Many of your points are clearly bogus.
There is observably a merit cycling self appointing DT that colluded to maintain grasp over lucrative rev streams here
Please stop pretending it is not there for anyone to observe
Or do you expect us to believe these peoples top merit fans and recipients are all stacked with each other, they all include each other on DT and mostly exclude the same group and most are on the highest paying sig campaigns.
I don't want you to believe anything. They are bogus to you and a particular group of envious assholes out here. These are the same kind of people who begrudge that early adopters of BTC got rich. These are the kind of people that just won't do anything useful themselves but will try to bring down those who actually do. You think there is a merit cycle which is observable??
Fucking bullshit!! People like you and Visipilio wax eloquent and misguide newbies in believing that odds are stacked against them in the forum. Fuck you all.
Show me one guy in there that you think does not deserve merit?? You think LoyceV doesn't?? You think Lauda doesn't?? Or suchmoon doesn't?? Do you have any fucking idea how much work it takes to put up a setup where you can reliably scrape comments, merit history and come up with all that data and present it. How much work it is to maintain a reliable escrow business with the level of OpSec so you can be trusted not to be hacked?? How much work it is to try to put some semblance of decentralized authority on the forum following all the rules, reading both sides of the argument and unbiasedly maintaining a persistent stand. Look at people like iasenko, mikeywith (mining section), Heisenberg_Hunter, ncl50c, Hhampuz. What kind of coding work have YOU done, if any??Just crying here like babies all day, all night about how those who only want to be negative don't get merit and signature campaigns. What a fucking joke!! You guys have an axe to grind even against the likes of nullius. Have you even wondered how much effort must go into making those posts, in contrast to ramblings from the like of you, or even me??? To you, What nullius writes may seem like rambling because he is speaking AGAINST you, but he puts references, anchor points, Memes, GIFs what not, into humungously long-ass posts. His technical posts are on another level. If you think there are some undeserving merit holders in that,C'mon, lets point them out..
I'll tell you the most that you can point to is people like me. I only try to be constructive towards the bitcoin ecosystem in general. I read on the latest about bitcoin. Sometimes, I get involved in the drama and write extensive posts like this one based on my own interpretation of what a meritocracy should look like. Sometimes i get frustrated about merit. Sometimes i make posts about how you have to be continuously involved to get merit. Yet, I don't go and try to spread conspiracy theories about people who have 2000 merit while I only have something like 300ish. I don't think i deserve 1000 merit just because i agree with these people. I think the day i find enough time and knowledge to contribute to the actual bitcoin ecosystem and then start documenting it here, I WILL get those merits. I have no desire to get into some "lucrative" campaign ASAP.
It is natural for me to think that merit/ money/ recognition/ DT1 etc are not the end-all, be-all of my presence here. Those are simply the side-effects of doing good work and that is how I want them to be. It is envious, lazy people who prefer to be negative and focus on conspiracy theories. The forum is chock full of members who have "observably and demonstrably" contributed to the forum and reached legendary as well as DT1, DT2. Look at the recent additions from Indonesian and filipino locals. Unfortunately, there also are people who want to be extra smart by farming merit, using alt-accounts, calling their uncles and cousins and everyone to put their greedy beaks into this forum to earn bounties and "lucrative" signature campaigns. And when they get called out for it, instead of taking it up with staff or the person who tagged them, they try to teach everyone about justice, unity, equality, morality.
Fuck you all politicians. The world is not fucking equal. The people who KNOW code, understand bitcoin security, wallet code are not at the same as level as these cry-babies who cannot write one complete sentence in coherent English or differentiate between bubble-sort and merge-sort. Yes, good english unfortuantely, is a requirement to understand most of modern science (unless you are Japanese or Korean, another set of God-level races, I don't count Chinese in there because they are fucking IP thiefs).
You are all just negative, envious haters who shy away from putting effort in actually contributing. People like you just want to convince themselves and others that
"Others are not better than me, Its just they have an unfair advantage".I don't think there is a racial motive for excluding Turkish members but simply the current colluding group fear the cohesion of the turkish community.
Ohh yeah?? Thanks for your confirmation. Now tell your own young padawans and these people you seem to support, to stop misguiding newbies in their own locals. Its no use trying to get some kind of revolution going against an "enemy group" here on the forum that all Turkish members have to unite against.
There is no good reason to exclude some of the better turkish posters. I certainly would not accept they are less trustworthy than the likes of marlboroza , thepharmacist or any other of these willful scammer supporters.
There are some very undeniably greedy members on chipmixer.
Nobody thinks they are less trustworthy except for the ones who tend to go off the rails when an issue is raised against them. I would be very happy to see anyone from there get into the campaign if they have good enough quality. A negative trust against a person should not be taken as some sort of war on ones personal worth. If you have done nothing wrong, it can always be sorted with the person concerned. The whole "Turkish" issue has arisen out of the trust ratings of
just one or two people. Instead of settling it with those who gave it to them, they want to slyly project this as some sort of DT1 conspiracy to hold power.
Why don't these people have glaring positive trust from their own community involving transactions of tens of BTC if they are as trustworthy as they claim to be???As far as members being greedy on CM are concerned, that is also your personal judgement. I have seen several people who don't post 50 posts. The ones who do are mostly those actually contributing to the forum and spending significant time here. If you think they are just doing it for the sake of it, several of them keep getting removed.
In any case, What the fuck is the big deal about Chipmixer campaign??? Its a fucking advertisement which pays well. It is not supposed to be some sort of stamp of approval that the CM campaign members should have to strive to fulfill all the time. By its very nature and due to Darkstars_ judgement, there are some very good members there.
I would suggest doing more research you are only new here young grasshopper.
Never seek to label important truths as drama. That is untrustworthy.
Never seek to lecture on greed specifically if you wear a gambling sig.
Please don't be condescending. I may not have followed the drama but it is easy to judge your "beliefs" and "thought process" from the kind of people you guys have targeted in your posts. I have seen enough of this jealous, envious kind in real life. The kind who just want to chip away on an existing structure rather than try to build something themselves. I can only LOL at your stupid attempt to chastise me for "wearing a gambling sig". Its a fucking advertisement. By that logic, there should be no endorsement of alcohol/ cigarettes/ cold drinks etc etc for their potentially dangerous effects and those who do it should hang their heads in shame.
,