Zero factual evidence provided as always. Cut the bullshit. 
The first step is something in the lines of:
The first step is something in the lines of:THIS.
YOU
WILL
NOT
PUSH
YOUR
REVERSALBE TRANSACTION AGENDA ONTO US GAVIN.
Topic: Craig Wright IS ACTUALLY Satoshi Nakamoto. It's REAL. - page 3. (Read 3380 times)
THIS.
YOU
WILL
NOT
PUSH
YOUR
REVERSALBE TRANSACTION AGENDA ONTO US GAVIN.
Yes its finally done, no more topics about who he was and how people are thinking about it.
I'm really happen with the fact that finally he stepped up and told he was the one that created the bitcoin(with others of course).
I'm really happen with the fact that finally he stepped up and told he was the one that created the bitcoin(with others of course).
If he is then he's sure lost alot of class somewhere along the way. And where's the mentions of the dead guy? I thought he was the brains behind it all.
No one knows what is really the truth and I honestly think we never gonna know this to be honest.
There is a chance he is SN but there is still a chance that this guy is maybe talking bullshit because we do not have real proof.
There is a chance he is SN but there is still a chance that this guy is maybe talking bullshit because we do not have real proof.
Zero factual evidence provided as always. Cut the bullshit. The first step is something in the lines of:
The first step is something in the lines of:
A lot of people dont trust this.
Ive read so many claims "liar" "asshole" "insane" etc. today. But you're all wrong. HE is SATOSHI.
If you don't like him, it doesn't matter. Bitcoin lives on because it's the making of a genius. It lives on in a decentralized manner.
Craig Wright could well be Satoshi - OK, is Satoshi. Not that my opinion or conjecture matters one way or the other, but there it is nonetheless. I think the Sartre reference was the start of it for me, turning down the Nobel Prize for lit. He said art isn't a competition. Most people would give their left arm to even be nominated - but he turned it down.
Anyhow, the degree in Theology, the autodidactic (and academic) eclecticism, the London/England connection, the massive amounts of BTC shifted early on, the diffidence around going public with proof to anyone beyond Gavin Andresen, Gavins belief in his authenticity. And even the way he came across in the BBC interview - which he rather strongly avowed would be his first and last.
If you don't like him, it doesn't matter. Bitcoin lives on because it's the making of a genius. It lives on in a decentralized manner.
The real Satoshi could just send a message saying he is not Craig.
This actually might happen the more I think about it. If Craig is not the real Satoshi, then the real Satoshi might want to dispel these rumors before it goes too far.
This actually might happen the more I think about it. If Craig is not the real Satoshi, then the real Satoshi might want to dispel these rumors before it goes too far.
Craig Wright could well be Satoshi - OK, is Satoshi. Not that my opinion or conjecture matters one way or the other, but there it is nonetheless. I think the Sartre reference was the start of it for me, turning down the Nobel Prize for lit. He said art isn't a competition. Most people would give their left arm to even be nominated - but he turned it down.
Anyhow, the degree in Theology, the autodidactic (and academic) eclecticism, the London/England connection, the massive amounts of BTC shifted early on, the diffidence around going public with proof to anyone beyond Gavin Andresen, Gavins belief in his authenticity. And even the way he came across in the BBC interview - which he rather strongly avowed would be his first and last.
Jump to: