Topic: [DB.RCLMR] DeepBit "Reclaimer" ASICs - page 2. (Read 46359 times)
Josh, said that there was going to be testing units taken out of the wafers that he received in this batch. He said, "It will take 1000 of the 5000 that he has now. I still mine on GPU's. I get free electric. Made a little money so far. The CGminer developer had an all expense paid trip to BFL to give support to CGminer. There has been pictures taken of their lab. I have also seen them unloading the same pieces of contraption out of what looks like a semi trailer. They have a lab. They have machines that looked like they were going to be making something. I myself think that Josh is just young to business and he is having a hard time getting what he wants out of the companies that he is dealing with. Look for more posts from kolivas. He knows what is going on more than anyone. He may have worked with a proto-type or something.
seems alot of fly by nights these days
Dead, resting, or quietly working behind the scenes?
Anyway, as suggested I send a PM to [Tycho] a few minutes ago...
More then two weeks now and still no response... I'd guess this ASIC is dead.
any new info about this project?
still maybe closer than some others 
Any news on theses and whats the difference in theses due to cost compared to other ASICs
They are exactly the same in every regard
Any news on theses and whats the difference in theses due to cost compared to other ASICs
Hmm, I always thought [Tycho] and DeepBit were the same user, so that DeepBit should have been able to answer:
Anyway, as suggested I send a PM to [Tycho] a few minutes ago...
Quote
Name: DeepBit
Posts: 801
Position: Donator
Date Registered: October 10, 2011, 05:36:36 AM
Last Active: January 03, 2013, 03:56:46 PM
Posts: 801
Position: Donator
Date Registered: October 10, 2011, 05:36:36 AM
Last Active: January 03, 2013, 03:56:46 PM
Anyway, as suggested I send a PM to [Tycho] a few minutes ago...
What ever happened to these?
Yepp, I would be interested a current status too.
Quote
Name: [Tycho]
Posts: 1827
Position: Staff
Date Registered: March 28, 2011, 03:20:45 PM
Last Active: October 16, 2012, 08:57:30 PM
Posts: 1827
Position: Staff
Date Registered: March 28, 2011, 03:20:45 PM
Last Active: October 16, 2012, 08:57:30 PM
Send the staff member a PM, and the next time he logs on, he'll promptly provide a status update.
What ever happened to these?
Yepp, I would be interested a current status too.
the prices suck balls compared to other manufacturers, that's what happened
Estimated product performance
the prices suck balls compared to other manufacturers, that's what happened
What ever happened to these?
Looks like someone posted wrong info in the bitcoin wiki, so I should make things clear.
1 bond doesn't represents 1 GH/s, rather 80 USD of listed price.
So Reclaimer One costs 4 bonds for 4 GH/s and Reclaimer RM costs 35 bonds for 80 GH/s.
1 bond doesn't represents 1 GH/s, rather 80 USD of listed price.
So Reclaimer One costs 4 bonds for 4 GH/s and Reclaimer RM costs 35 bonds for 80 GH/s.
Your icbit.se site is a total fail. Unusable, try again.
How very interesting, he announced this in ~December of 2011 on IRC, and then a bit later swore that no such thing existed. Does it take that long to design?
I don't remember saying that this this never existed. Can you provide a quote ?Yes, the project was started almost a year ago, but it was far from actual IC design stage.
How very interesting, he announced this in ~December of 2011 on IRC, and then a bit later swore that no such thing existed. Does it take that long to design?
Enterpoint comes to mind, the way they handled the Cairnsmore1 development and release was magnificent compared to most other developers of similar hardware.
Is that the one that just recently got a working bitstream > 800MH/s?Not true. I was watching Enterpoint's thread quite closely and I think the bitstreams Enterpoint made available on their website at the time provided around 200-400mh/s, so the cairnsmore board was still earning BTC for early owners during development.
Enterpoint comes to mind, the way they handled the Cairnsmore1 development and release was magnificent compared to most other developers of similar hardware.
Is that the one that just recently got a working bitstream > 800MH/s?Jump to: