Topic: Crypto Gambling Review Site - page 7. (Read 3686 times)
If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.
Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.
Yeah, also i think mostly review sites didn’t provided accurate rating about casino sites, because of they're paid of SCAM or shit gamble sites owners as like 1xbit, otherwise how it can be top 5 position i see in the some review sites, definitely those are manipulated. Personally i following this forum in gambling section to get real information about a casino site. 
Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.
It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer. majority are BS in which taking payments to their site that will be feature .
Maybe we need to take a look deeply in the site that we will be depositing , that is the reason why we are responsible to our own payments.
You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.
That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money. If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site. Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.
There are casinos which have reliable reviews from those first-hand experience of satisfied players. Most of these kinds of review is legitimate since it's have tried the quality of service and is talking from experiencing it maybe for a short period of time or even a long duration already. Many casinos has still verified reviews which the newbies from gambling could take some advice from. However, there are also gambling websites that pay people just for the sake of leaving a good review on their site. It's either a sponsored review incline with the casino, or a paid review in partnership with them.
There are also people who advertise because they are paid. In fact, there are already many posts here regarding that matter. They specifically call it 'shilling' and it's also happening in gambling industry not only in coins. Hence, people should really make an in-depth research before getting into it. Just like what you have said, it's a good idea to read even hundreds of posts regarding site reviews just to make sure they are unbiased and completely objective.
And when reading a topic, posts from beginners and low ranks can be skipped, not read, especially if it seems to you that this is a custom text and this user himself is paid. Then you can't trust him.
But, after reading what they write in the last 100-150 posts of a particular topic, you can definitely draw conclusions about this casino.
You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.
That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money. If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site. Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.
There are casinos which have reliable reviews from those first-hand experience of satisfied players. Most of these kinds of review is legitimate since it's have tried the quality of service and is talking from experiencing it maybe for a short period of time or even a long duration already. Many casinos has still verified reviews which the newbies from gambling could take some advice from. However, there are also gambling websites that pay people just for the sake of leaving a good review on their site. It's either a sponsored review incline with the casino, or a paid review in partnership with them.
There are also people who advertise because they are paid. In fact, there are already many posts here regarding that matter. They specifically call it 'shilling' and it's also happening in gambling industry not only in coins. Hence, people should really make an in-depth research before getting into it. Just like what you have said, it's a good idea to read even hundreds of posts regarding site reviews just to make sure they are unbiased and completely objective.
I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.
There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.
That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
* This message is not written with the aim of insulting Cryptogamblr but describes the actions of certain sites similar to this. *
Don't forget the main reason why this kind of websites exists. It is to make money by referring the players. Before taking the advice of any website as somebody mentioned go to BTT to see if the casino can be trusted. It ain't a problem for them to write good reviews if they are making a good cut from that.
You are right, sometimes I questioned a lot what they took into account to make decisions to see what factors they based on to make the review and why they chose those casinos as good when they had a bad reputation within our forum and their answer is that They were based on other factors such as withdrawals, promotions, bonuses, but in the end, if this is not verified, then it is not possible to speak well or badly, I think that is the detail that is lacking.
That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
Here you can even understand how the casino review site objectively presents information, or does it write custom reviews for money. If the data of such a site at least approximately corresponds to the feedback from BTT, then you can trust this site. Because it is in BTT that I think the most objective posts are from direct casino users.That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
And it is worth reading about 100-150 recent posts in the topic about the casino and you will get an objective picture of events.
I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.
There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.
That is why every site that makes reviews would be convenient if they could review the forum and the reputation of each site before making or submitting a review, it is more convenient, so they do not earn a bad reputation.
It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment.
It's too good to be true and I think that they reviewed each website themselves. The only intriguing about his kind of review site is most of them are paid provide a good reviews or they hire someone else to review and get paid and I think this will link to a misleading review which we know that unknown gambling site are mostly scams and pretending to have a lot of user are playing on their site. By there we can easily detect if who is telling the truth and who is not, unlike to the common review sites where the review are only made by themselves and they also don't allow comments on their website. I think they are afraid to be judged by others. Not all unknown sites are scams but there are sites that aren't advertised in this forum and already have a good number of customers.
On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.
It will be a surprise if a scam casino and new one has already been given with a good rating.That concludes that they've been really offering a service to make those names good through reviews. But I'm not closing my understanding that there are reviews that are legitimate.
Sometimes we're just curious because we're not expecting one to be reviewed great but then they do.
Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.
It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment.It's too good to be true and I think that they reviewed each website themselves. The only intriguing about his kind of review site is most of them are paid provide a good reviews or they hire someone else to review and get paid and I think this will link to a misleading review which we know that unknown gambling site are mostly scams and pretending to have a lot of user are playing on their site.
Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.
It is difficult (impossible to know) either a review has been done for large deposit/wins or not. And also the review has been paid or not (if the review done by user) but if the review done by the team of the review site then we should know that the review has been added for the payment they received.Though They will add review for the reputed gambling site without receiving any payment. 
On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.
you should know that review sites are not that competent to be trusted and they are not even worth following .
All this actual falsification of data certainly takes place in the publications. But it is really very difficult to do an objective study and it takes a significant amount of time. Few people can afford such research. Therefore, we will almost never get an objective result if we compare many sites. It remains to be content only with what is published, but it is critical of this information.
And about BTT, I think everyone knows very well, but they cannot seriously influence the opinion of individual, completely independent BTT users.
You are right most of the reviews sites are either to lazy to make out time to fine out the true nature of a casino by trying it out to have first hand information and also making contact with the right users to have their own experiences about the casino, that is why the responsibility is placed on the individual player to look for information about the casino their want to play on.And about BTT, I think everyone knows very well, but they cannot seriously influence the opinion of individual, completely independent BTT users.
On the other hand some of this are so chucked up with corruption that their are paid to give out false scores in their reviews just to lure players.
What I mean is that we don't even know whether the reviewer has really played or just wants something like a task that must be completed to get a reward.
We cant know either they really played or not and also there is another important fact if they not played then nothing to say but if they really played but still I am confused either the site is legit or not because they may played with a little fund which might not be scammed but while we deposit with large fund and win then the site may turned into scam.That's right some scammed casino really doing great if you win a small amount or deposit small amount too but when you deposit a big amount and win then there's a problem of the withdrawal and sometimes it leads to lost your money..
Some review of other casinos we can not sure if that is true if that review are came from a gambler that deposit a big amount and no problem with the withdrawal.
The biggest set back is that most of those casino reviews sites are not members of this forum and at that are unaware of what is going on in regards to the reputation but what I except from verified review is the fact that their carry out adequate research and investigation before making their review.
But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.
All this actual falsification of data certainly takes place in the publications. But it is really very difficult to do an objective study and it takes a significant amount of time. Few people can afford such research. Therefore, we will almost never get an objective result if we compare many sites. It remains to be content only with what is published, but it is critical of this information. But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.
And about BTT, I think everyone knows very well, but they cannot seriously influence the opinion of individual, completely independent BTT users.
I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.
There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
But then reversed is the result as most reviews are now done with the influence of corrupt administration and at the end send out wrong reviews.
I have seen some sites that are listed on many review sites who are fraudulent and are known scammers that's is the major reasons why I never trust the judgement of review sites as their judgements are biased and base on the money paid by the casino operators of simply because of the popularity of the casino resulting from widespread of promotional activities.
There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
How curious I have also come across sites that are specialists in reviewing casinos, and they consider good casinos to some that here in our forum have them on the blacklist, and that their illicit acts or scams have really been verified, I think that sometimes they give those review notes because the users who do it are relatively new to their job and from such a variety of casinos, for them it is quite a lot of work, but there is a good reason that they should know important things that is the reputation of each casino on our forum, I encourage new reviewers to do a search on our forum for reputable casinos before giving a review.There is no need to get a review rating from an online platform when you can make some research about the casino and see players feedback then make your judgement from there.
What I mean is that we don't even know whether the reviewer has really played or just wants something like a task that must be completed to get a reward.
We cant know either they really played or not and also there is another important fact if they not played then nothing to say but if they really played but still I am confused either the site is legit or not because they may played with a little fund which might not be scammed but while we deposit with large fund and win then the site may turned into scam. 
Exactly and this is why I don't believe in online review scores as their are easily bought, I have visited some review platforms and have gone through their records and sometimes one can easily see the corruption that have out played reality as some bad casinos are rate as the best on some of those review sites.
It is not a wise decision too to believe or depends on only the review site as they can promote scam site too to earn a small amount of money both from referral commission and/or they may earn money for listing the scam site. So, before depositing we should analyses the site to be safe from the scammer. It's too risky indeed if you refer to it, it would be better if you look at real reviews and one of them in this forum we can know which ones are good and which ones are not
Jump to: