Topic: Craig Wright Threatens Lawsuit Against Bitcoiner - page 2. (Read 716 times)

Exactly, the community has really shown solidity this time to really expose Faketoshi and everything backfired on him. CZ thanks a hard stance, twitter is also erupting with support to Hodlonaut.

Every Bitcoiners now become Hodlonaut:

https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1116733748794540033

If you look at the market place and the N number of coins in the market you cannot tell that it is a crap project, the vision they are preaching are good to hear and if they are able to implement those things, then we will consider their valuation be worth, but the delisting part is just a twitter drama and nothing else, if binance starts delisting coins because of personal reason then they cannot be taken serious as a business  .

almost 15k now

https://weareallhodlonaut.com/

i am so happy about the community today because it seems like that everyone have eventually woken up and are seeing Craig for the fraud that he really is.
it was nearly last year where people were still confused about whether he is really Satoshi or not but it seems like they are eventually catching up. hopefully we can put an end to his scams soon and stop paying any attention to him so that he leaves this community with his shitcoin worth 0 soon.

Yes, exactly. That's a great reason. As was pointed out earlier Binance is a business. They can choose to do as they please. You don't have to like it, just use a different exchange. I highly doubt their business is going to suffer if the delist BSV, and I sincerely hope that happens.

BSV doesn't have enough technical merit to stand on its own, hence the constant attention-seeking behavior by Craig. It was ranked #10 after the fork, it is ranked #16 now, by the end of the year it will be out of the top 20. If Binance can speed up the process, that's awesome.

https://twitter.com/KennETHbosak/status/1116642717226942464?s=20

i really really can't stand this Craig Wright.
I will be really disappointed if, in the end, he can prove to be the real Satoshi. In my mind Satoshi is not someone who is so bully and wants so much attention.

the holdnaut donation page has raise 9k until now. Everyone must support him against this hoaxer fraud

https://weareallhodlonaut.com/

and a full list of all of Craig Wrights scams

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/bc7j9m/craig_wright_is_a_fraud_hoaxer_a_reminder_for/

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/b318ih/in_honor_of_craig_wrights_ragequit_from_twitter_i/eiwho2w/

How about you stop spamming the forum with posts that make absolutely no sense just to be paid more in your signature campaign ?
Your post history is shit, you should be careful or you'll get tagged soon.

I will really like to see if this will followed through to a reasonable end and not just as a world of mouth. Even though am not a fan of Craig and many things has been said about him in this space which are not cool. Maybe now he is trying to pick them and react to them or he might want to prove something out of it. To me if someone calls me what am not , I simply move on because that’s just the opinion of the person and I keep doing my good.

Craig wright is taking the whole thing too far any way we wish him goodluck in doing that because he has always come out to criticized the whole system and no one threatened a law suit now that he is refer to as a fraud he is filling charges. This case may be difficult in the US considering is popularity and involvements in the past.

yes this became his own boomerang for him, trying to trick people into claiming he was satoshi nakamoto. but people don't believe in him and of course he will get harsh criticism. and bringing this matter to court to fear those who criticize it is ridiculous and he will not win in this case. it seems like he wants to find sensation and attention.

I was wrong about the merit comment and can admit when I'm wrong - so you win that one.

I think there's murkiness with this topic, but I also don't think it's possible for the decentralized purity that some people want for a number of reasons. For example, Binance is known to freeze coins stolen by hackers - a lot of people are not opposed to that. In many ways the space is still centralized. Heck, this forum is centralized with arbitrary rules and moderators, and for me that's OK. On the other hand, I understand that Larimer and Ver have had bad experiences with governments overextending themselves, so I understand why they take their somewhat extreme philosophical approach. I just don't see one path here that is objectively right.

I think we will eventually have decentralized exchanges that will prevent what Binance is threatening to do - as well as delist and freeze stolen assets. The question is - will these exchanges be absolutely good? We have laws and need regulations because there are abuses in the system. Where the middle ground is people will still disagree - but usually a compromise is found. But again, totally decentralized exchanges and virtual realities will come to fruition eventually. I don't think Binance has ever pretended to be decentralized.

The reality is, fraud and theft are rampant in this industry. This is partly due to the Wild West nature of it with regulations that are archaic and lacking. So I see this problem as a puzzle where pieces have to be put into place, and we're going to always disagree on the setup. But anyway, there will always be jurisdictions out there more suited to individual biases.

To sum it up, yeah, I think CW is an asshole, and I don't care if his coin gets shitcanned. Does it violate some core principle among bitcoiners? Yes. But I'm just going to shrug my shoulders on this one. I am not a purist.

What principle?
I don't agree with you but I'm more powerful so I will hurt you?

So you basically agree that an exchange should delist a coin, be it a shitcoin like btcsv just because he doesn't like the attitude of the team behind it.  Shitcoin or not shitcoin, that thing is the 16th most traded coin, and will get delisted ..why?
Because somebody doesn't like CW?

I don't like him at all and I have never touched nor his coin not any other altcoins except for dumping my BCH but this is simply stupid.
What if next, he will say that he is concerned that the CIA is behind BTC and chooses to delist bitcoin, are you going to applaud his move again?

What is the difference between this guy threatening to delist coins and getting congratulations by the mob and Chavez nationalizing private business and houses in the applause of the angry mob?

Sorry but if we're replacing bank with exchanges run by this kind of people, then count me out.
I'm more comfortable with the former.

Oh....and nothing about the merit remark? Nothing?  

So why are we always slandered by the government and the media as one of the biggest scams? Why don't we sue fools who have declared this? I do not agree with this, and I believe he cannot win this case.

So let's agree to disagree. This is an industry with sociopaths. CZ is taking a stand on principle. Yes, that does conflict with some of the ideals of bitcoin, but like I said, Binance regularly delists coins for various reasons. There is no reason to take shots at Binance for this and to be silent when they delist coins due to low volume - that's also a centralized action.

All I am saying is taking a stand based on principle - as opposed to the pure passivity of decentralization - is not exactly so objectionable. I do not believe in robotic acquiescence acording to some predetermined principle. Arguably, the problem with hyper-decentralization is that it allows too many psychopaths to thrive - hence why humans evolved in a communal, centralized fashion and tendency.

 
Further proof you have no idea what you're talking but that can't stop you on your quest to reach 100 posts a day, right?
Kiddo, you have earned 5 merits, I have earned 504 !!!


Again, gibberish, nothing to do with what I've asked you.
But nice to see you have done 4 lines of text now, not 3.

The community is not exactly opposed to CZ taking a stand against Faketoshi. I just happened to give my opinion that jives with the community in large part. I honestly don't think everything has to be decentralized, and if people don't like Binance they can go elsewhere. In fact, Binance is about to set up a decentralized exchange, so people can go there instead. They choose which cryptos to list and which to kick out - that's the nature of Binance.

I mean damn. You don't need to hate on a lower-ranked member with more earned merits than you. But of course, that's irrelevant to the point of this thread.

Don't you think that rather than posting 46 posts in a single day !!!! you should actually take a look at what you're posting and how you're answering questions?
Don't try to fake conversation with me by doing your usual 3 lines crap.
If you can't understand what I'm asking, do some research, if you don't know what to answer nobody is forcing you to do so,