Topic: Craig wright found to have plagiarized his PhD-not really a doctor of anything (Read 1787 times)

After all he as been through and his credibility being at nil in the cryptospace, you would think he will just slip into depths of obscurity.
But no
He wants to continue being in the spotlight and garner the attention of hailing all other coins but his own to be a farce of the true and one real BTC...
BSV.
The one to rule them all!


https://cryptonews.com/news/defi-dexs-stablecoins-chainlink-all-scam-says-craig-wright-7572.htm

Nothing more to say about it.
*drops mic*

Valuetainment had reached out to interview Dr. Feelgood of Bitcoin: Craig S Wright!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JvDauIX5lg

They had to do it after their recent interview with Max Keiser last month with him straight out saying infront of the camera that Craig Wright is definitely not Satoshi... he isnt smart enough to be him.
With 5290 views released 3 hours ago, this is getting more views due to the twitter hack on most of the major bitcoin OG accounts out there.

Really?, what do we expected from a serial liar like Craig wright whose incompetency is second to none. For anyone to stick to a claim what doesn't belong to them will go as far as this to plagiarised anything given to them in their careers. Is unfortunate to this serial liar that he never truly wrote his PhD thesis by himself like others but looking for Satoshi Nakamoto handwork to claim to himself. Shame on half backed PhD Craig wright who plagiarized his doctorate degree. Let him be investigated and brought to book.

Every time I see Craig Wright in his controversial interviews. He seems a little talkative to me, the expression on his face is a little unbalanced. Sometimes I think he does it to get attention with his lies, or some marketing strategy for his coin BSV, he is a clown on Twitter and social media dedicated to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.

Even though you, ene1980, seem to be correctly criticizing the never BSV position of qiwoman2 based on some other altcoin affinities, your attempt to give some legitimacy to BSV based on supposed technical grounds cannot be taken seriously, can they?

Is it really possible to take either Bcash or BcashSV seriously because they are both based upon scams.  Can a coin come into existence through a scam and then become legitimate based on some supposed technicalities that might exist?  Personally, I am having trouble with giving any benefit of the doubt to either of those bcash variants, and neither of them have even removed themselves from their scam components with the passage of time, either.

In other words, there seems to be a decently high burden of proof (with evidence) and burden of presentation (with logic) to show either or both of the bcash variants (BCH or BSV) as having any kind of laudable technical features... and probably one of the first hurdles for either of them to overcome would be their ongoing seemingly centralized control cult figures..... anyhow, there would likely be a lot more that would need to be shown after getting rid of what appears to be centralized control cult figures that are engaging in smoke and mirrors before we even get close to considering if there might be some technical contributions, even if they are not planning to compete directly with bitcoin (or otherwise serve as BTC attack vectors).....

By the way, qiwoman2, there is no need to put the word "original" in front of bitcoin.. because there is only one bitcoin, even if others are trying to use the bitcoin name.  It should be a good thing to remove yourself from such nonsense habit in terms of referring to any coin, besides bitcoin with the word bitcoin, then you would not feel some need to put a qualifier in front of king daddy's name.    

Looks like you like the altcoin market and i am assuming that because you are advertising some random project and you are talking about principle even if it gives you the profit but you can jump on random projects and earn the profit  . I am not a fan of CSW and his bullshit but if BSV can scale like they are claiming then i would not mind using them in the future and that does not mean i will not use bitcoin. If they can coexist so be it and it is better than majority of the shit coins in the market.

I read an article today about the Mt. Gox hacked coins in possession of CSW and his never ending misery continues.

First: Get the fuck out of here with any kind of "maybe brilliant mind" descriptions of craig or any of the fucktwats associated with BSV.  Even if true, it does not matter to give a scammer any kind of benefit of the doubt or any kind of praise.  In the olden days, he would likely have been thrown into the looney bin or into debtors prison, so the fact that he has a funder and the internet to spread bullshit to innocent people in scamming them and deceiving them should not allow crazy irresponsible scammers like that to roam freely with any kind of benefit of the doubt that he might be a genius deep down inside..... who fucking cares?  It's irrelevant.. he can go be a supposed genius on his own dime and behind some cell.. maybe a dungeon would be better so that he cannot hurt anyone besides himself.

Second:  Sure, there may be some distraction factor regarding the real Satoshi.. so i suppose that is kind of a valid point, but the scamster craig is such a high level fraud (and so full of shit) that it is difficult to believe that he has been able to garner so much attention and that anyone should spend much if any resources on his louder and louder nonsense and using various systems (such as courts and information distribution) to get attention... So, in the end, whether it is distracting from the real satoshi or drawing attention is something that could be argued either way with probably more leanings on the side of distracting, since that goofball, craig, has tended to get so much attention for so many years (what is it?  a bit over 5 years of his baloney, now?)

Third:  I suppose with the lies, there might be some rationale and even natural progression that the lies just have to get BIGGER and BIGGER in order to attempt to cover up other lies.. so sure a snowball building of lies (others would describe as a house of cards... or juggling) that would likely cause even the best of scammers to have difficulties keeping it all going in any kind of seemingly coherent way.. and surely it is largely only coherent to really dumb people who want to believe such nonsense or they are so invested that they cannot figure any way out... so yeah, no matter what goof ball craig, calvin or his other over-invested buddies come up with as their next ploy, there are a certain number of folks going to believe no matter how preposterous.

It´s a pity, that guy was or maybe still is somewhere a brilliant mind, just his psyche is somehow messed up. Dave Kleiman would rotate in his grave hearing all that crap Craig comes up with. The recent confession of the Mt Gox hack doesn´t make it better. I wonder was his final goal is, the admiration and glory of being the Bitcoin inventor or just making money. However it is, having Craig in the spotlight make the life of the real Satoshi easier.

He's unable to continue one thought but jumps from one to another and mumbles things to himself abusing "or so", "sort of" and other similar phrases. In short, he talks a lot but there's not many facts or details in what he's saying. I recall a judge in one of his court cases described him as avoiding and unable to address any questions.
Also, IMO, theology isn't really a study you should be proud of or brag like that PhD has a meaning. You could as well be a voodoo doctor.

After watching this video broadcasted June 3 2020, he comes off as a very confused person and some would say he's delusional garnering some borderline mental illness.
This interview doesnt help his case one bit as at one point he is saying digital signatures don't mean anything.

Reimagine 2020: Craig S. Wright - World Riots, Hard Work, Quantum Computing and more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHBrodzl5qY
Caution: If you dont want to melt your brain then dont watch it in one sitting.

I was never a fan of Craig Wright to be quite honest with you. I didn't like the way he blackmailed the whole Bitcoin community into mining his coin otherwise he would dump all his BTC. He did dump a lot at the time and caused a mini market crash, so fro that reason I will NEVER SUPPORT BITCOIN SV and even if it makes some money on a pump, out of principle I will just never buy or invest in it. There are so many other praiseworthy projects out there and I like the original BITCOIN as well, so will stick to that as a source of long term asset.

The gift which just keeps on giving.

This should be it, but isn't this a saga?

People yelling out their windows at the world..
"I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!"

Imagine dragons and unicorns.
Dedicated to the bad liar.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8tQL-UaY_Q

Spitting those facts


From the thread discussing about who signed those addresses from the tulip trust CSW said were his.

Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud - Tulip Trust addresses signed message
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/craig-steven-wright-is-a-liar-and-a-fraud-tulip-trust-addresses-signed-message-5250960

True, I m desparate cause many ppl are too lazy to read the sources in the court docs, to understand them and to judge without bags & bias

But relax, its gonna be sorted out without all that biased shills and name callings anyway  - stay on facts

Loving the desperation on your part to avoid admitting that the public figurehead and guiding hand for your chosen coin is a proven once again to be a lying shitweasel.

These addresses are extrapolated, not final

Finding things in docs is doing PoW

I cannot find the statement with the link you posted, looks like they removed the statement knowing that it will backfire again  .

I am yet to see a statement regarding the plagiarized PhD papers, if you have any links do post a valid link regarding that.

If CSW provided these addresses as his to the court then he will be REKT.