Pages:
Author

Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 50. (Read 1601330 times)

-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Stratum?
Quite possibly.
There are also small chances of implementing "getblocktemplate".
Hopefully this post should help you decide which protocol to choose:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1317574
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
Stratum?
Quite possibly.
There are also small chances of implementing "getblocktemplate".
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
In the fwiw department, I have been mining with deepbit for over a year.  I'm quite happy with it.  Are you going to be able to handle the load when asics start to ship?  I should be going to 90 ghash from my current .800 ghash (i was at 3.6 at one time, but I got rid of my cards early so I could get more out of them.)  I know others probably are going to be doing the same, just don't want to have to find a different pool when I am happy here.
Yes, we have no problems with handling the additional ASIC load, don't worry about that.
We may also support a new protocol more suitable for high-hashrate tasks.
Stratum?
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
Same here...  :-\
Please reset your counters and check again if the problem is gone or not.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
In the fwiw department, I have been mining with deepbit for over a year.  I'm quite happy with it.  Are you going to be able to handle the load when asics start to ship?  I should be going to 90 ghash from my current .800 ghash (i was at 3.6 at one time, but I got rid of my cards early so I could get more out of them.)  I know others probably are going to be doing the same, just don't want to have to find a different pool when I am happy here.
Yes, we have no problems with handling the additional ASIC load, don't worry about that.
We may also support a new protocol more suitable for high-hashrate tasks.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
In the fwiw department, I have been mining with deepbit for over a year.  I'm quite happy with it.  Are you going to be able to handle the load when asics start to ship?  I should be going to 90 ghash from my current .800 ghash (i was at 3.6 at one time, but I got rid of my cards early so I could get more out of them.)  I know others probably are going to be doing the same, just don't want to have to find a different pool when I am happy here.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Hi, DeepBit

Last few days i noticed that my usual hashing speed reduced 10% on deepbit account, but it hasn't changed in my miners. I mine more than year on deepbit and that was never before !

It is not luck - because it is for 3 day already, and both on my GPU and FPGA the same story.


so what is it ?

DNS ?

For Tucho i can explain it in Russian, if you need in PM ?

Same issue for me, about 15% off. Changed DNS provider, restarted router and all miners (cgminer 2.7.6, all report usual speeds). No change.

Looks like same issue for me. Mine shows to be about 20% less than expected.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
I'm checking this issue, will post additional info when available.
Nothing was changed in the pool itself, but there is a chance that this may be caused by our loadbalancer.
member
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
Hi, DeepBit

Last few days i noticed that my usual hashing speed reduced 10% on deepbit account, but it hasn't changed in my miners. I mine more than year on deepbit and that was never before !

It is not luck - because it is for 3 day already, and both on my GPU and FPGA the same story.


so what is it ?

DNS ?

For Tucho i can explain it in Russian, if you need in PM ?

Same issue for me, about 15% off. Changed DNS provider, restarted router and all miners (cgminer 2.7.6, all report usual speeds). No change.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
No, it wasn't my e-mail, probably someone with equal issue !
Then PM me your login name, I'll check if there are any errors.

Nothing was changed at the pool recently, except for one of IPs. Is your DNS up to date ? But I don't think that could be the cause...
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Last few days i noticed that my usual hashing speed reduced 10% on deepbit account, but it hasn't changed in my miners. I mine more than year on deepbit and that was never before !
It was your e-mail about this problem today, or it's someone else ?
No need to translate, I can understand your message.



No, it wasn't my e-mail, probably someone with equal issue !


Can you help with that ?
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
Last few days i noticed that my usual hashing speed reduced 10% on deepbit account, but it hasn't changed in my miners. I mine more than year on deepbit and that was never before !
It was your e-mail about this problem today, or it's someone else ?
No need to translate, I can understand your message.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
Can't you just front with a server with HAProxy and filter there? Or is the volume to big for software balancing?
The problem starts at the DC's routers, even before my servers.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
Hi, DeepBit

Last few days i noticed that my usual hashing speed reduced 10% on deepbit account, but it hasn't changed in my miners. I mine more than year on deepbit and that was never before !

It is not luck - because it is for 3 day already, and both on my GPU and FPGA the same story.


so what is it ?

DNS ?

For Tucho i can explain it in Russian, if you need in PM ?


donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
There should be a permanent solution by now that doesn't involve changing the DNS at all ever! You have huge resources use them! Build a load balancer with IP filtering yourself where WE can tell you what IP our worker connects from! Heck I can build it for you!
I have load balancers, both on site and in different DCs, but sometimes I have to change them, disable for maintenance or fixing or something else. A change in DNS takes just a few minutes if your server is good, but why would anyone use fixed-IP setup or known bad DNS ?
Sometimes the problem is not caused by DNS change.

Technically I have enough resources to perform IP filtering, but I don't know ANY hosting providers that can offer me at least unlimited number of packets-per-second for anything less than tens of thousands USD, that's why I have to use third-party filtering services.
Lem
newbie
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
My payments have been suspended too, so I contacted tycho as requested.
I'm really pissed off, so this is his email and my reply.
BTW: this is my correspondence, received and sent, so I do have the right to publish it.

Quote
Il giorno ven, 02/11/2012 alle 07.39 +0700, [Tycho] wrote:
> Hello.
> First, I would like to inform you that poolhopping is not welcome
> here. Seriously.

First, I would like to inform you that you should write it clearly on
your pool web site
. Seriously.

Quote
> Second, I want to ensure that you got my message. Did you ? 
> Then your payments will be unlocked.

Second, I would like to inform you that your pool has outrageous fees.
The only way to barely cope with them is hopping.

Third, I would like to inform you that the only reason of existence of a
pure prop poll is hopping. Do you want to be the only one hopping on your
prop pool
  (which is obviously much easier for you than for anybody else,
because only you know exactly and in real time when you find a block)?

Fourth, I would like to inform you that my astonishing mining power is
about 1.3GH/s: it's the power of my two 7970s. I earn less than 0.2
bitcoins/day
on your pool: nothing you should even care about.

Fifth, I would like to inform you that, since your stats are delayed,
and since third parties stats often give false positives and false
negatives, my hopping efficiency is much lower than I would like... and
than you would fear (LOL).
Do you want to discourage pool hopping? You're already doing, be happy
with it (or choose another payment system). I try to find workarounds,
just for fun. I won't become rich mining bitcoins.


Sixth, I would like to remember you when I emailed you months ago,
complaining for proportional shares submitted for a round and accounted
by your software for another one
(was it an incredibly strange bug,
or was it intentional? who knows), which is probably the most important
thing a prop poll must NEVER do.
Even on bitcointalk you admitted it did happen.
How comes you didn't say anything about my hopping that time?

Lastly, I would like to inform you that I don't give a fuck whether you like
or don't like your prop pool to be hopped. Your pool is hoppable, so I do hop
it and I will keep on doing it.
Period.
Now, if you don't want to be called a thief, don't steal my 0.027 bitcoins
(huge funds indeed, LOL), and let me withdraw them. Then block my account, if you
like: I will open another one, then another one, then one thousand more.
Got it?

My best regards, sir.




donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
May be fixed now.

Ensure that your DNS server is working normally or try Google's DNS (IP set was changed)
I notice that many miners still use bad DNS servers that aren't respecting TTL values.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
zzzZZZzzz
What do you mean ?

I am having issues connecting. Miner is timing out.
donator
Activity: 532
Merit: 501
We have cookies
Pages:
Jump to: