Topic: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action - page 292. (Read 1006940 times)

Heyyy! You're skipping my jerking!!! I was next, damnit!!! *zippp*

You guys keep redirecting people into a circle.

and i am getting tired of reexplaining.. fuck it.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13586016

Where was proof showing he can be tracked posted ?

So did Big Fat Vern start using a proxy now that some moron printed how he could be tracked? And everyone repeated it in threads the Fat Douchbag is surly reading with his latte?

Stolen coins update (more were confirmed on Craptsy blog)

confirmed:
$6.92M in BTC (11,825 @$585) https://blockchain.info/tx/c7b46a79fd8887038bd3a8e884b04820038415a60e0b9d2c2f5bcff68a2687bf +5x 100BTC txs
$1.88M in LTC (247,508 @0.013 BTC) http://ltc.blockr.io/tx/info/61e61a63f35c951a16870df9e0a34df462ee473fde819d134da9485d2e7d8f44
$154.3k in XC (194,000 @0.00136 BTC) https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?74711.htm
$27.3k in BTCD (37,400 @0.00125 BTC) http://explorebtcd.info/block/46f5ac2dbc92b91e4d4d2f4c698332b6db35b50eadd8516c0196df34d413d8fd

unconfirmed:
$2.16M in Dash (456,501 @0.0081 BTC) http://explorer.dash.org/tx/ba798890d98936115001f69333956b558a4856c162516cb3ab46a6455de7a1eb
$2.05M in DOGE (9.727B @0.00000036 BTC) https://bitinfocharts.com/dogecoin/address/DN27P1saQQ1fYesKP1LHT5MdSXBpgqka85

Up to $13.19M so far (prices on July 29, 2014)

Check this out

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13586016

Does anyone happen to know if trades are also frozen on the biteba9 chinese version of Crypt-Sty?  It shows a 24 hour volume in CNY but it's less than $20 US.

I know crypt-sty has always maintained it isn't their site but the domain registration alone proves otherwise.  Seems like an extra layer of shady to shutdown one exchange because of "H@x0Rz" and leave another exchange running.

Also it was speculated that the wallets on bitbun9hole are actually the same wallets used by crypt-sty so now that I think about it that may account for some of the continued transactions seen on crypt-sty wallets.

EDIT: I also just now noticed that the chat on biteba9holders is hidden just as it was on crypt-sty.

Today I responded to one of the many mandates;
Gretchen
ha detto 3 ore fa
Hello striat,

We do apologize for the late response to your ticket.

We just wanted to follow up and check if you still require further assistance on this issue? If yes, please reply to the ticket and it will re open the case and an agent will assist you. If no, you may disregard this message.

Please feel free to contact us if you have further questions or concerns. Thank you and have a great day!




Sincerely,

Cryptsy Customer Service

CCN story

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/lawsuit-cryptsy-proceed-planned-despite-theft-claim/

When asked if Cryptsy’s claim of a theft would inhibit the filing of the class action lawsuit in any way, Mr. Silver replied:

It’s business as usual. What this appears to be is possibly criminal liability.
He continued, “I represent investors that lose money. The complaints against Cryptsy have been filed and we are waiting on personal service.”

It’s business as usual. What this appears to be is possibly criminal liability. So they suspect criminal activity?

we are waiting on personal service They have not found him to serve him?

Interesting...

http://www.bledsoejacobson.com/CorpOfficer.pdf

I would love to be a fly on the wall when they start deposing vern and the cryptsy employees...  

Agree. We have similar programs in the US for criminals to avoid jail by ratting out bigger criminals. However I'd like to see all of the players in this little scam go to jail. THAT would be some funny stuff... Mullick files a whistleblower complaint, gets a reward, and still ends up in a cell next to Big Vern...

I know what you mean, totally. There are situations where certain people just deserve all the hate from the community. But with an overall view, that whole thing is just bad.

In Germany, we have something where e.g. drug addicts can denounce their dealer. And they get money, depending on how much mat was found when fucking over the dealer. It's just bad.

It would still be kinda funny for some of Paul's underlings who were complicit in the theft to rat his ass out and get some Fed money for it.

Did you read this?? That's in fact very retarded. Denouncing people and giving incentive to do so by offering money is a very bad move for society.

Doesn't mean that I agree with what Paul did in any way. At all.

Did the hackers photoshop Leroy's mug shot too ?

This is an inside job and you need to stop doing such a shitty job as a disinfo agent and shill.

Yeah this dude belongs in jail

Start filing complaints!!!! These fuckers can't ignore a thousand complaint about the same crime

GOXTSY 2.0


Good Posts GoldSeal. ... Gold even.

VERY conflict of interest...

MUCH market manipulation...

WOW! ASSHOLES...

Even Fincen, pays rewards.

5323A. Whistleblower incentives
(a) Definitions
For purposes of this section:

(1) Bank Secrecy Act
The term  Bank Secrecy Act  means this subchapter, section 21 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ( 12 U.S.C. 1829b ), and section 123 of Public Law 91–508 .

(2) Covered judicial or administrative action
The term covered judicial or administrative action means any judicial or administrative action brought by FinCEN under the Bank Secrecy Act that results in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000.

(3) FinCEN
The term FinCEN means the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

(4) Monetary sanctions
The term monetary sanctions, when used with respect to any judicial or administrative action, means—

(A) any monies, including penalties, disgorgement, and interest, ordered to be paid; and
(B) any monies deposited into a disgorgement fund as a result of such action or any settlement of such action.
(5) Original information
The term original information means information that—

(A) is derived from the independent knowledge or analysis of a whistleblower;
(B) is not known to FinCEN from any other source, unless the whistleblower is the original source of the information; and
(C) is not exclusively derived from an allegation made in a judicial or administrative hearing, in a governmental report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the whistleblower is a source of the information.
(6) Related action
The term related action, when used with respect to any judicial or administrative action brought by FinCEN, means any judicial or administrative action that is based upon original information provided by a whistleblower that led to the successful enforcement of the action.

(7) Whistleblower
The term whistleblower means any individual who provides, or 2 or more individuals acting jointly who provide, information relating to a violation of laws enforced by FinCEN, in a manner established, by rule or regulation, by FinCEN.

(b) Awards
(1) In general
In any covered judicial or administrative action, or related action, FinCEN, under regulations it prescribes and subject to subsection (c), shall pay an award or awards to 1 or more whistleblowers who voluntarily provided original information to FinCEN that led to the successful enforcement of the covered judicial or administrative action, or related action, in an aggregate amount equal to—

(A) not less than 10 percent, in total, of what has been collected of the monetary sanctions imposed in the action or related actions; and
(B) not more than 30 percent, in total, of what has been collected of the monetary sanctions imposed in the action or related actions.
(2) Source of awards
For the purposes of paying any award under paragraph (1) there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary, and the Secretary may also use funds from the Department of the Treasury Forfeiture Fund and the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund.

(c) Determination of amount of award; denial of award
(1) Determination of amount of award
(A) Discretion
The determination of the amount of an award made under subsection (b) shall be in the discretion of FinCEN.

(B) Criteria
In responding to a disclosure and determining the amount of an award made, FinCEN shall meet with the whistleblower to discuss evidence disclosed and rebuttals to the disclosure, and—

(i) shall take into consideration—
(I) the significance of the information provided by the whistleblower to the success of the covered judicial or administrative action;
(II) the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any legal representative of the whistleblower in a covered judicial or administrative action;
(III) the mission of FinCEN in deterring violations of the law by making awards to whistleblowers who provide information that lead to the successful enforcement of such laws; and
(IV) such additional relevant factors as FinCEN may establish by rule or regulation; and
(ii) shall not take into consideration the balance of any fund described under section 5323(d).
(2) Denial of award
No award under subsection (b) shall be made—

(A) to any whistleblower who is, or was at the time the whistleblower acquired the original information submitted to FinCEN, a member, officer, or employee of—
(i) an appropriate regulatory agency;
(ii) the Department of Justice;
(iii) a self-regulatory organization; or
(iv) a law enforcement organization;
(B) to any whistleblower who is convicted of a criminal violation related to the judicial or administrative action for which the whistleblower otherwise could receive an award under this section;
(C) to any whistleblower who gains the information through the performance of an audit of financial statements required under the Bank Secrecy Act and for whom such submission would be contrary to its requirements; or
(D) to any whistleblower who fails to submit information to FinCEN in such form as FinCEN may, by rule, require.
(3) Statement of reasons
For any decision granting or denying an award, FinCEN shall provide to the whistleblower a statement of reasons that includes findings of fact and conclusions of law for all material issues

(d) Representation
(1) Permitted representation
Any whistleblower who makes a claim for an award under subsection (b) may be represented by counsel.

(2) Required representation
(A) In general
Any whistleblower who anonymously makes a claim for an award under subsection (b) shall be represented by counsel if the whistleblower anonymously submits the information upon which the claim is based.

