CREAMcoin [CRM] • 0.18.1.0 • Skein • POW - page 34.

mitch8128

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

g'day @creamteam i just have a question about the masternodes, specifically the payouts.
so, every transaction of 0.4 shows up as a random number, anywhere between 200 and 100,000, and the reward frequency seems to vary allot.
so here is my question, are the masternode payouts related to transactions made by users?
for example if my masternode processes a transaction by a user do i then receive a reward, making it so that the more transactions happening equals more frequent payouts?
i would really like an answer to this as it is very hard to find this info online.
thanks guys and im super keen for the upcoming news! Wink

cryptozone

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

Great job team. Halloween is coming Wink

mitch8128

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

would like to participate in campaign but unfortunately i don't have twitter Cry

CREAMteam

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

https://creamcoin.com

halloween twitter campaign tommorow, along with news about Creamcoin progress, stay tuned.

CREAMteam

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

https://creamcoin.com

Quote from: AltsBoom on October 23, 2017, 01:55:21 PM

Neat update, never heard of bitscreener but it seems to breakdown the coins accurately. A coinmarketcap competitor with a bit more technical analysis in it's charts

Agree, btw

Cream to WorldcoinIndex

https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/cream

Have some nice tools there:

list

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cream/
https://bitscreener.com/coins/cream
https://www.cryptocompare.com/coins/crm/
https://www.cryptonator.com/rates/CRM-BTC/1
https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/cream
http://coincap.io/CRM

Mining Profit Calculator

http://whattomine.com/coins/206-crm-x11

AltsBoom

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

Neat update, never heard of bitscreener but it seems to breakdown the coins accurately. A coinmarketcap competitor with a bit more technical analysis in it's charts

CREAMteam

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

https://creamcoin.com

Cream on bitscreener:

https://bitscreener.com/coins/cream

CREAMteam

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

https://creamcoin.com

Quote from: Vitala on October 22, 2017, 10:30:39 AM

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 20, 2017, 06:42:03 PM

Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjg

In this version I receive errors like

Code:

/usr/bin/ld: librevolvercoin_common.a(librevolvercoin_common_a-blake.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

I tried to write string

Code:

HARDENING+=-fPIC

in makefile.unix , but it didn't help, error is the same

This looks like cross-compiling problem. It seems it can't compile on 64bit machine that runs ubuntu.
However, you can try to change makefile.unix file - line 99 to:

Code:

xCXXFLAGS=-O2 $(EXT_OPTIONS) -pthread -fPIC -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \

And try again

Vitala

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 20, 2017, 06:42:03 PM

Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjg

In this version I receive errors like

Code:

/usr/bin/ld: librevolvercoin_common.a(librevolvercoin_common_a-blake.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

I tried to write string

Code:

HARDENING+=-fPIC

in makefile.unix , but it didn't help, error is the same

allthebitandbobs

sr. member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 252

sold all my cream coin for a profit whoop whoop .Good buy to shitty staking Grin

spinnycat

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: jota17 on October 21, 2017, 07:08:44 PM

Quote from: spinnycat on October 20, 2017, 07:01:25 AM

10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient Grin

go Cream go!

What announcement?

hi jota17, thats just it, I dont know. The dev posted previously about an announcement that would occur after the bitcoin fork regarding I believe (tell me if im wrong dev!) their blackjack room and also the partnership they have with the technology firm and cream products. The dev's post if you click back, is in this thread.

jota17

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

Quote from: spinnycat on October 20, 2017, 07:01:25 AM

10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient Grin

go Cream go!

What announcement?

chrysophylax

legendary

Activity: 2870

Merit: 1091

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 20, 2017, 06:42:03 PM

Quote from: Vitala on October 20, 2017, 05:04:59 PM

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 18, 2017, 05:18:22 PM

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTtTnN1NVJPT1lOLWs

you might want to fix some permissions just in case: go to [cd CREAM-v1.1.1.2-test | cd src | cd leveldb]
run: chmod +x build_detect_platform

Compile:
make -f makefile.unix

I tried to compile it, but I took this error:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization
bool* pfMissingInputs = false;

I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)'
if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){

Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way?

Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjg

hehehe ...

this looks like you are using an os ( like we are ) that uses gcc6x or gcc7x - which uses different syntax to compile ...

#crysx

CREAMteam

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

https://creamcoin.com

Quote from: Vitala on October 20, 2017, 05:04:59 PM

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 18, 2017, 05:18:22 PM

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTtTnN1NVJPT1lOLWs

you might want to fix some permissions just in case: go to [cd CREAM-v1.1.1.2-test | cd src | cd leveldb]
run: chmod +x build_detect_platform

Compile:
make -f makefile.unix

I tried to compile it, but I took this error:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization
bool* pfMissingInputs = false;

I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)'
if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){

Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way?

Try with this another test2 version: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTta3poenV0ejllNjg

Vitala

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 18, 2017, 05:18:22 PM

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4KANlluFwTtTnN1NVJPT1lOLWs

you might want to fix some permissions just in case: go to [cd CREAM-v1.1.1.2-test | cd src | cd leveldb]
run: chmod +x build_detect_platform

Compile:
make -f makefile.unix

I tried to compile it, but I took this error:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:978:29: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ in initialization
bool* pfMissingInputs = false;

I found the same error with a solve, made the same (changed ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ in 2 files), and then I received this message:

Code:

darksend.cpp: In member function ‘bool CDarkSendPool::IsCollateralValid(const CTransaction&)
darksend.cpp:977:71: error: cannot convert ‘bool’ to ‘bool*’ for argument '4' to 'bool AcceptableInputs(CTxMemPool&, const CTransaction&, bool, bool*)'
if(!AcceptableInputs(mempool,txCollateral, false, pfMissingInputs )){

Should I continue changing ‘bool*’ to ‘bool’ or is it wrong way?

pshemek

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

announcement hmm i must have missed something here, but anyway looking forward to hear what it is.

spinnycat

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

10 days till the announcement...oh no now alot closer, until the Cream announcement! Excited. And terribly impatient Grin

go Cream go!

nezero

full member

Activity: 276

Merit: 102

What sort of x11 hash rate do you get? I suspect not, seeing as there is an army of 17-19+GH/s ASIC miners on route to their new homes. Even those will not be seeing much profit after they are all switched on!

greven83

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

is this coin worth mining with 4 1070 and 2 1080ti?

Vitala

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

Quote from: CREAMteam on October 18, 2017, 05:18:22 PM

It's not on Github, we don't want to make it public until is tested, to avoid confusion, so here is download link:

I have downloaded it and will try later. Thanks.

Topic: CREAMcoin [CRM] • 0.18.1.0 • Skein • POW - page 34. (Read 137530 times)