Other than the messaging platforms that you said, we can also post the problem directly to the public chat of a gambling sites so that other players are going to get aware of the issue. Some gambling sites also have their own communities or forums, you can also create a topic there.
From those who has messaging option for example (telegram chat/Facebook chat etc) can be manipulated from alt account/accounts and also they might be able to delete any negative comment/views from telegram group and they can do the same on other messaging chat. I think bitcointalk forum is the best one from where we can get enough information about a gambling site by asking on the forum if that is not listed on the forum and if listed then there is already enough information. 
Topic: Crypto Gambling Review Site - page 6. (Read 3686 times)
With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
What you don't really know is that many of the reviewed gambling platforms are present in this forum with thousands of users. Thee are more than 200 gambling platform on this forum and we need to work with the one that suit our interest since there are many we can choose from. I don't know why I keep seeing sites that are curious about running a review for gambling platform.We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
So gambling review websites do in fact fulfill a need for those gamblers, however this also exposes them to become victims of scams as it is not rare at all to find websites which exchange fake reviews in exchange for money.
From such reviews, the reader usually receives general information about what game options are offered in this particular casino. But usually the whole thing lies in the nuances that are not written in the reviews. And they don’t write because almost always these nuances (for example, possible difficulties with the withdrawal of the won cryptocurrency) create additional difficulties for the player. And what can be written here, except that the support will solve all the problems? But with such a solution to problems, you still have to be seriously nervous and worried. Naturally, no author of the review will write a word about such a situation.
In some cases the official telegram group from here is here if there is a difference of opinion but if they are here with the tide of mythology then I think they will post the purpose of the discussion here but I think it will be read. But it will probably try to solve it from there so the problem here is so I think you have to be interested to know if there is bad security hidden here and what to do 
Other than the messaging platforms that you said, we can also post the problem directly to the public chat of a gambling sites so that other players are going to get aware of the issue. Some gambling sites also have their own communities or forums, you can also create a topic there.
From such reviews, the reader usually receives general information about what game options are offered in this particular casino. But usually the whole thing lies in the nuances that are not written in the reviews. And they don’t write because almost always these nuances (for example, possible difficulties with the withdrawal of the won cryptocurrency) create additional difficulties for the player. And what can be written here, except that the support will solve all the problems? But with such a solution to problems, you still have to be seriously nervous and worried. Naturally, no author of the review will write a word about such a situation.
I think if something happens such situation will be published in the official telegram group (if any) or discord, but if they are gamblers from the forum then it will be posted on the topic for discussion purpose, so all gamblers will be open to solving problems so I don't think there are bad nuances hidden.Other than the messaging platforms that you said, we can also post the problem directly to the public chat of a gambling sites so that other players are going to get aware of the issue. Some gambling sites also have their own communities or forums, you can also create a topic there.
With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
What you don't really know is that many of the reviewed gambling platforms are present in this forum with thousands of users. Thee are more than 200 gambling platform on this forum and we need to work with the one that suit our interest since there are many we can choose from. I don't know why I keep seeing sites that are curious about running a review for gambling platform. We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
You are right and this is exactly why you will find that most reputable and honest review websites are being operated by real gamblers who have long years of experience in this field and they certainly know how to properly evaluate a casino. Usually, just by reading the few first lines from a review, you would know if it was written by someone who knows what he is talking about and have tested the casino with real money or by a freelance article writer.
In any case, a good review website should allow visitors to comment on reviews so they can share their own experience and add more information that the reviewer might have forgotten to mention in his article.
Many times we can even tell if the review website is legitimate by just taking a look at the rankings they have put in place by themselves, if in the top 10 you see casinos that are very famous and that we know have been here for a long time and that have a good reputation then you can tell the website is an honest one.In any case, a good review website should allow visitors to comment on reviews so they can share their own experience and add more information that the reviewer might have forgotten to mention in his article.
But if you see that there are a bunch of unknown casinos and some of them have been accused a lot of times in this forums of being scams then you know the website is not worth your time, as most likely they do not care about the reputation of the casinos at all and they just want to be paid to promote those casinos.
From such reviews, the reader usually receives general information about what game options are offered in this particular casino. But usually the whole thing lies in the nuances that are not written in the reviews. And they don’t write because almost always these nuances (for example, possible difficulties with the withdrawal of the won cryptocurrency) create additional difficulties for the player. And what can be written here, except that the support will solve all the problems? But with such a solution to problems, you still have to be seriously nervous and worried. Naturally, no author of the review will write a word about such a situation.
I think if something happens such situation will be published in the official telegram group (if any) or discord, but if they are gamblers from the forum then it will be posted on the topic for discussion purpose, so all gamblers will be open to solving problems so I don't think there are bad nuances hidden. Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.
I actually really doubt a review of a particular site to improve the gambling reputation of one of the casino platforms, but it's not bad because just to find more important information, but one of the true reviews is the response from the real community and usually the more the real community will give impact of positive reviews.Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.
I actually really doubt a review of a particular site to improve the gambling reputation of one of the casino platforms, but it's not bad because just to find more important information, but one of the true reviews is the response from the real community and usually the more the real community will give impact of positive reviews. 
Correctly! Only real players, and those who have played enough on a particular site, can write their impressions of the game more objectively. And often even bring some nuances when using this casino. Such information cannot be written by a simple site reviewer, since he simply does not have enough time for a detailed study of the resource. He has a series of site reviews and, accordingly, the quality of the reviews is low.
You are right and this is exactly why you will find that most reputable and honest review websites are being operated by real gamblers who have long years of experience in this field and they certainly know how to properly evaluate a casino. Usually, just by reading the few first lines from a review, you would know if it was written by someone who knows what he is talking about and have tested the casino with real money or by a freelance article writer.In any case, a good review website should allow visitors to comment on reviews so they can share their own experience and add more information that the reviewer might have forgotten to mention in his article.
If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.
Nowadays, there is no more solid trust for gambling review sites, either. After reading some of them, it became apparent that most reviews were biased and unreliable. Because, for example, some reviews are not even written by the real gamblers, but by salespeople of gambling websites or other people who are hired to write them. Other review sites were just copied from one another. So it's hard to rely on any of the reviews written by these review websites. So, apart from using reliable gambling review sites, one should also try to check out more sites which try to be more objective, in order to determine what is a reliable source of information.
Even the trust from the gambling review now can be paid that's why we don't know now mostly where is the most ideal to check the reliable platform and I guess the most ideal source is from the user's experience or the secondary information which comes from the experience of the player who makes play already in that platform and what are the possible cons and pros and if it is suitable for them still it is good if you check and observe too if they are doing well and good at the users taste.
Why is there no cloudbet.com in the ranking of your site?
It's been two months since the OP posted this topic, and he has yet to reply to questions and comments from the community. Therefore, I can only assume that your question will remain unanswered as well, along with other unanswered and much more important questions, such as listing shady casinos such as 1xbit / 1xbet, 22bet, melbet ... and other potentially suspicious sites.
As I said before, this is probably just a paid promotion for some casino sites, or maybe he's just promoting those sites with the best affiliate terms. Whatever the reason, this is not a review site that can be relied upon for accurate, unbiased information.
Why is there no cloudbet.com in the ranking of your site?
With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
Why wait for other people? What if you are the ones that will try it immediately? That saves you time and the advantage of it is that you are more sure because it was yourself that tried it than to the others that we are not sure if they are lying or not. You don't really need to have a big fund to do it but a small amount will do.We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
There are also sites which offers free spins and faucets where you can use so that you won't need to deposit anymore. I don't know if what transparency you mean there because this was a review site and all reviews that they have made should be available for public viewing but that made sense. They wont be a review site anymore if they keep wont be transparent.
With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
Correctly! Only real players, and those who have played enough on a particular site, can write their impressions of the game more objectively. And often even bring some nuances when using this casino. Such information cannot be written by a simple site reviewer, since he simply does not have enough time for a detailed study of the resource. He has a series of site reviews and, accordingly, the quality of the reviews is low.We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
By the way, in the BTT topics on specific casinos, here in the "Gambling" section, you can find very valuable information that you will not learn from the articles in the reviews. And it will be objective.
I agree with the top 4 casino reviews but disagree with the last one. Maybe you will come across a lot of accusations that will make you retract the 95/100 review. Apart from that, your review site is pretty good and not too crowded with lots of unimportant features. My only 1 point suggestion is that you put the reputation of the casino first before leaving a valid review.
I hope you will add Betfury to the list of casinos you will review.
Thank you, and leave us with objective feedback regarding the casinos listed on this forum.
the worst they are including out those casinos/platforms which does have some lots of issues and complaints just like on what you had screenedshot above about 1xbit which shouldnt really be on the list.
Some members had already mentioned on sites which can really be trusted thats why we should really be careful on choosing or reading one.
If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.
Nowadays, there is no more solid trust for gambling review sites, either. After reading some of them, it became apparent that most reviews were biased and unreliable. Because, for example, some reviews are not even written by the real gamblers, but by salespeople of gambling websites or other people who are hired to write them. Other review sites were just copied from one another. So it's hard to rely on any of the reviews written by these review websites. So, apart from using reliable gambling review sites, one should also try to check out more sites which try to be more objective, in order to determine what actually is a reliable source of information.
With many members here who already discussed the topic,it's clear that without transparency of the review,people will not trust it readily.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
We just have to wait for testimony of the people who already tried each site personally,so we can judge if it's worth it or not.
If some casinos offer even small surcharges or just bonuses to some author of a gambling review site, such an author will still agree to post positive information about this casino. But there is also the opposite - some kind of casino can also order anti-advertising of competitors. And also for money. As a result, all information will be so distorted that it will not correspond to the objective picture of events in the casino world at all. So none of the gambling review sites can be trusted.
I agree that there are paid post to either advertise or make an accusation that could destroy the casino's reputation. Hence, it would be best if you would do an in-depth research about the casino you are planning on playing with aside from reading the reviews only on a gambling review site. There are shilling posts and posts written intended to defame a gambling website so that they would have lesser competitor. Anyone can fall victim from these which is why it is still our responsibility to countercheck whether the feedbacks are true or just made up because someone is paid.
It would be hard to verify each reviews since most of the reviews only provide the pen name of the author and not the real name to secure the identity. A person can check it through articles and other reviews on other platforms such as youtube and other gambling site which are known to be reputable of giving true first-hand experience of the players only.
Jump to: