Pages:
Author

Topic: Couple was forcibly ask by IRS to sell their crypto to pay their liabilities (Read 898 times)

legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 1617
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
If it was me I’d just file for bankruptcy & deny all knowledge of bitcoin. I’d say that I got hacked or something & don’t have access to those coins any more. There’s no way I’d be selling all of my bitcoin to pay debts.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 31
 So after having read that summary i cant really understand how that couple thought the IRS would let them of the hook for their liabilities just because most of their money ( 7 million) was tied up in crypto currency. I mean fair enough if they were to make an argument that they needed a month or so to liquidate the money to discharge the liability but asking for 6 years seems to be a bit much u cant really claim bankruptcy or being unable to discharge your debts (whether taxes or banks loans or whatsoever) while having that much in assets whether that be in Cryptocurrencies, real estate, stocks etc. ( unless of course you hadn't declared your crypto holdings and purchases in the first place but that's another scenario all together, Incidentally another reason why NO-KYC exchanges are so highly valued)

As far as any tax authority is concerned ( assuming they know about your crypto holdings) what they demanded in this case seems pretty fair. Also wouldn't the IRS letting them off the Hook here only encourage ( setting a legal precedent) people to buy crypto currencies come tax season as a method of avoiding your tax liabilities.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
The IRS can go jump in a lake because taxation is theft. Shouldn't have to pay these thugs a dime no matter what the circumstances.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 17
While the couples move is understandable, the reaction from the IRS is too. Only death and taxes are certain so if you are a smart person you calculate that in your investment plan. As for attempt to confiscate or seize the money, it´s just as it is everywhere. If you own money to the state, they are eager to "motivate" you to pay asap. If the state owns you money, it could last 2-3 months until something happens
full member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 183
I don't see any problems here. A married couple has a million dollars in debt to the IRS, which they do not deny. At the same time, they have about seven million dollars in cryptocurrency. However, they do not want to withdraw some of their cryptocurrency assets, possibly due to the fact that they expect profit.
These difficulties are not the tax authorities. They rightly suggested to the couple to voluntarily pay off the debt at the expense of savings in cryptocurrency. They cannot withdraw the cryptocurrency and forcibly repay the debt at the expense of it, since they do not have access to the private keys of their wallets. If the tax debt is not paid, the tax service may well enforce the property of the married couple through the court. This couple, therefore, has a choice.
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 588
You own the pen
It depends on how much debt do I have. sometimes when I can no longer find some money to pay my debt, I go to my cousins they have some fortunes though which is the very best option I have. they always pay for me my debt and will pay them later when I find some money to pay them. the good thing about them is they don't give me an ultimatum to pay my debt, they give me free time to pay. Anyway, the question here is talking about huge amount of debt which is no doubt a big problem for the debtors. I won't regret paying it with my cryptocurrencies since things like this can happen nowadays we should ready for something like this to happen to us.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
It is an extremely interesting story. I still thought till now, that government organisations don't even know something about crypto and they are not looking if someone has some investment in it. That's why I like more P2P exchanges, cause there is much harder to track how much I bought money.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
What kind of lawyer do they have haha.

One who told them what they wanted to hear for the amount of money he wanted to hear.

Maybe he's retiring in a few weeks. That's the only possible explanation for the sheer outlandishness.

Aye, that usually be the case, especially with people who got money by being really lucky, rather than by being really hardworking --  a sweeping statement I know but when you hear stories like this, you really got to wonder how lucky these guys must have been to be able to be in a position to make such decisions.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 4
In summary:

- Alexander and Laura Strashny filed income tax return due in 2017, but unable to pay

- they sent IRS letters proposing to pay the liability in iinstallments over a period of 6 years

-  IRS received the proposal recorded it and put in in pending status

- As of December 2018, the outstanding liability + interest exceeded $1 million

- IRS sent petition notice "Intent to Seize Your Assets" and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing.

- Petitioners timely requested a CDPhearing, expressinginterest in an installment agreement (IA) and attaching a copyof their previously submitted Forms 433-A and 9465.  They did notcheck the boxindicating thattheycould not pay the balance, and they did notdispute theirunderlyingliability for 2017.

- SO review the case and saw that they have a huge cryptocurrency investment

- SO eceived from petitioners’ repre-sentative a copy of their 2018 tax return, which reported wages exceeding $200,000, and investment statements showing cryptocurrency assets valued over$7 million.  During the conference the SO noted that petitioners were currently
- 4-[*4] withdrawing$19,000 per month from their cryptocurrency account, and she asked why they could not liquidate or borrow against those assets in order to discharge their tax liabilityin full.

- Lawyers for the petitioners argue that they are unable to draw on their cryptocurrency account to pay their liability.

- On June 25, 2019, the IRS issued a notice of determination sustaining the proposed levy, rejecting petitioners’ request for an IA, and stating that “[l]evyaction is permitted 30 daysafter the rejection.

https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/USTCInOP/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=12258



There's no denying that the petitioners have money to pay to settled their tax liabilities. But they can't withdraw it in a timely manner, maybe they are waiting for the price to go up and make profit to at least lessen the damage. What are your thoughts on this?

Are you willing to sell your crypto to pay our debts or just go on settle it in months or years?
There are still countries that we cannot use crypto currency because they haven't yet legalize it so we cannot disobey their rules or else we are going to jail. If your country is not yet accepted crypto currency then wait for it to get legalize or migrate to another country where crypto currency is legal. Bitcoin is the crypto currency that has the biggest number of countries where it is legal since it is the first crypto currency that is launched way back 2009. I hope that other crypto currencies can also get legalize in different part of the world so that we can use crypto currency without worrying to get jailed.
Source: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/041515/countries-where-bitcoin-legal-illegal.asp
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1145
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI


There's no denying that the petitioners have money to pay to settled their tax liabilities. But they can't withdraw it in a timely manner, maybe they are waiting for the price to go up and make profit to at least lessen the damage. What are your thoughts on this?

Are you willing to sell your crypto to pay our debts or just go on settle it in months or years?

This is a hard decision to sell your Crypto just after the halving, I mean you could be losing a lot from potential profit coming from those coins you are hodling if they will grant you to settle it in months or years just a specific date in the future maybe two years  it will be preferable, you are not only going to pay all your obligations but you can make a profit from the Crypto you are holding now.
Right, It would be really disappointing when the crypto they sold goes high after months of selling it. There's no way you can tell if the crypto they are holding will grow after months so for me it's a great risk knowing that you need to pay your liabilities. But if they chose to risk the crypto assets they have now to make it grow and being successful on that plan can make it worth the risk, Earning some profits and paying the liabilities at the same time is a good plan but the execution is way complicated because there is pressure on you that you can't lose to the risk you entered.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
What kind of lawyer do they have haha.

One who told them what they wanted to hear for the amount of money he wanted to hear.

Maybe he's retiring in a few weeks. That's the only possible explanation for the sheer outlandishness.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3684
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
yes. and even if blockchain analysis isnt that good now, it will be.

i mentioned upthread i always pull 20% more on sells so its already in fiat for taxes. i dont touch that 20% fiat in the bank, only cash it in when the man wants his tax.

Good call. I don't have to worry about this now but I wonder if at some point I will have to, I'm never certain of my next tax jurisdiction but I think anyone who trades, and who isn't 100% certain or has not got the all clear from the tax man should always have a bit of padding in that bank account.

Strange case because they went to court standing on no legs. What kind of lawyer do they have haha.
full member
Activity: 2324
Merit: 175


There's no denying that the petitioners have money to pay to settled their tax liabilities. But they can't withdraw it in a timely manner, maybe they are waiting for the price to go up and make profit to at least lessen the damage. What are your thoughts on this?

Are you willing to sell your crypto to pay our debts or just go on settle it in months or years?

This is a hard decision to sell your Crypto just after the halving, I mean you could be losing a lot from potential profit coming from those coins you are hodling if they will grant you to settle it in months or years just a specific date in the future maybe two years  it will be preferable, you are not only going to pay all your obligations but you can make a profit from the Crypto you are holding now.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Your argument will not stand up in court if you take this to court... It is the same as saying... "Listen IRS, I will pay my debt when the stock price of my Microsoft shares reach X amount." The taxman takes whatever they get, when they want to...they do not wait for you to say when you are ready.

Will I sell my Crypto currencies to pay them?.... Yes I will, because I cannot do anything with that Crypto when my ass is in jail. Pay the taxes and be done with it and then enjoy what is left after the taxes was deducted.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1192
I would have payed the tax and settle the dues and closed the case considering I am liable for the above said amount . But surely why would they not be paying it when they have money and why would they want to make it the big news and now many things would be find out by IRS and also they be under suspicion as haveing money and not paying it this no government would ever want it . Unless some one has lost the money or something and does not have really to pay that becomes different story .

Most of us would.
I don't llike taxes and I oppose them as much as I can, but if I had a reported surplus of a few million dollars, I'd pay. There's no other way. It's like they already got a speeding ticket, signed it and a year later decided they don't want to pay it. Pretty dumb if you ask me.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
They are milking people against gains that actually NEVER materialized.

But they did materialise. The trader made profit and that profit was available to realise. It's not the tax man's problem if he immediately threw it back in somewhere else. It's his responsibility to secure their share.

It's not crypto 'persecution', the same thing applies everywhere else too. If he were moving between currencies forex trading it may never be dollars but there still might be profits that are taxable in dollars.
I understand what you are saying. A lot of people just juggled alt-coins on these websites hearing about the insane stories of latest "collaborations" and "Proof of X" which would revolutionize crypto. A lot of people saw those 10X gains. Many were financially too naive to realize these things. If i consider myself in that situation, I would never consider the stupid bunch of 100 NXT, 200 OMG, 500 GNT and such obscure tokens sitting on my bittrex account as worth anything today. At that time they were worth a few 1000 USD. Its scary to think that these can be taxed retrospectively on being considered as returns (which eventually evaporated, of course). I no longer use that Bittrex account but it has some fractional worth of Alt-coins from the early days. They have blocked the account asking for KYC. The stupid "three shots, one front, left, right, holding a placard, lol its insane). Its also a sign that the exchanges have become institutions in themselves with full compliance. This escalated quickly.

The safest way is to follow what vapourminer said about keeping away some 20% realized profits for taxes. Sounds sensible enough. Anybody indulging in trading, even if they are financially unware students should do this.
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 619
In summary:

- Alexander and Laura Strashny filed income tax return due in 2017, but unable to pay

- they sent IRS letters proposing to pay the liability in iinstallments over a period of 6 years

-  IRS received the proposal recorded it and put in in pending status

- As of December 2018, the outstanding liability + interest exceeded $1 million

- IRS sent petition notice "Intent to Seize Your Assets" and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing.

- Petitioners timely requested a CDPhearing, expressinginterest in an installment agreement (IA) and attaching a copyof their previously submitted Forms 433-A and 9465.  They did notcheck the boxindicating thattheycould not pay the balance, and they did notdispute theirunderlyingliability for 2017.

- SO review the case and saw that they have a huge cryptocurrency investment

- SO eceived from petitioners’ repre-sentative a copy of their 2018 tax return, which reported wages exceeding $200,000, and investment statements showing cryptocurrency assets valued over$7 million.  During the conference the SO noted that petitioners were currently
- 4-[*4] withdrawing$19,000 per month from their cryptocurrency account, and she asked why they could not liquidate or borrow against those assets in order to discharge their tax liabilityin full.

- Lawyers for the petitioners argue that they are unable to draw on their cryptocurrency account to pay their liability.

- On June 25, 2019, the IRS issued a notice of determination sustaining the proposed levy, rejecting petitioners’ request for an IA, and stating that “[l]evyaction is permitted 30 daysafter the rejection.

https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/USTCInOP/OpinionViewer.aspx?ID=12258



There's no denying that the petitioners have money to pay to settled their tax liabilities. But they can't withdraw it in a timely manner, maybe they are waiting for the price to go up and make profit to at least lessen the damage. What are your thoughts on this?

Are you willing to sell your crypto to pay our debts or just go on settle it in months or years?
Interestingly USA has been pretty developed with cryptocurrency too now. They have defined cryptocurrency as financial asset therefore it's their right to seize them for recovery of their taxes. Moreover even if it wasn't a financial asset they can seize any asset they want.
There's no denying that the petitioners have money to pay to settled their tax liabilities. But they can't withdraw it in a timely manner, maybe they are waiting for the price to go up and make profit to at least lessen the damage. What are your thoughts on this?

Are you willing to sell your crypto to pay our debts or just go on settle it in months or years?

It seems pretty clear to me that this has little to do with cryptocurrency. They simply are doing whatever they can to avoid paying $1 million dollars to the government. Wouldn't you? They won't win, but at least they tried.
True indeed it makes no sense to speculate on price going up to pay you taxes in future. You know there are huge interests penalty and prosecutions involved. They might be thinking of declaring some bankruptcy or something in real world then after getting the immunity would withdraw their crypto holdings to get a new life. You just can't say this for every debt you have to calculate the additional costs involved in deferment of debt when you decide to do so.
full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 204
From what I read it's pretty clear to me that those people simply don't want to pay their taxes.
The IRS tells them "hey,you have cryptocurrencies worth millions of dollars,sell your crypto and pay your taxes without intallments!",but those people are just "nah,we can't sell our crypto,we wanna pay in a 6-year time frame".This is just plain stupid to me.I assume that the IRS will try to confiscate a large portion of their crytpocurrency investments.
Trying to hide your wealth from taxes by investing in cryptocurrencies isn't that easy.

Plain and straight, if they do really concerned about paying their taxes no one can stop them selling their assets/crypto
but this couple are really trying to convinced IRS
to have 6-year time frame hoping that the value of their crypto is really high, from that it will favor them in paying the
debt as it can possibly the earnings from the assets that they've got.



IRS though can easily track their resources and since that it was their debt the couple needs to comply and use their
crypto assets and pay the said amount.
full member
Activity: 812
Merit: 142
I would have payed the tax and settle the dues and closed the case considering I am liable for the above said amount . But surely why would they not be paying it when they have money and why would they want to make it the big news and now many things would be find out by IRS and also they be under suspicion as haveing money and not paying it this no government would ever want it . Unless some one has lost the money or something and does not have really to pay that becomes different story .
sr. member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 315
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
From what I read it's pretty clear to me that those people simply don't want to pay their taxes.
The IRS tells them "hey,you have cryptocurrencies worth millions of dollars,sell your crypto and pay your taxes without intallments!",but those people are just "nah,we can't sell our crypto,we wanna pay in a 6-year time frame".This is just plain stupid to me.I assume that the IRS will try to confiscate a large portion of their crytpocurrency investments.
Trying to hide your wealth from taxes by investing in cryptocurrencies isn't that easy.
The problem that they are facing could have been avoidable if they paid their taxes properly in the first place, the problem with IRS and other agencies that are handling taxes is that they can drain someone of their entire funds just by dragging the process for too long, that is how bureaucracy works, the paperworks are going to kill you when in the end you could have paid it. Authority is very hard on people  avoiding taxes. Now they have to spend their crypto investments to pay for their mistakes which is kind of a bummer.
Pages:
Jump to: