* random.org
* cloudflare
* oraclize
As the code doesn't appear to be using random.org's sequences (?), so there's no way to check how many times random.org was asked for random numbers. It just checks that random.org gave a result. It can give any result it wants, and there's no guarantees (unlike a provably fair scheme). But worse, is this means oraclize can ask it as many times as it wants. But the TLS layer is done by cloudflare, so you also need to trust them (they can change the result if they want). There's probably no problem trusting all 3 (?!) parties, but the problem I see is if one of them cheats, it's 100% undetectable.
Now contrast this to going to a bitcoin gambling site, say PrimeDice:
* I deposit money
* I play using a proper dedicated interface, and have instant bets
* I check my results
* I withdraw
So in the vdice case, I'm trusting 3 parties who can cheat me (?) but if they do, I'll never know. And they know I'll never know. Now contrast to PrimeDice, which you do need to trust with the amount you deposit, whoever it's impossible for them to undetectable cheat you. This provides extra incentive for them to be honest.
Anyway, I'm sure i'm missing something as AFAICT it's strictly a step down from current bitcoin gambling? (Disclaimer: I'm very unfamiliar with ethereum and greatly dislike it, so my reading of the contract is likely totally mistaken)
I don't understand. You're saying you trust centralized more than decentralized
We respectfully disagree. That's why we love blockchain.
That's why we made the world's 1st FULLY decentralized gambling platform.
There are technical arguments we both can make.
But I think people in Bitcoin forum understand why decentralization is important.
I'm rooting for you guys...
but honestly it doesn't even seem like you read what Ryan wrote at all.
Just stop trying to make the bold claim that it is 'FULLY' decentralized in every single way. It's decentralized for the most part. Just go with that.