You're accusing me of not including bustabit/bustadice just because they don't offer an affiliate program.
There's no problem in not reviewing a site if they don't have an affiliate program in place, but what RHavar said is exactly why only the affiliated websites are mentioned. You should acknowledge the fact and there's no problem with not reviewing or listing sites you don't want to.
I don't understand what you mean by the "Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year?" - Which casinos are you referring to here?
He said that in response to this
"One of the core principles of the site is that I will never review a site, that I have actively worked for within the past year. I think that's the only fair thing to do in my position."This statement does sound like you have worked for various casinos and hence you don't want to review them yourself.
One interesting thing I saw on your website is that you have mentioned in cons of sites as follows
Stake - We lack to find one.
7bit casino - We lack to find one.
Winz - They don’t accept players from the United Kingdom and United States
If you have any knowledge about stake, they don't accept players from USA as well so either mention the same cons for each casino or just don't mention it for any of them.
I like you have reviewed sites in details but please avoid these small mistakes.
Sure, but I don't mind reviewing them, I also wanna review them truthfully on the same level as all the others.
They're still working in progress though. The priority is getting ones with affiliate done, and then proceed to work on the others.
I'm trying to keep them as updated as possible. There have been a few mistakes like that, but it's impossible to avoid and easier to fix when you come along them. I've updated the Winz one to reflect the others, since all restricted countries is already listed elsewhere in the review.