Even when everyone is aware that corruption is occurring, authority is frequently entrenched, making it difficult to eradicate. People who gain from manipulating a system typically take efforts to stop others from destroying it. They always strengthen their position and increase their own authority. Education by itself is insufficient. People must take action at some time, which frequently entails using violence and civil unrest.
Topic: Corruption Should Be Taught From Young Age - page 3. (Read 1758 times)
Indeed socialization from an early age regarding corruption can have a positive impact on life in the future. It cannot be denied that corruption is a big problem. In my opinion, dissatisfaction with what is obtained from the work done is the initial factor for people to commit corruption. a thank you is not enough to repay hard work.
Obviously a word of thanks would not be enough to pay for any work today as they are just additional words to complete the payment of wages to each worker. I also agree with the matter of early socialization for corruption problems because it is also an effort to eradicate corruption from an early age before it continues to happen in the future, and things like a person's dissatisfaction with what he has done are because he cannot be grateful. existing income so that they still want to take the rights of others by committing corruption.
When a country is deeply rooted in a culture of corruption, starting from the lowest levels of government institutions, corruption becomes the heart of the administration and will continue to regenerate across future generations. Its ever-growing presence within the government makes it difficult for anti-corruption fighters to prevail, as other legal channels within relevant institutions are also compromised. Corrupt officials with established financial and political power can easily defeat anti-corruption warriors. In light of this, many countries should follow China's example, where every corrupt official deserves the death penalty. No obstacles such as Human Rights that have become a shield for corrupt officials.
In fact, in one country, this action has already become public knowledge. Many people openly engage in corruption, but society chooses to remain silent, realizing that their actions will not lead to a better outcome.
In fact, in one country, this action has already become public knowledge. Many people openly engage in corruption, but society chooses to remain silent, realizing that their actions will not lead to a better outcome.
Greed is a part of being human, we can control our own greed but cannot control the greed of others. Today, corruption has become a cultural feature of government work, and its elimination is impossible, and no politician wants to eliminate it. We are citizens, so it is very frustrating and annoying to see so many others corrupt. But I believe that if you or I become a politician, corruption will happen.
In developed countries, the level of corruption is much lower, what could be the reason for this? Indeed, in these countries there is no subject, that studies the harm of corruption. Most likely, the standard of living in these countries is much higher, respectively, the population is more conscious and people have different values.
Perhaps because most developed countries, having been in existence for far more longer than most developing nations and has had decades to go at it over and over till they finally got it right.
Now, you wouldn’t actually expect a developing nation that is obviously still developing to overnight have the characteristics and qualities of a developed nation. All that would take work and time which the developed nations has fortunately had a lot of.
The level of corruption would seem higher in developing countries than in developed countries. I do not doubt that. But like I stated, developed countries has had some good time to put in place working policies that would deter and punish wrongdoers irrespective of who the person is.
I think I really agree with the statement that corruption must be taught from an early age. Children are the future leaders of our society and it is important for them to understand the negative impact corruption has on individuals and the nation as a whole.
One effective way to teach children about corruption is through example. Educators can use real life examples of how corruption has caused the downfall of countries and the suffering of people. This approach can help children understand the seriousness of corruption and its long-term effects.
I would add In addition to using examples, it is important to emphasize the consequences of corruption. This could include discussing how corruption affects the economy, the environment and society as a whole. Yes, our children should be encouraged to think critically about this issue and realize that corruption is not just an abstract concept, but a real problem that affects everyone.
One effective way to teach children about corruption is through example. Educators can use real life examples of how corruption has caused the downfall of countries and the suffering of people. This approach can help children understand the seriousness of corruption and its long-term effects.
I would add In addition to using examples, it is important to emphasize the consequences of corruption. This could include discussing how corruption affects the economy, the environment and society as a whole. Yes, our children should be encouraged to think critically about this issue and realize that corruption is not just an abstract concept, but a real problem that affects everyone.
