Can I mine on this pool with cgminer?
I tried connecting but it says it is dead.
I tried username: "username_worker" and just "username" neither get connection.
Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 81. (Read 1601330 times)
May 11, 2012, 11:39:38 AM
May 11, 2012, 07:58:20 AM
I'm looking at the pie @ bitcoin watch and it looks wierd...
BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie.
Use this.BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie.
http://blockorigin.pfoe.be/chart.php
May 11, 2012, 07:07:46 AM
I'm looking at the pie @ bitcoin watch and it looks wierd...
BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie.
Can someone do some math on how much of the unknown is actually deepbit? I suck @ english and math too.
BTC guild with pool speed of 1,591.79 Gh/sec is taking 15% of the pie.
Deepbit with pool speed of 3,198.49 Gh/sec is taking 18% of the pie.
Unknown is 37% of the pie.
Can someone do some math on how much of the unknown is actually deepbit? I suck @ english and math too.
May 11, 2012, 06:52:25 AM
Whats up with the pool? Three invalid blocks in a row?? That's kind of strange...
It's a cross-check glitch, actually those blocks are valid. May 11, 2012, 06:28:56 AM
Same question... 
11.05 11:00:13 3h 32m - Invalid -
11.05 07:27:48 0h 11m - Invalid -
11.05 07:16:24 0h 49m - Invalid -
LoL or?
11.05 11:00:13 3h 32m - Invalid -
11.05 07:27:48 0h 11m - Invalid -
11.05 07:16:24 0h 49m - Invalid -
LoL or?
May 11, 2012, 06:22:41 AM
Hi there!
Whats up with the pool? Three invalid blocks in a row?? That's kind of strange...
Cheers!
Fydel
Whats up with the pool? Three invalid blocks in a row?? That's kind of strange...
Cheers!
Fydel
May 10, 2012, 05:20:32 PM
It looks like the block times are messing up again. shows 3 and 4 hour+ blocks for small ones on the stats page.
Thanks for your report. 
May 10, 2012, 02:47:05 PM
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
To answer your question, I am seeing dropped packets on my router also. Mine are in the 55000+ range. I'll install Wireshark on my rig and see what my source ports are on my packets leaving.
Sam
May 10, 2012, 02:36:25 PM
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
I would run Wireshark on your mining rig and see what the source ports on your packets leaving your machine to Deepbit. The router shouldn't be messing with the source ports on the packets.
Then I would put a dumb hub between your router and ISP device and see what the source ports are from packets leaving your network and compare with packets coming back from Deepbit to see if they've changed.
That way you know for sure where the behavior is introduced.
Sam
May 10, 2012, 01:40:35 PM
Anyone else seeing this in their router log. The from packet is from deepbit and the xx are one of my miners. I'm not using those ports so I'm unsure why deepbit is trying to connect to them.It's multiple different ports in random order. Almost seems like a port scanner.Any info would be appreciated.
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:45353 as ACK received but there is no active connection
Blocked incoming TCP packet from 46.4.121.118:8332 to xxx.xxx.x.x:50774 as PSH:ACK received but there is no active connection
May 10, 2012, 10:02:34 AM
It looks like the block times are messing up again. shows 3 and 4 hour+ blocks for small ones on the stats page.
April 26, 2012, 11:39:39 AM
OK, got it;
Thanks for the info.
Thanks for the info.
April 26, 2012, 10:16:59 AM
Hello,
I switched my workers to PPS, and the reward is rather strange:
I have about 1300 MHashes/sec, and, some rewards are like this:
Time My hashes total hashes reward
26.04 13:14:10 0h 47m 1335 2335729 0.00774512
26.04 07:42:51 2h 32m 3332 7452024 0.00206964
That is, on the "bigger", there are 2.5 times more hashes than in the first block, BUT, the reward is less than the reward for the first block.
There must be some mistake in calculation here.
PS: all rewards are mixed up since I switched to PPS
Please somebody check this out.
Regards,
Dan
I switched my workers to PPS, and the reward is rather strange:
I have about 1300 MHashes/sec, and, some rewards are like this:
Time My hashes total hashes reward
26.04 13:14:10 0h 47m 1335 2335729 0.00774512
26.04 07:42:51 2h 32m 3332 7452024 0.00206964
That is, on the "bigger", there are 2.5 times more hashes than in the first block, BUT, the reward is less than the reward for the first block.
There must be some mistake in calculation here.
PS: all rewards are mixed up since I switched to PPS
Please somebody check this out.
Regards,
Dan
The reward column only shows Proportional rewards. If you are only doing PPS then this column will show PPS in it. If you are doing both PPS and Proportional only the proportional value shows. The PPS and Prop shares are added together in the Shares Total column so it looks like your getting paid less than you really are.
Sam
April 26, 2012, 08:56:33 AM
Hello,
I switched my workers to PPS, and the reward is rather strange:
I have about 1300 MHashes/sec, and, some rewards are like this:
Time My hashes total hashes reward
26.04 13:14:10 0h 47m 1335 2335729 0.00774512
26.04 07:42:51 2h 32m 3332 7452024 0.00206964
That is, on the "bigger", there are 2.5 times more hashes than in the first block, BUT, the reward is less than the reward for the first block.
There must be some mistake in calculation here.
PS: all rewards are mixed up since I switched to PPS
Please somebody check this out.
Regards,
Dan
I switched my workers to PPS, and the reward is rather strange:
I have about 1300 MHashes/sec, and, some rewards are like this:
Time My hashes total hashes reward
26.04 13:14:10 0h 47m 1335 2335729 0.00774512
26.04 07:42:51 2h 32m 3332 7452024 0.00206964
That is, on the "bigger", there are 2.5 times more hashes than in the first block, BUT, the reward is less than the reward for the first block.
There must be some mistake in calculation here.
PS: all rewards are mixed up since I switched to PPS
Please somebody check this out.
Regards,
Dan
April 24, 2012, 02:45:05 AM
...
What I'm trying to get to here is to be able to buy _low cost_ products on the go, where BTC has the greatest advantage (no fees) against VISA, Mastercard, etc. Most stores don't accept card payment under a certain amount, BTC would spread like wildfire if they could add a QR code for immediate BTC payment.
...
Bitcoin has fees - and when the payments get low enough, the fee % effectively gets quite high ...What I'm trying to get to here is to be able to buy _low cost_ products on the go, where BTC has the greatest advantage (no fees) against VISA, Mastercard, etc. Most stores don't accept card payment under a certain amount, BTC would spread like wildfire if they could add a QR code for immediate BTC payment.
...
(and many people seem to want to enforce them more strictly or make them higher)
Yes in general those fees are lower than Credit Cards, but saying there are "(no fees)" is simply incorrect.
Aside: then of course when you try to convert BTC to $ - wow most of the fees charged by the BTC people would make the banks envious ...
(I'm amazed at the number of times I read 'no fees' when looking at exchanges from BTC to $ only to wonder why losing 30% in the process is considered no fees ...)
April 18, 2012, 02:07:35 PM
What happened to the "Avg shares in the last 24hrs" at the top of the Stats page?
Nothing was changed in the last months. 
April 18, 2012, 01:55:44 PM
What happened to the "Avg shares in the last 24hrs" at the top of the Stats page?
April 18, 2012, 12:58:01 PM
Hello, I have PM my login name yesterday, and after 24 hours, still getting "Account_locked".
Unlocked, see PM. April 18, 2012, 11:13:31 AM
Hello, I am getting "Account_locked" while trying to create a new worker or change name of an existing worker. Why? I can still make manually payout.
Probably it was accidentally locked because of poolhopping. PM me your login name.Hello, I have PM my login name yesterday, and after 24 hours, still getting "Account_locked".
April 18, 2012, 08:02:06 AM
We don't know that Deepbit prioritises based on hashrate. Unless Deepbit mentions it, you could only work it out if large representative sample of miners agrees to post a couple of weeks earnings per round somewhere. If Deepbit is prioritising based on hashrate then I wouldn't be surprised if most pools are, and then it's a level playing field - doesn't matter which pool you mine at.
Jump to: