Pages:
Author

Topic: Could BTC ever become fast enough to function as a single world currency? - page 5. (Read 3699 times)

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
I doubt they could possibly do something with it  Cheesy

Outlawing it in their country would stop BTC cold.
Very few would go to jail over it.

 Cool
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
I doubt they could possibly do something with it  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance

An Alt will take BTC place as top coin within 4 years.  Wink
I told you just to upset you.


 Cool

FYI:
LN is offchain, you might as well just trust a bank.



legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1031
Why not ? Lightning network is always there whether SegWit gets implemented or not. LN should enable instant off-chain transfer of the ownership of bitcoin without the need of any third party , of course there should be enough LN nodes out there. I really doubt that bitcoin could become the primary international currency , not because It can't handle it but more because the banking system and governments won't allow that to happen.
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250


aren't LN and sidechains 3rd party though? and has their technology been tested?
No, Bitcoin is an open source technology there's no 3rd party. Yes, before implementantion all upgrades is and will be completely and comprehensively tested, it's not layman's Unlimited fudged cookery
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250

BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool


full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance

aren't LN and sidechains 3rd party though? and has their technology been tested?
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250

Btc should never become worldwide currency because ,one way or another,it will become more centralized
more cetralized than what? fiat or alts?
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for.
SegWit IS NOT the only improvement, LN and Sidechains (after segwit) give fiat and alts no chance
hero member
Activity: 3164
Merit: 937
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?

Nope,

It's ONCHAIN transactions can not handle that demand,
plus as it's price rises so does it transaction fees, only the rich will be able to afford adding a transaction per block.
Mass adoption will fail and the rich will dump BTC in favor of other crypto that the masses can use.
BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool



Enough coins?It`s not about the number or coins.It`s about the blockchain and how it works.
Maybe Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin with this in mind.
Btc should never become worldwide currency because ,one way or another,it will become more centralized and the fundamental concept of bitcoin will be destroyed.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?

Nope,

It's ONCHAIN transactions can not handle that demand,
plus as it's price rises so does it transaction fees, only the rich will be able to afford adding a transaction per block.
Mass adoption will fail and the rich will dump BTC in favor of other crypto that the masses can use.
BTC just does not have enough coins for worldwide adoption.

 Cool

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
There is a thought I've had. If BTC were to go past the moon and crush all fiat currency it would undergo far more transactions than it does now, more than SegWit could account for. Is there any way that BTC could become fast enough to function as a single or primary international currency through further updates yet to be determined without upping the block size to 1 TB per block someday?
Pages:
Jump to: