Topic: 🔥 Crypto-Gambling.Net 🔥 Crypto Casino Reviews By A Real Insider ✅ - page 6. (Read 1602 times)

All sites that are reviewed on my site, have gone through real deposits and withdrawals manually by me to ensure the process is smooth.

I guess what he meant by 'actively worked' here is that he played in those sites with his own money. Could have also meant to say that he worked in several offline casinos.

The KYC part is the main point. That alone deserves a deduction of 1 whole point from the overall rating. Also, Stake deserves a 4-4.5 rating instead of 5 thanks to their laggy interface.

Not to be overly frank, but c'mon. All the links are just undisclosed ref links, and you exclude some of the best and biggest sites (imo bustabit, bustadice) because they don't offer an affiliate program.



Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year? I find that so hard to believe, that I wouldn't even know what position would allow you to do that? 0.0
I also kind of doubt you've worked in the industry at all based on your reviews. Like take the your roobet 4.5/5 rating. It's almost unconscionable to recommend them for any number of reasons. Their house edge is often multiple times greater than their competitors for the same thing, their KYC policies are many times worse, and have a history of highly unethical behavior of giving effectively fake money to streamers to promote their casino.



I actually was once thinking of this. If you talk to some of the real insiders (e.g. some big casino owners), they know a lot interesting of stuff that isn't public and they wouldn't want to come back to them.  One idea I had was you could ask each of the main insiders for a public key, and you could create a (1,n)-threshold scheme where any one of the participants can sign a message but it's impossible to tell which. That way you could get candid information from someone who actually knows what they are talking about, while they know it can't be attributed to them.

Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year? I find that so hard to believe, that I wouldn't even know what position would allow you to do that? 0.0

I also kind of doubt you've worked in the industry at all based on your reviews. Like take the your roobet 4.5/5 rating. It's almost unconscionable to recommend them for any number of reasons. Their house edge is often multiple times greater than their competitors for the same thing, their KYC policies are many times worse, and have a history of highly unethical behavior of giving effectively fake money to streamers to promote their casino.

Not to be overly frank, but c'mon. All the links are just undisclosed ref links, and you exclude some of the best and biggest sites (imo bustabit, bustadice) because they don't offer an affiliate program.



Are you trying to say you've "actively worked for" all these casinos in the past year? I find that so hard to believe, that I wouldn't even know what position would allow you to do that? 0.0
I also kind of doubt you've worked in the industry at all based on your reviews. Like take the your roobet 4.5/5 rating. It's almost unconscionable to recommend them for any number of reasons. Their house edge is often multiple times greater than their competitors for the same thing, their KYC policies are many times worse, and have a history of highly unethical behavior of giving effectively fake money to streamers to promote their casino.



I actually was once thinking of this. If you talk to some of the real insiders (e.g. some big casino owners), they know a lot interesting of stuff that isn't public and they wouldn't want to come back to them.  One idea I had was you could ask each of the main insiders for a public key, and you could create a (1,n)-threshold scheme where any one of the participants can sign a message but it's impossible to tell which. That way you could get candid information from someone who actually knows what they are talking about, while they know it can't be attributed to them.

Honest review of gambling sites based on a gambler experience is really something worth. There was another forum member (GamblingBro) who tried to make review based on his personal gambling experience but haven't heard anything from him after his first review. Hopefully you won't stop making reviews.

In Roobet review cons section you mentioned that “The RTP is higher than on other sites”. RTP means ‘Return to Player’. Actually the higher RTP is beneficial for gamblers. But the RTP is low at Roobet, isn't it? You should correct that. Higher house edge or lower RTP should be in cons section of a gambling site review.

I liked the design of your site and how all the information is neatly organized. However, I found some glaring issues.

- Roobet doesn't have a sportsbook section and you should have deducted more stars since they enforce KYC.

- You reviewed a site that I have never heard of(Winz.io), but you didn't review several popular hotshots like Crypto.Games, Primedice, Sportsbet, Nitrogen Sports etc.

These are just a couple of issues that I observed. Decent first impressions overall!

since you have become a Jr. Member now and it comes with the feature of being able to post images on posts and threads. I suggest Editing and polishing the thread to make it more attractive to possible users in the forum. Good luck!

At first welcome to this forum and it's good to see another insider giving reviews about different casinos.I have gone through 2-3 reviews you have made on Roobet and Stake and found them quite useful and in depth discussion is made for each them like interface, games, account which was nice feature to add on.

Unlike others you are giving reviews of casino you have not been a part of which provides transparency and no partiality on your behalf and keep it the same way.Going through deposit procedure to know the smooth functioning of casino payment gateway is best part on review basis and helps to know exactly how much time it will take and minimum amount for any coin.

Just look at some other sites also like BTCgosu are also geniune players in providing real time review for many casinos is detail and are trusted platform on the forum.

Try to add some more on your list like my signature @Rollbit ,@Duelbits on your updated list and build the trust of players on your site with same principles being followed.

Best wishes to you on your new project.

There is a thread here in this forum that you can check and gather information for your reviews of each site if you have it on your site. I haven't check your site but just in case you have a review of it then this thread will sure be of help. It is about the minimum withdrawal amount and cryptocurrency accepted. Don't mind the withdrawal fee as it might change for some casinos compared to post above that the fee is always $10. Here's the thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/table-withdrawal-fees-and-withdrawal-amounts-on-crypto-casinos-5333602 and welcome to the forum by the way.

That's how a real review really works - with actual deposits and withdrawals and sharing a real gaming experience and not just compiling any positive reviews from various sources on the web or just stating "the site is smooth and user-friendly etc.". Obviously, anyone can say that they are actually doing that but I'm sure you are transparent here. I appreciate that.


Honestly, there is no 100% perfect review because users will have different experiences dealing with a certain site. What matters here is, your review should be updated regularly for let's say, a 1-2 month basis, if possible.

And one thing, I've noticed that some CONS you provided is about a site not having a phone number to contact. Is this really a CONS to be considered especially for a gambling site? What's your input here?

You have missed out several gambling sites that would be worth also into the list.

1. Crypto.games
2. Bitdice.me
3. Rollbit.com

Btw, dont know about that Real insider review.This is something new into my ears.

are you planning on adding gambling game categories that are on a gambling site? I just thought having that kind of feature would help someone using your website that is looking for a specific gambling game on a website and wouldn't have to visit each website to check whether the game they are looking for is available.

anyway, I hope you consider reviewing duelbits.

Not only on your list but old and reputable gambling sites like 777Coin and Bitvest they are worth adding to any gambling review sites, they have proven their worth over the years and they have one of the longest signature campaigns here, I'm sure you have seen these gambling sites their reputation and their features.

You have missed out several gambling sites that would be worth also into the list.

1. Crypto.games
2. Bitdice.me
3. Rollbit.com

Btw, dont know about that Real insider review.This is something new into my ears.

All sites that are reviewed on my site, have gone through real deposits and withdrawals manually by me to ensure the process is smooth.

but I will have to admit that the information provided is not yet 100% thorough, and there are areas to improve,