I think teaching the young ones about corruption wouldn’t have the effects in the long run like you think it would. We all know the difference between right and wrong and actually don’t need to be taught that stealing from the public funds is not a good thing to do. People will do whatever they want to do especially if there is no repercussions for their actions.
More people would be inclined to indulge in wrongdoings cause everybody would seem to be doing it. There will always be greedy and selfish people everywhere and you can’t change that with education about corruption
While teaching the young ones about the dangers of corruption wouldn’t totally eradicate it in our societies, it might just put a small dent.
In developed countries, the level of corruption is much lower, what could be the reason for this? Indeed, in these countries there is no subject, that studies the harm of corruption. Most likely, the standard of living in these countries is much higher, respectively, the population is more conscious and people have different values.More people would be inclined to indulge in wrongdoings cause everybody would seem to be doing it. There will always be greedy and selfish people everywhere and you can’t change that with education about corruption
While teaching the young ones about the dangers of corruption wouldn’t totally eradicate it in our societies, it might just put a small dent.
And if young people are taught that corruption is bad, but they will see a completely different picture that is actually happening in their government, then there will be very little benefit from such training, because there will be a discrepancy with reality.
Teach the kids by example like how countries are destroyed by corrupt leaders and how corrupts damages a country and individuals.
Now in our time where corruption is at its peak there is dire need to teach kids about what is corruption and what are its consequences.
Now in our time where corruption is at its peak there is dire need to teach kids about what is corruption and what are its consequences.
I totally agree with you but I think that we should put that lesson somewhere along the age of 12-18 years old because the concept of corruption is complex and young underdeveloped minds might not be able to handle the complexities, to be honest I think that we should focus more on morality, behavior, ethics and individuality, with a strong moral and ethical foundation, even if they don't know the complexities of corruption, their conscience will be a big stop gap.
Indeed socialization from an early age regarding corruption can have a positive impact on life in the future. It cannot be denied that corruption is a big problem. In my opinion, dissatisfaction with what is obtained from the work done is the initial factor for people to commit corruption. a thank you is not enough to repay hard work.
I think teaching the young ones about corruption wouldn’t have the effects in the long run like you think it would. We all know the difference between right and wrong and actually don’t need to be taught that stealing from the public funds is not a good thing to do. People will do whatever they want to do especially if there is no repercussions for their actions.
More people would be inclined to indulge in wrongdoings cause everybody would seem to be doing it. There will always be greedy and selfish people everywhere and you can’t change that with education about corruption
While teaching the young ones about the dangers of corruption wouldn’t totally eradicate it in our societies, it might just put a small dent.
More people would be inclined to indulge in wrongdoings cause everybody would seem to be doing it. There will always be greedy and selfish people everywhere and you can’t change that with education about corruption
While teaching the young ones about the dangers of corruption wouldn’t totally eradicate it in our societies, it might just put a small dent.
Most counseling would probably tell you this "children will follow whatever the parents show as an example not their words", and that is partially true. This may also be off topic but, you know people are honed not only by their home but also from their environment, life style, norms and traditions. In regards to corruption, a child can be taught that it has bad impact on your home, but the thing is, would they understand that? A child can slowly mature and learn the process of life through their experience and what we as parents can contribute is just to guide them not to lose their paths.
The title of the topic was very tempting to see the different ideas in this regard, especially since it is a specialty understood only by specialists (experts, lawyers...). But is it really possible to believe that this can be taught to children?
The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
These days the parents and teachers were much into educating the children than teaching them disciplines of life that makes him/her a good person in the society. Everything needs to start from the home, we need to teach them how to be good than how to become a physician/engineer/scientist, etc. When a kid is disciplined and know what to do and what shouldn't, automatically he/she will understand and learn the right thing to make a change and support the society.The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
The problem is whether it is permissible to teach children all possible dangers and how much this helps them in an early educational stage. Studying the risks of anything is supposed to be part of the course. It's really complicated and I don't think it's been seriously addressed even academically.
The title of the topic was very tempting to see the different ideas in this regard, especially since it is a specialty understood only by specialists (experts, lawyers...). But is it really possible to believe that this can be taught to children?
The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
These days the parents and teachers were much into educating the children than teaching them disciplines of life that makes him/her a good person in the society. Everything needs to start from the home, we need to teach them how to be good than how to become a physician/engineer/scientist, etc. When a kid is disciplined and know what to do and what shouldn't, automatically he/she will understand and learn the right thing to make a change and support the society. The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
What a timely topic for me. I was just browsing with some short videos and there's this interesting vid that I've watched that teaches about sin, lying and honesty.
I think what should be taught at a young age is to be honest. Corruption's root is from being dishonest so the other criminal minds do have these activities building up because of dishonesty.
And if we're going to imagine that all people in the government are honest, all companies are honest, everyone is honest. We'd be living in utopia.
I think what should be taught at a young age is to be honest. Corruption's root is from being dishonest so the other criminal minds do have these activities building up because of dishonesty.
And if we're going to imagine that all people in the government are honest, all companies are honest, everyone is honest. We'd be living in utopia.
The title of the topic was very tempting to see the different ideas in this regard, especially since it is a specialty understood only by specialists (experts, lawyers...). But is it really possible to believe that this can be taught to children?
The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
The rule is that children should be taught good deeds and then, in a slightly advanced year, they will ask themselves questions and try to find answers. In principle, everything cannot be taught, since each field has special legal rules that may not include other cases.
A fish can only be only be folded or bend while it is still fresh but once dried, there's no more remedy to ameliorate anything concerning it because it's already too late, if we want a generation that is free from corruption then it all begins with the present one we are in, that we must put all hands together in fighting against it and ensuring the young ones don't have anything to do with corrupt related offenses.
Pretty interesting on how you relate a fish with the corruption but why will you fold the fish anyway? It would die then but when you fold a dried fish, it can still be cooked and eaten right away. The same thing can go with the corruption. There is still a chance to clear it up by re-electing the right person on the government.It only starts with us (the public). We must not be greedy and don't just accept bribe money from the politician but we must vote wisely next time. We can teach the young ones about the good things and this corruption and then they should teach their children too when they get older. That is the only way to ensure a corrupt-free country.
Corruption can not be prevented because not all of us wanted to end it. Rather than searching for the truth, most of us get easily swayed by sugarcoated words by politicians, their broken promises, etc. To end corruption, we must come up with a unity, that has one goal, and that is to vote someone who is really trustworthy of our shared dreams and hope for every countries around the globe.
But it's all hopeless now, in my opinion, because people are blinded with money and power, and poor people doesn't have the voice to make a move because they are being oppressed by powerful individuals.
But it's all hopeless now, in my opinion, because people are blinded with money and power, and poor people doesn't have the voice to make a move because they are being oppressed by powerful individuals.
In addition to all of the aforementioned factors, I believe corruption in society can be combated at a young age.
I agree if corruption is taught at a young age, it can be nipped in the bud before it blooms. Parents, uncles and aunts serve as role models for kids to follow. They first teach them the appropriate way to behave in the society and how the society frowns on individuals who are of bad behaviours.High school kids can first be taught about upholding the moralistic values of the society and then damming impact of corruption in the society. But I believe that this education has to begin with the family. As a high school kid one of the subjects I took was civic education. It served as the foundation for anti-corruption studies, law.and society, accountability, and integrity. 
Moral education is the key to stopping corruption, currently many countries make departments or institutions to control corruption, but the cost for these institutions is very large and the result is that corruption is not reduced, but if the state has a long -term plan, it must be taught from an early age.
It will get you surprised that the department or institutions that you thinking can expose corruption and the people on the corruption table are the one doing corruption act and collaboration with government officials to hide stolen money of the people. Corruption is a very serious problem in some countries, it will take plenty of time to reduce because it will hardly go totally. I think serious laws against corruption should be in place for the people that are practicing it and stealing public money.
Jump to: