yes, first. in 2016, he claimed as satoshi, even he gave evidence of his first transaction to Hal Finney in 2009. some people believed he was satoshi, like Gavin Andresen and Jon Matinis.
but, in 2018, his admission get a negative response from the BTC community and from the enthusiastic about BTC because Craig's proof was not public. I think Craig's confession as satoshi is only a short drama. finally, he apologized to the public because he could not provide evidence for the first key owned by Satoshi only.
Nickup, A person in the BTC ycombinator community commented that the paper released by Satoshi was very simple, clear and complex. and he said that Craig could not create the role of the real Satoshi. He also said that Craig had a problem, he was being pursued by the Australian tax authorities, because he became one of the biggest tax claimants in Australia. Nickup also says that he has a friend who works in a Craig, they say that Craig is a cheater.
Law of submissions made by Craig will not make him win, there is plenty of evidence that he is fake satoshi, Wikileaks provides evidence that he has documents about his claims as satoshi, in Twitter, Wikileaks provides fake documents made by Craig.
many figures gave negative responses to Craig such as NIK Cubrilovic, Peter Rizun, Charlie Lie, Paul SZtorc, and others, even his mother considered Craig a liar.
so, I think, Craig's Fraud to the public is a big offense, and the court must give punishment to him, not to the person who defames him.yes, first. in 2016, he claimed as satoshi, even he gave evidence of his first transaction to Hal Finney in 2009. some people believed he was satoshi, like Gavin Andresen and Jon Matinis.
but, in 2018, his admission get a negative response from the BTC community and from the enthusiastic about BTC because Craig's proof was not public. I think Craig's confession as satoshi is only a short drama. finally, he apologized to the public because he could not provide evidence for the first key owned by Satoshi only.
Nickup, A person in the BTC ycombinator community commented that the paper released by Satoshi was very simple, clear and complex. and he said that Craig could not create the role of the real Satoshi. He also said that Craig had a problem, he was being pursued by the Australian tax authorities, because he became one of the biggest tax claimants in Australia. Nickup also says that he has a friend who works in a Craig, they say that Craig is a cheater.
Law of submissions made by Craig will not make him win, there is plenty of evidence that he is fake satoshi, Wikileaks provides evidence that he has documents about his claims as satoshi, in Twitter, Wikileaks provides fake documents made by Craig.
many figures gave negative responses to Craig such as NIK Cubrilovic, Peter Rizun, Charlie Lie, Paul SZtorc, and others, even his mother considered Craig a liar.
so, I think, Craig's Fraud to the public is a big offense, and the court must give punishment to him, not to the person who defiling a name of Craig.
.
