[DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 245.

johanatan

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 19, 2011, 12:40:40 AM

Quote from: johanatan on May 19, 2011, 12:37:18 AM

I'm using the latest poclbm miner. Yes, as I stated in the very first message on this topic, I see several "warning: job finished, miner is idle" messages (the ratio is roughly 1:3 between these warnings and submitted shares).

Looks like that's the reason. PM me your IP, please.
Can you run ping -t deepbit.net in the console and check if there are any packet loss or lags ?
Also try mining on j1.deepbit.net instead deepbit.net and look it the problem is still there.

Ping was normal. j1 still suffers the warnings. One other tidbit-- Windows will not see all 3 of my cards unless I have crossfire enabled. Could that be it?

minerX

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Hey guys.

I'm getting "None" reward on my deepbit for the last 3 blocks found. I was getting rewards before that. Any ideas?

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: johanatan on May 19, 2011, 12:37:18 AM

I'm using the latest poclbm miner. Yes, as I stated in the very first message on this topic, I see several "warning: job finished, miner is idle" messages (the ratio is roughly 1:3 between these warnings and submitted shares).

Looks like that's the reason. PM me your IP, please.
Can you run ping -t deepbit.net in the console and check if there are any packet loss or lags ?
Also try mining on j1.deepbit.net instead deepbit.net and look it the problem is still there.

johanatan

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 19, 2011, 12:30:20 AM

Quote from: johanatan on May 19, 2011, 12:26:39 AM

I did steps 1 & 2--change averaging window to 30 minutes and restart the miners; then check rates. If that's the 'check' you're referring to, I did it. [Otherwise, I wouldn't know what the rates are, now would I?]

I was talking about accepted shares counters, not the hashrate meter.

Mmm, does poclbm give share counts locally? [Although, I have no reason to suspect any discrepancy in share counts anyway; my concern is the rate discrepancy].

Quote

3 overclocked 5870 should give up to 1200 MH/s total.
What miner do you use ? Have you tried latest poclbm or poclbm-gui miner ?
Do your miners show any errors in the console ?

I'm using the latest poclbm miner. Yes, as I stated in the very first message on this topic, I see several "warning: job finished, miner is idle" messages (the ratio is roughly 1:3 between these warnings and submitted shares).

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: johanatan on May 19, 2011, 12:26:39 AM

I did steps 1 & 2--change averaging window to 30 minutes and restart the miners; then check rates. If that's the 'check' you're referring to, I did it. [Otherwise, I wouldn't know what the rates are, now would I?]

I was talking about accepted shares counters, not the hashrate meter.

3 overclocked 5870 should give up to 1200 MH/s total.
What miner do you use ? Have you tried latest poclbm or poclbm-gui miner ?
Do your miners show any errors in the console ?

johanatan

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 18, 2011, 11:18:41 PM

Quote from: johanatan on May 18, 2011, 11:14:17 PM

So, the rate displayed on the site is derived from other measurements? What is the equation for the derivation?

Displayed speed is approximately calculated from number of your submitted shares during last N minutes.
Looks like you didn't checked what I recommended to. Ok, then tell, what video cards you are using ?

I did steps 1 & 2--change averaging window to 30 minutes and restart the miners; then check rates. If that's the 'check' you're referring to, I did it. [Otherwise, I wouldn't know what the rates are, now would I?]

3x ATI 5870

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: johanatan on May 18, 2011, 11:14:17 PM

So, the rate displayed on the site is derived from other measurements? What is the equation for the derivation?

Displayed speed is approximately calculated from number of your submitted shares during last N minutes.
Looks like you didn't checked what I recommended to. Ok, then tell, what video cards you are using ?

Veldy

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Your submission rate, not what you see in your client. There will be times when your hash rate on the pool will be greater than your miner rate. Be patient and learn.

johanatan

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Veldy on May 18, 2011, 08:28:59 PM

Quote from: johanatan on May 18, 2011, 08:27:55 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 17, 2011, 12:55:16 PM

Quote from: johanatan on May 17, 2011, 12:46:49 PM

One factor that complicates things for me is that I switched from Linux to Windows 7. I was seeing > 1.0 Ghash/sec before the switch but after I am only seeing 700 Mhash/sec (although the instant hash rate indicator of poclbm displays the same rate for both).

1) Set your averaging window to 30 minutes
2) Reset your shares counter, launch your miner and check if the miner's shares counter matches with site's counter.

Did these and now it is even less! ~600 Mhash/sec. There has to be something screwy going on.

Blocks are probably larger ... not lucky at the moment. Give it time.

So, the rate displayed on the site is derived from other measurements? What is the equation for the derivation?

Veldy

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: johanatan on May 18, 2011, 08:27:55 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 17, 2011, 12:55:16 PM

Quote from: johanatan on May 17, 2011, 12:46:49 PM

One factor that complicates things for me is that I switched from Linux to Windows 7. I was seeing > 1.0 Ghash/sec before the switch but after I am only seeing 700 Mhash/sec (although the instant hash rate indicator of poclbm displays the same rate for both).

1) Set your averaging window to 30 minutes
2) Reset your shares counter, launch your miner and check if the miner's shares counter matches with site's counter.

Did these and now it is even less! ~600 Mhash/sec. There has to be something screwy going on.

Blocks are probably larger ... not lucky at the moment. Give it time.

johanatan

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 17, 2011, 12:55:16 PM

Quote from: johanatan on May 17, 2011, 12:46:49 PM

One factor that complicates things for me is that I switched from Linux to Windows 7. I was seeing > 1.0 Ghash/sec before the switch but after I am only seeing 700 Mhash/sec (although the instant hash rate indicator of poclbm displays the same rate for both).

1) Set your averaging window to 30 minutes
2) Reset your shares counter, launch your miner and check if the miner's shares counter matches with site's counter.

Did these and now it is even less! ~600 Mhash/sec. There has to be something screwy going on.

Veldy

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 18, 2011, 07:43:02 PM

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 07:19:09 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 18, 2011, 07:03:56 PM

PPS is much easier to predict.

You sure? Cause Its now saying I'm only expected to get about 60% of what It was saying this morning, But my share of the poll has only gone down .02%

It's caused by today's difficulty jump.

The next jump looks to be another 50% Sad

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 07:19:09 PM

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 18, 2011, 07:03:56 PM

PPS is much easier to predict.

You sure? Cause Its now saying I'm only expected to get about 60% of what It was saying this morning, But my share of the poll has only gone down .02%

It's caused by today's difficulty jump.

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 18, 2011, 07:16:45 PM

Any official line on using j1.deepbit.net ?
Can we connect to it if we think it is a better route?

Official line:
I prefer most users to be on deepbit.net, so I can use DNS to switch them manually or automatically to one of the servers in case of failure/maintenance/something.
It's intended not as load-balancing, but as master/hot-spare setup.
So you can mine on j1/j2 only if deepbit.net is unreachable or working bad for you. But in this case you'd better contact me about the problem so I can investigate and fix it.

I'll issue some additional statement if this will change in the future.
Thanks :)

Veldy

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Looks as if the difficulty has gone up again ... that explains my results Sad

244139

At the top of the page: http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/

I wonder why Bitcoin Watch hasn't updated their page.

ataranlen

hero member

Activity: 846

Merit: 1000

The One and Only

Quote from: [Tycho] on May 18, 2011, 07:03:56 PM

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 06:45:12 PM

Glad to contribute to the pool!

Thanks

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 06:45:12 PM

Whats with the change to the calculator? it only shows PPS, not Prop!

It was always like that.
PPS is much easier to predict.

You sure? Cause Its now saying I'm only expected to get about 60% of what It was saying this morning, But my share of the poll has only gone down .02%

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

[Tycho]

Any official line on using j1.deepbit.net ?

Can we connect to it if we think it is a better route?

[Tycho]

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 06:45:12 PM

Glad to contribute to the pool!

Thanks :)

Quote from: ataranlen on May 18, 2011, 06:45:12 PM

Whats with the change to the calculator? it only shows PPS, not Prop!

It was always like that.
PPS is much easier to predict.

ataranlen

hero member

Activity: 846

Merit: 1000

The One and Only

I found two more blocks since my last post here!

"Number of blocks found by you: 3"

Glad to contribute to the pool!

Whats with the change to the calculator? it only shows PPS, not Prop!

m4rkiz

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

yes, it is working i can see website now and tracert ends in right place

Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 245. (Read 1601352 times)