Pages:
Author

Topic: [DB.RCLMR] DeepBit "Reclaimer" ASICs - page 2. (Read 46413 times)

member
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
March 11, 2013, 11:24:05 PM
#71
  Josh, said that there was going to be testing units taken out of the wafers that he received in this batch. He said, "It will take 1000 of the 5000 that he has now. I still mine on GPU's. I get free electric. Made a little money so far. The CGminer developer had an all expense paid trip to BFL to give support to CGminer. There has been pictures taken of their lab. I have also seen them unloading the same pieces of contraption out of what looks like a semi trailer. They have a lab. They have machines that looked like they were going to be making something. I myself think that Josh is just young to business and he is having a hard time getting what he wants out of the companies that he is dealing with. Look for more posts from kolivas. He knows what is going on more than anyone. He may have worked with a proto-type or something.
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 507
Freedom to choose
March 10, 2013, 10:36:58 PM
#70
seems alot of fly by nights these days
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
March 09, 2013, 11:29:58 PM
#69
Dead, resting, or quietly working behind the scenes?
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 100
January 20, 2013, 09:10:49 AM
#68
Anyway, as suggested I send a PM to [Tycho] a few minutes ago...

More then two weeks now and still no response... I'd guess this ASIC is dead.
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
January 10, 2013, 03:48:41 PM
#67
any new info about this project?
hero member
Activity: 792
Merit: 1000
Bite me
January 10, 2013, 04:16:36 AM
#66
still maybe closer than some others  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 07, 2013, 12:43:34 AM
#65
Any news on theses and whats the difference in theses due to cost compared to other ASICs

They are exactly the same in every regard Wink
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001
January 06, 2013, 07:08:34 PM
#64
Any news on theses and whats the difference in theses due to cost compared to other ASICs
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 100
January 04, 2013, 02:37:13 PM
#63
Hmm, I always thought [Tycho] and DeepBit were the same user, so that DeepBit should have been able to answer:

Quote
Name:                 DeepBit
Posts:                  801
Position:              Donator
Date Registered:   October 10, 2011, 05:36:36 AM
Last Active:          January 03, 2013, 03:56:46 PM

Anyway, as suggested I send a PM to [Tycho] a few minutes ago...
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
January 04, 2013, 11:50:27 AM
#62
What ever happened to these?

Yepp, I would be interested a current status too.

Quote
Name:   [Tycho]
Posts:   1827
Position:   Staff
Date Registered:   March 28, 2011, 03:20:45 PM
Last Active:   October 16, 2012, 08:57:30 PM

Send the staff member a PM, and the next time he logs on, he'll promptly provide a status update.
full member
Activity: 225
Merit: 100
January 04, 2013, 03:26:23 AM
#61
What ever happened to these?

Yepp, I would be interested a current status too.
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
December 10, 2012, 02:27:59 AM
#60
the prices suck balls compared to other manufacturers, that's what happened

Estimated product performance
sr. member
Activity: 454
Merit: 250
Technology and Women. Amazing.
December 10, 2012, 01:37:52 AM
#59
the prices suck balls compared to other manufacturers, that's what happened
hero member
Activity: 497
Merit: 500
December 08, 2012, 08:27:27 PM
#58
What ever happened to these?
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
September 28, 2012, 03:50:06 PM
#57
Looks like someone posted wrong info in the bitcoin wiki, so I should make things clear.
1 bond doesn't represents 1 GH/s, rather 80 USD of listed price.

So Reclaimer One costs 4 bonds for 4 GH/s and Reclaimer RM costs 35 bonds for 80 GH/s.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
September 20, 2012, 11:20:11 PM
#56
Your icbit.se site is a total fail. Unusable, try again.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
September 20, 2012, 02:55:26 PM
#55
How very interesting, he announced this in ~December of 2011 on IRC, and then a bit later swore that no such thing existed. Does it take that long to design?
I don't remember saying that this this never existed. Can you provide a quote ?

Yes, the project was started almost a year ago, but it was far from actual IC design stage.
rjk
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
September 18, 2012, 11:45:09 AM
#54
How very interesting, he announced this in ~December of 2011 on IRC, and then a bit later swore that no such thing existed. Does it take that long to design?
full member
Activity: 562
Merit: 100
September 15, 2012, 06:57:59 PM
#53
Enterpoint comes to mind, the way they handled the Cairnsmore1 development and release was magnificent compared to most other developers of similar hardware.
Is that the one that just recently got a working bitstream > 800MH/s?
If by "just recently" you mean over a month ago, then yes. Also they're the ones that had the hardware at my door two days after I made my payment. They handle their business.
Their shipping times are very good then! But answer me this: how many days after you got your product before you could mine at > 800Mh/s?
I was mining at around 750Mh/s within 3 days, and I've been mining > 800Mh/s for a month or more I believe. I didn't mark my calendar. It's not perfect, but I don't expect perfection from every company I deal with. I just would like the companies to not want my money for months so they can make a product I may or may not see at some point in the future.
Ah then you were lucky then. Some of the earlier units waited months for a working bitstream, IIRC.

Not true. I was watching Enterpoint's thread quite closely and I think the bitstreams Enterpoint made available on their website at the time provided around 200-400mh/s, so the cairnsmore board was still earning BTC for early owners during development.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
September 15, 2012, 03:51:12 PM
#52
Enterpoint comes to mind, the way they handled the Cairnsmore1 development and release was magnificent compared to most other developers of similar hardware.
Is that the one that just recently got a working bitstream > 800MH/s?
If by "just recently" you mean over a month ago, then yes. Also they're the ones that had the hardware at my door two days after I made my payment. They handle their business.
Their shipping times are very good then! But answer me this: how many days after you got your product before you could mine at > 800Mh/s?
I was mining at around 750Mh/s within 3 days, and I've been mining > 800Mh/s for a month or more I believe. I didn't mark my calendar. It's not perfect, but I don't expect perfection from every company I deal with. I just would like the companies to not want my money for months so they can make a product I may or may not see at some point in the future.
Ah then you were lucky then. Some of the earlier units waited months for a working bitstream, IIRC.
Pages:
Jump to: