The same bikers club, since it is financially tied to the same place, they just launder/justify themselves regardless of whether they are right or wrong like the same black-red signature club.
The Merit Cycling Club has
nothing whatsoever to do with DT. It is, and always has been, a jab at
those who believe we're conspiring to give each other merit (we aren't), which arose simply because I was bored and tried (perhaps a little too successfully) to make my life more interesting by throwing money at the problem. It's the same problem Freemasons have, except instead of Masonic symbols popping up everywhere, it's gender-confused vulpine cyclists. It's not meant to be taken seriously.
The same bikers club, since it is financially tied to the same place, they just launder/justify themselves regardless of whether they are right or wrong like the same black-red signature club.
The Merit Cycling Club has
nothing whatsoever to do with DT. It is, and always has been, a jab at
those who believe we're conspiring to give each other merit (we aren't), which arose simply because I was bored and tried (perhaps a little too successfully) to make my life more interesting by throwing money at the problem. It's the same problem Freemasons have, except instead of Masonic symbols popping up everywhere, it's gender-confused vulpine cyclists. It's not meant to be taken seriously.
Although
Pull up their merit fans and recipients top 20
Pull up their trust inclusions
Pull up their trust exclusions
Pull up their threads and look for support coming from each other
Pull up their sponsors look for chipmixer, fortune Jack and hhampuz yahoo
Out of a forum of millions or 100s thousands
The same tiny handful of people believe each other are the best posters,
The same tiny handful of people believe each other are the most trustworthy despite some being proven scammers lol
The same tiny handful of people believe the same people are the most untrustworthy despite some of them being the biggest scam hunters in this forums history and have zero trading and no attempts to scam and history of pushing for fairness with projects when it was very unpopular
The same tiny handful all seem to be mostly in control of the best rev stream here
Lol all just a huge ass coincidence and case where logic is reversed.
Of course fox pup does not want you to listen to his opinions because he freely admits his opinions are not formed on the basis of reason. Reason actually should not be employed to form opinions that is what foxpup has said.
Thinks because she has a cute tail and can time travel that it can get away with supporting and protecting scammers.
This will be a mistake eventually.
Not a scammer perhaps and not milking the forum but a total maniac and just wants to be popular
Not enough to give the scammer crew all his merits for shitposting
Now has to pay them to come to the fox hole.
Nullius obviously would pay to attend but nobody wants his wrinkly old nut sack rubbed over their face or to be bored shirtless with his endless droning on in Latin about his neeechy or heart breaking treatment at the hands of alia. Or how showing empathy makes you more of a scammer than a proven scammer like lauda who he wants to cybersex whether lauda is female or male makes no difference lol
Merit is indeed the cancer that has empowered these scumbags.
As they still only mostly give it to each other or their new puppies there is a long road ahead unless people get very united on this matter regardless or if they dont like each other.
All non scammers need to unite to remove these parasites but previous attempts fail due fear they are teaming up with real undesirables.
Some still believe there is a chance to weasel into the gang and become one of them. Forget that it makes you as bad or worse than them
Crushing them is the only way. Appeasing them or working with them now regardless of the deal would demonstrate a weak and diseased character.
Flags are key. I see now the " turning a blind eye" defence will not wash there unless you want to explain in meta to theymos why you are trying to prevent a warning flag based on objective independently verifiable evidence of scamming? That would be far more interesting than the " oh I am not interested or I dont have time right now " excuses .
Of course the " I am not interested in the truth" or " I think it is good when innocent members get a red tag" defences from those like qwk are still there to contend with.
. Regarding other members, slowly ratings talking for themselves, I was kicked out of the best paid signature of the forum thanks to these cunts.
, a great side point:
