having enough for patients and not enough for full population

go research and update yourself a bit
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot

Shows how little you know about the way Coronavirus testing is done at this stage.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

shows how little you know
i bet you think your a banana if they only tested 40%. and ud believe it.
you dont realise that its a combination method of not just one test. but multiple tests, scans and symptom diagnostics.

but you can paint your skin as yellow as you like and show a test that looks like it says your a banana.. but everyone will still diagnose you as an idiot
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
Too many massive quote blocks and text walls for me to read this thread. Maybe somebody could post a brief conclusion.

One thing I would like to point out is that most of the official reports state death counts as those dying with the Corona virus, and not from the virus. I'm still of the belief that the virus doesn't actually kill anybody, but it does affect the immune system, and therefore people with underlying health issues are not able to recover from them. One way that I can be wrong in this, is the case of smokers. Smoking increases the number of ACE-2 receptors, and this may enable the virus to stimulate so many anti-bodies, that the infected person drowns if they are not removed artificially.   

people dont die from corona due to cells bursting and causing blood loss.. they die much earlier from the suffocation.. which is due to KNOWN symptomology of being triggered by corona.
yes ARDS is the bodies immuno response. not the virus.. but they know that ARDS is triggered by corona as appose to say an anaphylactic shock which is another immuno response to an allergen like peanuts..

now as for your concern about the reporting.
doctors know if someone tested with corona develops respiratory issues and they have through tests ruled it out from being just a coincidental asthma attack (yea doctors are smart they can tel the difference)
so even if someone has underlying asthma.. they can spot the difference
if that patient does die due to ARDS knowing its corona triggered. they report it as such...

and because your in england and maybe want to know real facts about english numbers
ill post this quote to save repeating from another topic
(primer: ons: office national statistics.. DHSC: department health socalcare)
i told you this days ago.. but you have rejected finding the answer for yourself

what doctors diagnose and actually know and report goes to one department which then becomes the public release
lets call this A

the death certificate is created upto 5 days later and goees to another department
let call this B

what you seem to be obsessed with is thinking B is the public release stat.. its not
B is the department that takes ant ICD-10 of corona and puts it into their database for other reasons

if you charted it out

        _______ B
|___/
|     _________ A
|__/
|______________

this A is the list of those that die due to corona specific health symptoms and tested with corona
B is a list of any death cause. where corona tested positive


again for example of the UK
the ONS department is B.. media and worldometer and gov.uk do not report B(ons)
the DHSC department is A.. media and worldometer and gov.uk DO report A(DHSC)

you were told this days ago and had days to check it out

DHSC get data direct from doctors the day of death via the patients charts
ONS get it from death certificate deays later, which ONS then decides to group any death cause
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
but when someone dies with ARDS(acute respiratory distress) where even if its a patient with asthma. the signals signs and tests show its not an asthma attack. and then testing that its corona.. and then running other tests and ct scans further rules out asthma attack. mening offering asthma inhaler medication is bad, wrong and not reccommended.


Your whole point dies right here. Nobody knows for sure if CV is present. Why not? Because they test on "chunks" of any virus found in the person's system... not on the whole virus.

These same "chunks" appear in many viruses. So, how do they know that any of them are Coronavirus, since they haven't tested for the whole Coronavirus? Yet they say it's CV.

They are assuming, or downright lying.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
The best way to figure out if it was true or not would be to find the amount of people with respiratory problems in 2020 who were diagnosed with coronavirus (the common cold).

If that number suddenly dropped to near zero since they started testing for COVID-19, then you have your answer. They are showing positive anyone who has any coronavirus, not just COVID-19.

I have not been able to track down that number for 2020 though, only the past data showing 20% of people with respiratory problems testing positive.

While at the same time, 13.5% of Americans with respiratory problems tested positive for COVID-19.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Too many massive quote blocks and text walls for me to read this thread. Maybe somebody could post a brief conclusion.

One thing I would like to point out is that most of the official reports state death counts as those dying with the Corona virus, and not from the virus. I'm still of the belief that the virus doesn't actually kill anybody, but it does affect the immune system, and therefore people with underlying health issues are not able to recover from them. One way that I can be wrong in this, is the case of smokers. Smoking increases the number of ACE-2 receptors, and this may enable the virus to stimulate so many anti-bodies, that the infected person drowns if they are not removed artificially.   
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
but when someone dies with ARDS(acute respiratory distress) where even if its a patient with asthma. the signals signs and tests show its not an asthma attack. and then testing that its corona.. and then running other tests and ct scans further rules out asthma attack. mening offering asthma inhaler medication is bad, wrong and not reccommended.

 aswell as looking at other symptoms.. makes doctors. yep reallife ICU doctors who are trained.. yep not magic men. but doctors tell the difference.. and be abble to assess what actual medical interventions and meds should be used.


if that patient dies later due to ards where its ruled out an asthma attack.. then although its marked as underlying asthma.. the doctor knows it was ards that caused it due to corona.. so its reported as a corona death

.
but in your world im guessing you think a unicorn comes into hospital and poops out coloured pellets and depending on how many are red is how many to classify as corona..

yes your getting that ridiculous that im starting to imagine you as guy stuck in childish fantasy

i really dont think you know how hospitals function
Pages:
Jump to: