this could definitely lure out the real satoshi if he isnt him
I dont think he is and hopefully this makes the real satoshi
come out and go cmon now its not this clown..
Topic: Craig Wright IS ACTUALLY Satoshi Nakamoto. It's REAL. - page 2. (Read 3380 times)
I guess people want to know who Satoshi Nakamoto is because everyone wants to know what he/she will do with that 1 million Bitcoins. Satoshi can pretty much crash the whole market if he/she decides to cash out and be done with Bitcoin. In reality Satoshi Nakamoto can act as a God and I think for now Satoshi is keeping a low profile but what will happen if he/she gets fed up with all the bullshit going on within the Bitcoin community?
Surely this fool can at least spend 1 of Satoshi's coins!
He's a total shyster!!!
He's a total shyster!!!
I don't understand why you all are behind the satoshi myth?? Why u all want to know his actual identity??
Bitcoin has created history and it is always better to just take the profit out of it. Let the creator sleep in peace. Because of your curiosity, probably the creator of bitcoin is living a miserable life out in somewhere in the world.
This is not done, take benefit of the creation but lets not make his life tougher because of our curiosity.
Bitcoin has created history and it is always better to just take the profit out of it. Let the creator sleep in peace. Because of your curiosity, probably the creator of bitcoin is living a miserable life out in somewhere in the world.
This is not done, take benefit of the creation but lets not make his life tougher because of our curiosity.
Zero factual evidence provided as always. Cut the bullshit. 
The first step is something in the lines of:
The first step is something in the lines of:Amen, brother!
legacy only can tell 
about him
about him
If I am Satoshi, I will start moving my coins and cash them out!... since there is already any other someone admitting he is Satoshi- a scapegoat for others to target.
If he is not Satoshi, then we need to understand how he fooled Gavin (and Jon).
If he is Satoshi, then we need to understand why he produced a blog post that was misleading and worthless when it came to convincing anyone except Gavin and Jon.
Personally, I have a much easier time believing that either he fooled Gavin and Jon, or they are, for unknown reasons, in cahoots with him.
1. The first claims that Wright was Satoshi in December turned out to be worthless and scammy.
2. His public blog post was misleading and falsely presented to be evidence that he was Satoshi, but was nothing of the sort.
3. It is clear from Andreas' story that leading bitcoin developers were recruited to make an "appeal to authority" type of public unveiling of Satoshi, rather than a simple presentation of cryptographic proof.
4. Wright is already in trouble for tax charges and has been busy explaining away other discrepancies in his story such as his academic credentials.
5. Other background information also does not fit: His personality conflicts, and the timing of Satoshi emails seems to strongly indicate he slept from midnight-6 AM, Eastern Standard Time (US). Not that he had to live in that time zone, but the further away one gets the more unusual a sleep pattern would be indicated. And Australia is about as far away as you can get.
The pattern already established for Wright is one of false and misleading claims, going back to December as well as his blog post today and his avoidance of simple public proofs. The claims in favor of Wright being Satoshi based on behavior and bitcoin familiarity are dramatically weaker. One would expect any half-prepared scammer to be able to accomplish that much.
If he is Satoshi, then we need to understand why he produced a blog post that was misleading and worthless when it came to convincing anyone except Gavin and Jon.
Personally, I have a much easier time believing that either he fooled Gavin and Jon, or they are, for unknown reasons, in cahoots with him.
1. The first claims that Wright was Satoshi in December turned out to be worthless and scammy.
2. His public blog post was misleading and falsely presented to be evidence that he was Satoshi, but was nothing of the sort.
3. It is clear from Andreas' story that leading bitcoin developers were recruited to make an "appeal to authority" type of public unveiling of Satoshi, rather than a simple presentation of cryptographic proof.
4. Wright is already in trouble for tax charges and has been busy explaining away other discrepancies in his story such as his academic credentials.
5. Other background information also does not fit: His personality conflicts, and the timing of Satoshi emails seems to strongly indicate he slept from midnight-6 AM, Eastern Standard Time (US). Not that he had to live in that time zone, but the further away one gets the more unusual a sleep pattern would be indicated. And Australia is about as far away as you can get.
The pattern already established for Wright is one of false and misleading claims, going back to December as well as his blog post today and his avoidance of simple public proofs. The claims in favor of Wright being Satoshi based on behavior and bitcoin familiarity are dramatically weaker. One would expect any half-prepared scammer to be able to accomplish that much.
Very well put, thank you.
I don't see reason for this guy to play hide + seek if he actually wants to prove he is the creator.
Maybe Craig is helping us to lure out the real Satoshi!
I believe the real Satoshi has left bitcoin and does not want to be related to bitcoin anymore. He will not come out to admit or deny anything...
I believe the real Satoshi has left bitcoin and does not want to be related to bitcoin anymore. He will not come out to admit or deny anything...
i don't know why we are even discussing this matter, it is just like other hundred topics and other people claiming to be satoshi. provide a signed message like a normal human being and then we will consider the fact that he can be satoshi.
Still waiting for signed proof....
^This. Everything else is just speculation. It is very easy to make empty claims but the truth of the matter is for someone as genius as Satoshi is, he wouldn't need proof from a third party to confirm that he is who he say he is. I have much belief CW is just an impersonator.
I'm not sure this is Craig Wirght is Satoshi Nakamoto
We need more information about that. Dont take it so serious if it is not too clear.
We need more information about that. Dont take it so serious if it is not too clear.
Why the revelation a few months away from halving? Could he not have kept it to himself that he is indeed Satoshi a little while longer? Can he really be trusted with his statement?
If he is not Satoshi, then we need to understand how he fooled Gavin (and Jon).
If he is Satoshi, then we need to understand why he produced a blog post that was misleading and worthless when it came to convincing anyone except Gavin and Jon.
Personally, I have a much easier time believing that either he fooled Gavin and Jon, or they are, for unknown reasons, in cahoots with him.
1. The first claims that Wright was Satoshi in December turned out to be worthless and scammy.
2. His public blog post was misleading and falsely presented to be evidence that he was Satoshi, but was nothing of the sort.
3. It is clear from Andreas' story that leading bitcoin developers were recruited to make an "appeal to authority" type of public unveiling of Satoshi, rather than a simple presentation of cryptographic proof.
4. Wright is already in trouble for tax charges and has been busy explaining away other discrepancies in his story such as his academic credentials.
5. Other background information also does not fit: His personality conflicts, and the timing of Satoshi emails seems to strongly indicate he slept from midnight-6 AM, Eastern Standard Time (US). Not that he had to live in that time zone, but the further away one gets the more unusual a sleep pattern would be indicated. And Australia is about as far away as you can get.
The pattern already established for Wright is one of false and misleading claims, going back to December as well as his blog post today and his avoidance of simple public proofs. The claims in favor of Wright being Satoshi based on behavior and bitcoin familiarity are dramatically weaker. One would expect any half-prepared scammer to be able to accomplish that much.
If he is Satoshi, then we need to understand why he produced a blog post that was misleading and worthless when it came to convincing anyone except Gavin and Jon.
Personally, I have a much easier time believing that either he fooled Gavin and Jon, or they are, for unknown reasons, in cahoots with him.
1. The first claims that Wright was Satoshi in December turned out to be worthless and scammy.
2. His public blog post was misleading and falsely presented to be evidence that he was Satoshi, but was nothing of the sort.
3. It is clear from Andreas' story that leading bitcoin developers were recruited to make an "appeal to authority" type of public unveiling of Satoshi, rather than a simple presentation of cryptographic proof.
4. Wright is already in trouble for tax charges and has been busy explaining away other discrepancies in his story such as his academic credentials.
5. Other background information also does not fit: His personality conflicts, and the timing of Satoshi emails seems to strongly indicate he slept from midnight-6 AM, Eastern Standard Time (US). Not that he had to live in that time zone, but the further away one gets the more unusual a sleep pattern would be indicated. And Australia is about as far away as you can get.
The pattern already established for Wright is one of false and misleading claims, going back to December as well as his blog post today and his avoidance of simple public proofs. The claims in favor of Wright being Satoshi based on behavior and bitcoin familiarity are dramatically weaker. One would expect any half-prepared scammer to be able to accomplish that much.
The bit that convinced me was this interview that Gavin gave the BBC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA
At 0.43 he says Wright fitted in with the Satoshi he knew: "sometimes prickly and difficult to deal with".
Gavin had the most correspondence with Satoshi, and I bet they argued over details as they were working out the bugs in the project.
The bitcoin space at large has mythologised Satoshi as a sort of selfless saint who never spoke an unkind word and who was perfect in every way. A sort of Jesus for the crypto world. But no real person is like that, ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA
At 0.43 he says Wright fitted in with the Satoshi he knew: "sometimes prickly and difficult to deal with".
Gavin had the most correspondence with Satoshi, and I bet they argued over details as they were working out the bugs in the project.
The bitcoin space at large has mythologised Satoshi as a sort of selfless saint who never spoke an unkind word and who was perfect in every way. A sort of Jesus for the crypto world. But no real person is like that, ever.
This is not real not even close, craig wright just want to take credits for something he didn't do!
Yes its finally done, no more topics about who he was and how people are thinking about it.
I'm really happen with the fact that finally he stepped up and told he was the one that created the bitcoin(with others of course).
I'm really happen with the fact that finally he stepped up and told he was the one that created the bitcoin(with others of course).
Do you happen to the fact that finally we can be known to the truth and he told the one bitcoin to step up and be created (ofwith others course).
Still waiting for signed proof....
Another day another person to be claiming to be Nakamoto.
Jump to: