Pages:
Author

Topic: [Debunked] Definitive proof that Satoshi Nakamoto is James A. Donald. - page 5. (Read 7166 times)

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I often wonder if most of the things you write are just meant as a joke or if you are serious.
In case you are serious:
A timestamp is not really proof for anything. I saw a lot of cases where timestamps are just wrong.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
Does it really matter who Satoshi is?

Does it really matter which teacher at a school is sexually abusing their pre-teen students that your child doesn't attend?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1029
Does it really matter who Satoshi is?
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09959.html



http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09963.html



http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg09964.html





That's my definitive proof clearly showing that Satoshi Nakamoto is indeed James A. Donald, unless I'm missing something so obvious like: Satoshi Nakamoto is so God-like, not only was he at his computer, at the ready, for the first question pertaining to Bitcoin, but when it finally arrived one day later, he not only was able to read the content, but fired up a detailed response, then click post, all within...wait for it...42 seconds.

I can only imagine Satoshi jumping into his DeLorean E-MC2 and heading on down to Milliways after accomplishing such a feat.

I might as well lock this thread now, for no further discussion is warranted, but I guess the most prudent thing to do is see if the poll reflects my claim.

~Bruno Kucinskas
Pages:
Jump to: