Topic: CORRUPT MODERATION - WHEN WILL IT STOP??? Clear example of one sided mods - page 2. (Read 922 times)

Use the "report to moderator" button if you feel that he is trolling, that's what the button is for. It's much more effective than creating a new thread every 10 minutes.



Having "observable instances of truth" doesn't mean you can act like a 7 year old and use childish nicknames.


Not meaning to troll here, this is a serious concern. Have you been diagnosed or suspected to have schizophrenia? You should seriously consider getting professional help.

Okay, well in that case, we no longer accuse you of double standards.

Opps i did not notice that he is referring you in that picture.
If that was his intention, then it is not right either.  

Haha I see so he can post the picture and infer that is me? I am not allowed to say that is his mother? I see a future DT members here. Great double standards.

Its the comments which you posted with the Picture which i was referring to be disrespectful.   

I agree with you posting pictures of those with genetic issues is very disrespectful. LFC Bitcoin is quite out of his shitposting mind posting that kind of thing here. Then again his other 12000 posts are pure shit so what else can be expected


@malboroza

that seems like an almost reasonable reply, I want to see which mod removed it, because it it were hilarious and co then surely I would not need to report his own post or cabalism13's post since he was quoting it.

why is it not transparent which mods remove the posts? this should be as standard?  when people say you need to PM the mod to ask why? how if you do not know which mod deleted i?

You can argue on which posts are off-topic . Also you have right to fight for the classification of Spam posts or  Mods Behavior but you have no right to disrespect anyone.  I mean you just don't deserve to be here.  

Mods are absolutely one-sided. They're on the side of enforcing the rules of the forum in a somewhat sane (if unreasonably lenient) manner. Obviously that's not the side you're on, but you can't please everyone.

Ok, I forced myself to read topic. Report post and write in comments "off topic reply", there is no need to make thread and drama about every single post you see. Cabalisms post indeed moved topic into different direction. Answer to question why your post was removed while some other are not is because someone reported your post and didn't report other posts. So go to that thread and report all post which are off topic, starting from this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50696752. Or simple send PM to users to remove off topic replies. Be polite while doing that.

LOL - like LFC with his autism and pics of his mother are not trollling? please answer clearly.

Why is referring to them as I deem appropriate trolling, if i can present observable instances of truth to explain if asked?  We notice many members refer to our friend cryptohunter as scunter, cryptocunt(er), etc. We did not notice him crying about trolling? and they could provide 0 evidence to explain their nicknames? that is more possibly trolling. Although not something I am sure he would worry about since it is a nit picking feeble attempt to avoid tackling the valueless content of their posts.

That has no bearing on the initial post.  Notildah may not be nutildah.  I mean it is hard to know which is worse. Is it best that he recognizes that selling his account is EVIL and that he advocates others get red trust for it, then goes on to sell his own in his mind to assist users scamming others?? but nobody was willing to pay 0.3btc for this bunch of shitposting?  or that he sold it and there is a new shitposter impersonating an old evil member according to him ready to scam us all ? Can you prove he IS nutildah? if so produce the conclusive proof?  if you can we will refer to it as nutildah the evil member in future.

Where is your council to the other members that change other members into childish nicknames? and they can not provide any observable instances to demonstrate the names are more suitable or that they insightful in anyway? can you please call out tman, pharmacist and all the others that start changing peoples user names as trolls? I will await you doing this right away in public.

Incorrect anway. I have already told you before that cleverly adapting a persons username to more accurately match with their observable behaviors is not trolling. BUT ONLY if you can provide evidence and observable instances to demonstrate this is true and holds up under scrutiny. You notice we have not given you a pet name. For now we have not observed you to trust abuse, or tell lies, or scam, or to sell your account. If we notice any observable instances of anything majorly untrustworthy then we may assign you a pet name.

For example we notice LFC_Bitcoin is a total shitposter. The VAST majority of his posts are 1 liners and speculations of the price of BTC with some other sports discussion.  I mean looking at his entire post history just sees a mass of 1 liner meaningless junk. We have not yet assigned him a more accurate name like some of the the others.  However,allowing members to believe this person has ever made posts that represent his inflated merit score is laughable. His entire post history is garbage. Go back through it all. There is NO value at all.

Please review his entire post history and pick out 5 original thought inspiring posts ...you will not they are all mostly 1 liner speculation junk, sports gambling drivel, and tales of him making cups of tea for his office bosses before he started a failing clothes business. He has achieved nothing for this community and is a waste of space. He is now a trust abuser, just because he does not like the truth about his meaningless and pointless past here being presented AFTER he attacks us with childish pics of his family and claims of autism ?

Now stop going off topic and just explain why that post was removed and none of the others were?  it was far more funny than the others and it only responded to what we consider to be false and biased opinions of the moderator.

We still await sensible explanation for the removal whilst the other posts of far less value in terms of humor remain.

Changing names into childish nicknames = trolling. Act like an adult and people will start treating you as one.

LFC_Bitcoin please stop posting pictures of your mother on my thread.

@TheNewAnon135246

More trolling about trolling?

Please provide some evidence of the trolling. Oh wait you won't. Just like LFC Bitcoin will not present any evidence of his best original thought inspiring posts. They do not exist. Present the instances of trolling for us to see. Can you not read the initial post ? or just too stupid to understand that your post needs some observable instances to substantiate it or it should not be here? Now present it ? we will wait.

Yes we wait for their explanation of how the above post broke the rules or required deletion when the other posts there quoted remain.

EDIT - WE NOTICE LFC BITCOIN JUST LEFT SOME RED TRUST ABUSE ON OUR ACCOUNT. WELL DONE LFC BITCOIN.  You clearly like assisting us demonstrate DT and the merit systems is a joke.  Obviously does not like being called out as an observable fool in public.

My guess is that most moderators consider you an annoying cunt since you have created a shitload of threads about the same subject and they are getting tired of your trolling.

Sorry to hear you are suffering again.

Read the OP. Try to work things out on your own. If you need assistance to enter the debate then ask your parents or career to help you form a sensible post.

My autism spectrum is going off again. cryptohunter, seriously what do you ever gain from making threads like this?

Same shit, different day.

 

More observable shit posters piling in with zero argument and zero reason to be here other than spamming their sigs.

I said no posting without evidence slobbering ass kisser.

Yogg the trust abuser and colluder with scammers and liars. Can you present the words that you are referring to? We can debate them on another thread. Do not derail this one.  If you maintain you are not a trust abuser, or observably colluding with scammers, liars and other trust abusers then please tell me so I can make another thread in rep for you to air your excuses there, whilst I demonstrate how untrustworthy you are.

Back on topic please. I want explanation of why my post was deleted. It is the funniest post ever quoted on that thread. Far more funny than the 2 others that I quoted there. One of which is just hilarious demonstrating he is not objective or impartial and will insist of proliferating the board with garbage he can not back up when called out. He just runs away. He has no examples of ANY false information that he can present that were contained with in our posts? but how is this possible if all of our posts are trolling and nonsense? 

Mods need to be able to explain post deletes in the full context of the thread. If not this is discrimination and deliberate silencing of observable events they do NOT want presented.

Just don't feed the troll, put it on ignore. 

Seems like you end up making your own definitions for some of the terms your using.
You are soo above all. Aren't you on Mars or something ?

You know even better than us, mere mortals, the definitions of the words you are using.
Keep on with your rants. That's going nowhere.. or maybe going above-all, who knows ? 
It goes above my head, that's for sure.

Ah an observable trust abuser comes to comment, an observable colluder with scammers and liars. Welcome yogg.

AND??  it does not matter if mods are one sided and collude with liars, scammers and members with clear double standards?

thanks for your insight.