(B) Disclosure of identity
Prior to the payment of an award, a whistleblower shall disclose their identity and provide such other information as FinCEN may require, directly or through counsel for the whistleblower.

(e) Appeals
Any determination made under this section, including whether, to whom, or in what amount to make awards, shall be in the discretion of FinCEN. Any such determination, except the determination of the amount of an award if the award was made in accordance with subsection (b), may be appealed to the appropriate court of appeals of the United States not more than 30 days after the determination is issued by FinCEN. The court shall review the determination made by FinCEN in accordance with section 706 of title 5.



Did Paul vernon file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) for the $10m withdrawal that he seems to have authorized and hidden? Was Cryptsy compliant in properly segregating customer funds?

WooHoo!!!! Free Money!!! WooHoo!!! Start calling people!!!!

More rewards available from the IRS:

https://www.irs.gov/uac/Whistleblower-Informant-Award/

Like - Click this link to Add this page to your bookmarks Share - Click this link to Share this page through email or social media Print - Click this link to Print this page
Whistleblower - Informant Award
The IRS Whistleblower Office pays money to people who blow the whistle on persons who fail to pay the tax that they owe. If the IRS uses information provided by the whistleblower, it can award the whistleblower up to 30 percent of the additional tax, penalty and other amounts it collects.
News from the Whistleblower Office
The Secretary of the Treasury reports to Congress each fiscal year on the use of Internal Revenue Code section 7623. The Whistleblower Office Report to Congress for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2014 was released on July 6, 2015. Reports for prior years are also available.
The IRS Whistleblower Office is testing a proposal to send annual letters to whistleblowers to notify them that the IRS still has their claim under consideration. Letters will be sent in March and April 2015.
Commissioner Koskinen Statement regarding Whistleblower Program dated August 20, 2014
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement Memorandum dated August 20, 2014
Treasury issued final regulations to implement section 7623 effective on August 12, 2014: The regulations generally apply to claims that are open as of the effective date. Section 301.7623-4, which contains the rules for determining the amount and payment of awards, applies to claims for award under section 7623(b) that are open as of August 12, 2014, and to information submitted after that date. The amount and payment of awards under 7623(a) for information received prior to August 12, 2014 will be paid under the rules described in the Internal Revenue Manual.  
Sequester Notices
Fiscal 2016 Sequester Notice from Whistleblower Office effective October 1, 2015: Impact on whistleblower payments.
Fiscal 2015 Sequester Notice from Whistleblower Office dated October 1, 2014: Impact on whistleblower payments.
Fiscal 2014 Sequester Notice from Whistleblower Office dated October 1, 2013: Impact on whistleblower payments.
Fiscal 2013 Sequester Notice from Whistleblower Office dated March 1, 2013: Impact on whistleblower payments.
Information About Submitting a Whistleblower Claim
Who can get an award?
The IRS may pay awards to people who provide specific and credible information to the IRS if the information results in the collection of taxes, penalties, interest or other amounts from the noncompliant taxpayer.
The IRS is looking for solid information, not an “educated guess” or unsupported speculation. We are also looking for a significant Federal tax issue - this is not a program for resolving personal problems or disputes about a business relationship.
What are the rules for getting an award?
The law provides for two types of awards. If the taxes, penalties, interest and other amounts in dispute exceed $2 million, and a few other qualifications are met, the IRS will pay 15 percent to 30 percent of the amount collected. If the case deals with an individual, his or her annual gross income must be more than $200,000. If the whistleblower disagrees with the outcome of the claim, he or she can appeal to the Tax Court. These rules are found at Internal Revenue Code IRC Section 7623(b) - Whistleblower Rules.
The IRS also has an award program for other whistleblowers - generally those who do not meet the dollar thresholds of $2 million in dispute or cases involving individual taxpayers with gross income of less that $200,000. The awards through this program are less, with a maximum award of 15 percent up to $10 million. In addition, the awards are discretionary and the informant cannot dispute the outcome of the claim in Tax Court. The rules for these cases are found at Internal Revenue Code IRC Section 7623(a) - Informant Claims Program, and some of the rules are different from those that apply to cases involving more than $2 million.
If you decide to submit information and seek an award for doing so, use IRS Form 211. The same form is used for both award programs.



If he wasn't reporting a $10m theft to anyone, do you think he told Cryptsy's accountant when they filed Paul's and Cryptsy's taxes? Here's your chance to get more free money!!!! Ready!!! Set!!!! Go!!!