Does it really matter who Satoshi is?
Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?
Oh I love this xD Youre such a good point-prover in a dickish way
Topic: [Debunked] Definitive proof that Satoshi Nakamoto is James A. Donald. - page 3. (Read 7166 times)
May 28, 2014, 06:23:55 PM
Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?
Oh I love this xD Youre such a good point-prover in a dickish way
May 28, 2014, 06:06:42 PM
Quote from: maok
Its hard to understand that someone who comes up with this idea of crypto currency, spends almost 2 years coding it and making sure every angle is covered, would be so reckless to lose access to his coins. I doubt that and I'd be surprised if thats true. I think what he's trying to do by not spending them is protecting the value but still they'll need to enter the system before too late as they represent 5% of the total and it would be a shame if they're lost forever. Maybe once the sha256 becomes obsolete due to quantum computers, hackers will sweep the old sha256 wallets for lost bitcoins so if Satoshi will still be around by then and hadn't introduced the coins into the system he'll be forced moving the coins into the new cryptographic wallets so I guess either way the coins won't be lost.
Or it's possible that the entire thing was an experiment and he didn't expect it to be so successful. Nobody really knows at the end of the day. Keep in mind that for a few years they had no value.
Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App
May 28, 2014, 06:04:23 PM
Its hard to understand that someone who comes up with this idea of crypto currency, spends almost 2 years coding it and making sure every angle is covered, would be so reckless to lose access to his coins. I doubt that and I'd be surprised if thats true. I think what he's trying to do by not spending them is protecting the value but still they'll need to enter the system before too late as they represent 5% of the total and it would be a shame if they're lost forever. Maybe once the sha256 becomes obsolete due to quantum computers, hackers will sweep the old sha256 wallets for lost bitcoins so if Satoshi will still be around by then and hadn't introduced the coins into the system he'll be forced moving the coins into the new cryptographic wallets so I guess either way the coins won't be lost.
May 28, 2014, 04:59:28 PM
Quote from: maok
Quote from: OnkelPaul on Today at 08:55:18 AM
I've just checked the mail archive at metzdowd.com ( http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/).
The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus.
Therefore the correct timestamps are: Sun Nov 2 18:46:23 EST 2008 and Sun Nov 2 20:37:43 EST 2008
The main question is when will Satoshi spend/donate his million BTC ? He advised us to be careful with our wallets so that we don't waste the bitcoins which will be forever lost if we're not careful so hopefully he has a plan of introducing those dormant coins into ecosystem before they are lost forever.
I've just checked the mail archive at metzdowd.com ( http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/).
The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus.
Therefore the correct timestamps are: Sun Nov 2 18:46:23 EST 2008 and Sun Nov 2 20:37:43 EST 2008
The main question is when will Satoshi spend/donate his million BTC ? He advised us to be careful with our wallets so that we don't waste the bitcoins which will be forever lost if we're not careful so hopefully he has a plan of introducing those dormant coins into ecosystem before they are lost forever.
A lot of people are still thinking that satoshis coins aren't accessible anymore. There are a lot that haven't moved in years.
Posted From bitcointalk.org Android App
May 28, 2014, 04:46:40 PM
^^ Nice debunking mate.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
This was fun, but I read some of James A. Donald's blog and I hope to god he isn't the creator of Bitcoin. Seems that for years, the dude has been drowning in butthurt about "COMMUNIST INFILTRATION OF WIKIPEDIA", the scourge of anti-white racism, et cetera...lol wut?
Come back to us, PG!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-summary-of-phinnaeus-gages-investigation-into-brock-pierce-thus-far-628000
For the record, I will do everything in my power to try and debunk my own or PG's theories - it just hasn't worked out yet.
May 28, 2014, 04:40:52 PM
I've just checked the mail archive at metzdowd.com (http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/).
The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus.
The timestamps there are the same as the ones shown in the mit.edu archive. Looks like the mail-archive.com timestamps are bogus.
Therefore the correct timestamps are: Sun Nov 2 18:46:23 EST 2008 and Sun Nov 2 20:37:43 EST 2008
The main question is when will Satoshi spend/donate his million BTC ? He advised us to be careful with our wallets so that we don't waste the bitcoins which will be forever lost if we're not careful so hopefully he has a plan of introducing those dormant coins into ecosystem before they are lost forever.
May 28, 2014, 04:00:45 PM
In my opinion even Phinnaeus Gage don't really believe that James A. Donald is Satoshi indeed 
But his target to make controversy thread is success
But his target to make controversy thread is success
May 28, 2014, 03:20:33 PM
^^ Nice debunking mate.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
You, my friend, are absolutely correct. I always find it hard to take any "proof" around the forums as being real when everyone tries to fit everything into their mold to show things. People throw around identities all day long and then try to find others that they can mold to fit what they're looking for. Innocent people are being brought into the middle of it as a result.
May 28, 2014, 03:16:16 PM
^^ Nice debunking mate.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
Seriously though Phinnaeus, you have been doing some thorough detective work recently, and you have uncovered some apparent links between some people that seem to have questionable motives. However many of your links are circumstantial at best, and your "paedo angle" comments are starting to make you sound like the Daily Mail.
You are approaching this case like a conspiracy theorist, when you should be looking at it like a scientist. A conspiracy theorist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that proves his claims. A scientist thinks of a hypothesis, then tries to find anything that disproves his claims. Concentrate more on disproving your hypotheses, and you will be closer to the truth IMO.
May 28, 2014, 02:08:38 PM
Well spotted, although could it be due to a regional daylight savings time difference which changes around Oct/Nov and the timespan 1:00:42?
Exactly 42 seconds. No added minute.
17:56:27 - 17:55:45 = :42
That's my timestamp, and I'm sticking to it.
Timezone -08:00
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09959.html
Timezone -07:00
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09964.html
Why did Satoshi jump a timezone during the weekend?
Furthermore, why is James A. Donald wasting his time posting about racial violence and useless math trivia, up to Oct 2013, and doesn't participate in Bitcoin?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22James+A.+Donald%22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_A._Donald
May 28, 2014, 01:35:49 PM
Even if the timestamps are accurate, that question almost appears planted to give the opportunity to lend further credence to the idea in the form of "dialogue".
Still, it's all redundant if J Donald is another alias.
Still, it's all redundant if J Donald is another alias.
May 28, 2014, 12:41:12 PM
I just found something interesing (as interesting as this thread..
)
looks like a son of:
so maybe Shinichi Mochizuki is real father of a Bitcoin.
And his real father was Satoshi Nakamoto and maybe there were problems in his family and he have to give back his son to another family and after all those years his son figured out that he love his real father so he name himself as a "Satoshi Nakamoto" to respect his real father name 
Huehue. Conspiracy.
)looks like a son of:
so maybe Shinichi Mochizuki is real father of a Bitcoin.And his real father was Satoshi Nakamoto
and maybe there were problems in his family and he have to give back his son to another family and after all those years his son figured out that he love his real father so he name himself as a "Satoshi Nakamoto" to respect his real father name Huehue. Conspiracy.
Roslinpl. Me + you = making a movie. NOW. Let's get this script drafted before someone else steals it. This is going to be a better love story than Twilight!
May 28, 2014, 12:37:29 PM
I just found something interesing (as interesting as this thread.. )
looks like a son of:
so maybe Shinichi Mochizuki is real father of a Bitcoin.
And his real father was Satoshi Nakamoto and maybe there were problems in his family and he have to give back his son to another family and after all those years his son figured out that he love his real father so he name himself as a "Satoshi Nakamoto" to respect his real father name
Huehue. Conspiracy.
)looks like a son of:
so maybe Shinichi Mochizuki is real father of a Bitcoin.And his real father was Satoshi Nakamoto
and maybe there were problems in his family and he have to give back his son to another family and after all those years his son figured out that he love his real father so he name himself as a "Satoshi Nakamoto" to respect his real father name Huehue. Conspiracy.
May 28, 2014, 12:24:46 PM
I'm 99% sure it's Nick Szabo
Yeah, but who is Nick Szabo? Has anyone ever seen a picture of him? May 28, 2014, 09:46:56 AM
Satoshi is an Aussie
Satoshi is a white male, whom likes anime and Manga.
Prove me wrong
Exactly.
May 28, 2014, 09:44:15 AM
Does it really matter who Satoshi is?
Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?
I'm sensing a lack of awareness of proper analogies here.
May 28, 2014, 09:40:08 AM
I agree with those who said that timestamps are not any proof.
There is something funny in those searchings for Satoshi.
He proved to me that even in the world of computers, Internet and clever people you can stay anonymous if you just know how to do it.
I wish we will never find out who Satoshi is. Tesla should stay anonymous too.
Satoshi! I know that you are reading your forum! It is just something more obvious than a sun on the sky.
I want to thank you one more time for creating a Bitcoin!
There is something funny in those searchings for Satoshi.
He proved to me that even in the world of computers, Internet and clever people you can stay anonymous if you just know how to do it.
I wish we will never find out who Satoshi is. Tesla should stay anonymous too.
Satoshi! I know that you are reading your forum! It is just something more obvious than a sun on the sky.
I want to thank you one more time for creating a Bitcoin!
May 28, 2014, 09:25:26 AM
Does it really matter who Satoshi is?
Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?
This response is yet another reason I hate people.
LETS use yet another pedo exampe to prove my point and... my example has nothing to do with my point at all..!!! What are you CNN?
May 28, 2014, 09:18:02 AM
If they were one in the same I'm sure James would have waited a reasonable amount of time before posting the reply to himself.
May 28, 2014, 09:14:34 AM
Perhaps you are Satoshi since you are very much against us making progress on his identity.
Well I'm Satoshi just as James A. Donald is Satoshi. Aren't we all Satoshi in a sense?
Seriously, since when is stopping folks who are on the wrong track hindering their progress?
There are many more reasonable assumptions about Satoshi's identity than this mail exchange with obviously bogus timestamps that weren't even in the original mails but most likely generated in some later mail system.
Onkel Paul
Jump to: