It seems that most altcoin project devs are only after making money through projects rather than the safety of investors and the project security cause just in a short span the number of DeFi that was hacked is huge.
If this continues DeFi may lose the trust of crypto market finance enthusiasts.
Topic: DeFi hacks [history] - page 15. (Read 19477 times)
The Vee.Finance landing platform was attacked by an unknown hacker, as a result, the attacker withdrew 8804.7 ETH and 213.93 BTC worth approximately $35 million. https://veefi.medium.com/vee-finance-accident-announcement-5e75ff197da6
All services were suspended. We are investigating the cause, please follow our official accounts for the latest updates reported on the project's twitter.
Combining link information in 1 postAll services were suspended. We are investigating the cause, please follow our official accounts for the latest updates reported on the project's twitter.
VEE FINANCE 8804.7 ETH and 213.93 BTC ( $35M)
21 Sep 2021
https://www.rekt.news/veefinance-rekt/
Exploiter ETH Address: 0xeeee458c3a5eaafcfd68681d405fb55ef80595ba
Exploiter AVAX Address: 0xeeeE458C3a5eaAfcFd68681D405FB55Ef80595BA
"The exploiter’s Ethereum address was funded via TornadoCash in three lots of 10 ETH: ONE, TWO, THREE.
The funds were then bridged to Avalanche, where the attacker swapped 26.999006274904347875 WETH.e for 1,369.708 AVAX via Pangolin."
Didn’t makerdao get hacked at some point?
The Vee.Finance landing platform was attacked by an unknown hacker, as a result, the attacker withdrew 8804.7 ETH and 213.93 BTC worth approximately $35 million. https://veefi.medium.com/vee-finance-accident-announcement-5e75ff197da6
All services were suspended. We are investigating the cause, please follow our official accounts for the latest updates reported on the project's twitter.
All services were suspended. We are investigating the cause, please follow our official accounts for the latest updates reported on the project's twitter.
There is only one defect among them that hurt me, the defi was pancakebunny. I was getting my Yield revenues with bunny, after the hack, the price went down and it hurt me. Defi, I knew that there were too many hacks, there are projects in this list that I have not heard before, a good list has been prepared.
pNetwork - a cross-chain DeFi platform was attacked on Binance Smart Chain, losing 277 bitcoin (over USD 12 million).
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
pNetwork Protocol -$12M
https://decrypt.co/81301/defi-bridging-protocol-pnetwork-suffers-12-million-hack
DeFi Bridging Protocol pNetwork Suffers $12 Million Hack
An unknown hacker has exploited a bug in pNetwork’s codebase to steal 277 Bitcoin from the protocol's bridge on Binance Smart Chain.
pNetwork - a cross-chain DeFi platform was attacked on Binance Smart Chain, losing 277 bitcoin (over USD 12 million).
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
pNetwork Protocol -$12M
https://decrypt.co/81301/defi-bridging-protocol-pnetwork-suffers-12-million-hack
DeFi Bridging Protocol pNetwork Suffers $12 Million Hack
An unknown hacker has exploited a bug in pNetwork’s codebase to steal 277 Bitcoin from the protocol's bridge on Binance Smart Chain.
Uniswap when BZRX launched their IDO but when reading the article the author explained how the guy earned 500k usd but not by hacking but combining defi trading bot. It is very important to give real information people. People think that decentralized finance doesn't have any risks! But it's quite the opposite. It is a new industry, new code, no one has tested for long so be careful. Thank you very much for sharing the important information needed.
pNetwork - a cross-chain DeFi platform was attacked on Binance Smart Chain, losing 277 bitcoin (over USD 12 million).
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
Right after the attack, pNetwork offered a clean bounty of USD 1.5 million if the hacker returned the funds.
The hacker withdrew 864.8 ETH something more than $3 million from the NFT auction)on the MISO IDO platform of the SushiSwap protocol by introducing malicious code into the external interface of MISO and spoofing the auction address. Chief technical officer SushiSwap Joseph Delong reports on Twitter. Hacker's transaction ID: https://etherscan.io/address/0x3ddd8b6d092df917473680d6c41f80f708c45395#internaltx
https://twitter.com/josephdelong/status/1438839165873967107
"100 ETH has been returned to the Sushi multisig. Hoping the attacker sends the rest
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4bfd68aaaaad03d0dd2d5b9e862e3bc4c7ee90cb85507eb85262e932c8748521"
https://twitter.com/AppletonDave/status/1438854505332764672
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x904e5bcb5ef9cfb19f19afd04849f3b12d17dc347d3e525072fcd139cc08cbdb
https://twitter.com/josephdelong/status/1438861783599652868
"All funds returned"
https://twitter.com/skymoon_gt/status/1438847456377192450
"I think the biggest hackers are the ones taking positions of short in exchanges right at the moment of the incident or right before. Once all funds are returned, check these individuals/groups as well. Probably they make more money that way!"
https://decrypt.co/81120/sushiswaps-token-launchpad-hacked-over-3m-ethereum
SushiSwap’s Token Launchpad Hacked for Over $3M in Ethereum
The hacker withdrew 864.8 ETH something more than $3 million from the NFT auction)on the MISO IDO platform of the SushiSwap protocol by introducing malicious code into the external interface of MISO and spoofing the auction address. Chief technical officer SushiSwap Joseph Delong reports on Twitter. Hacker's transaction ID: https://etherscan.io/address/0x3ddd8b6d092df917473680d6c41f80f708c45395#internaltx
AFKSystems 12M $
https://twitter.com/RugDocIO/status/1436440660517793798?s=20
"AFKSystems rug update: stolen funds were eventually sent to"
https://etherscan.io/address/0x56eb4a5f64fa21e13548b95109f42fa08a644628
https://twitter.com/ObeliskOrg/status/1436493898180931588?s=20
:1/18 AFK System Hard Rug Postmortem thread :"
Zabu Finance $3.2M
https://slowmist.medium.com/?p=44243919ea29
"Brief analysis of Zabu Finance being hacked
According to the intelligence of the SlowMist Zone, on September 12, 2021, the Zabu Finance project on Avalanche suffered flashloan attack."
https://twitter.com/zabufinance/status/1436844923483869184
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
https://twitter.com/RugDocIO/status/1436440660517793798?s=20
"AFKSystems rug update: stolen funds were eventually sent to"
https://etherscan.io/address/0x56eb4a5f64fa21e13548b95109f42fa08a644628
https://twitter.com/ObeliskOrg/status/1436493898180931588?s=20
:1/18 AFK System Hard Rug Postmortem thread :"
Zabu Finance $3.2M
https://slowmist.medium.com/?p=44243919ea29
"Brief analysis of Zabu Finance being hacked
According to the intelligence of the SlowMist Zone, on September 12, 2021, the Zabu Finance project on Avalanche suffered flashloan attack."
https://twitter.com/zabufinance/status/1436844923483869184
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
As reported on twitter PeckShield Inc. the hacker behind the attack on Cream Finance returned the funds stolen as a result of the recent attack in the amount of 5152.6 ETH.
So far, the most unfortunate incidents seem to be Rune and Poly, although after Poly, Tether confirmed the refund but defi seems to have been taught a lesson in security to improve than. And I suspect cross-chain bridges are a research point for hackers.
DAO Maker -4M
https://twitter.com/TheDaoMaker/status/1433994186446020609
This is the second hack in a month.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x2708cace7b42302af26f1ab896111d87faeff92f#tokentxns
What is wrong with the contract? there must be a solution to avoid such lost. Moreover, it has happened for many times before. I guess they just want to collect investors money without having any responsibility to protect and reserve the funds. Such a disaster. https://twitter.com/TheDaoMaker/status/1433994186446020609
This is the second hack in a month.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x2708cace7b42302af26f1ab896111d87faeff92f#tokentxns
DAO Maker -4M
https://twitter.com/TheDaoMaker/status/1433994186446020609
This is the second hack in a month.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x2708cace7b42302af26f1ab896111d87faeff92f#tokentxns
https://twitter.com/TheDaoMaker/status/1433994186446020609
This is the second hack in a month.
https://etherscan.io/address/0x2708cace7b42302af26f1ab896111d87faeff92f#tokentxns
A phishing attack on the issue of tokens of the NFT-project Aurory Project on the Solana blockchain allowed the attacker to withdraw from the wallets of the victims of cryptocurrency and NFT, according to various estimates, from $500,000 to $1.1 million. https://cryptonews.net/en/1635083/
https://decrypt.co/78355/poly-network-hacker-returns-million
Poly Network Hacker Returns $342 Million
The largest crypto hack in history might have a happy ending after all as Poly Network sees more than half of the stolen funds returned.
https://decrypt.co/78364/poly-network-hacker-says-exploit-was-just-for-fun
Poly Network Hacker Says Exploit Was Just ‘For Fun’
The Poly Network hacker denies evil intent and says they wanted to teach the project a lesson.
Poly Network Hacker Returns $342 Million
The largest crypto hack in history might have a happy ending after all as Poly Network sees more than half of the stolen funds returned.
https://decrypt.co/78364/poly-network-hacker-says-exploit-was-just-for-fun
Poly Network Hacker Says Exploit Was Just ‘For Fun’
The Poly Network hacker denies evil intent and says they wanted to teach the project a lesson.
How convenient to hack platforms for fun, they must not have noticed this is a question of public funds safely and the integrity and trustworthiness of the project in question, it is better they look for other ways of having fun than to mess around with people's investment, I don't see what's funny here especially when the reverse is the case.
Cream Finance-19M
Cream Finance DeFi platform loses $19M in a flash loan hack
https://cointelegraph.com/news/cream-finance-defi-platform-loses-19m-in-a-flash-loan-hack
https://twitter.com/CreamdotFinance/status/1432249771750686721?
"PeckShield specified that the hacker exploited the Amp token by reborrowing assets during its transfer before updating the first to borrow in 17 separate transactions. Providing an example transaction, the security firm stated, “The hacker makes a flashloan of 500 ETH and deposit the funds as collateral. Then the hacker borrows 19M $AMP and makes use of the reentrancy bug to re-borrow 355 ETH inside $AMP token transfer. Then the hacker self-liquidates the borrow.”"
xToken- 4,5M
"On 29 August at 04:43 UTC, a vulnerability in our xSNX contract was exploited. We estimate the loss to holders at $4.5 million. We are incredibly disappointed in ourselves and deeply sorry to our community."
https://medium.com/xtoken/xsnx-post-mortem-666d35071f38
https://twitter.com/CreamdotFinance/status/1432909465104240641
"At approximately 12pm on 31st August (UTC +8), C.R.E.A.M. Finance was exploited for 462,079,976 in AMP tokens and 2,804.96 ETH tokens.
Stolen tokens will be replaced. We will commit to allocating 20% of all protocol fees toward repayment until this debt is fully paid."
C.R.E.A.M. Finance Post Mortem: AMP Exploit
https://medium.com/cream-finance/c-r-e-a-m-finance-post-mortem-amp-exploit-6ceb20a630c5
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
Cream Finance DeFi platform loses $19M in a flash loan hack
https://cointelegraph.com/news/cream-finance-defi-platform-loses-19m-in-a-flash-loan-hack
https://twitter.com/CreamdotFinance/status/1432249771750686721?
"PeckShield specified that the hacker exploited the Amp token by reborrowing assets during its transfer before updating the first to borrow in 17 separate transactions. Providing an example transaction, the security firm stated, “The hacker makes a flashloan of 500 ETH and deposit the funds as collateral. Then the hacker borrows 19M $AMP and makes use of the reentrancy bug to re-borrow 355 ETH inside $AMP token transfer. Then the hacker self-liquidates the borrow.”"
xToken- 4,5M
"On 29 August at 04:43 UTC, a vulnerability in our xSNX contract was exploited. We estimate the loss to holders at $4.5 million. We are incredibly disappointed in ourselves and deeply sorry to our community."
https://medium.com/xtoken/xsnx-post-mortem-666d35071f38
https://twitter.com/CreamdotFinance/status/1432909465104240641
"At approximately 12pm on 31st August (UTC +8), C.R.E.A.M. Finance was exploited for 462,079,976 in AMP tokens and 2,804.96 ETH tokens.
Stolen tokens will be replaced. We will commit to allocating 20% of all protocol fees toward repayment until this debt is fully paid."
C.R.E.A.M. Finance Post Mortem: AMP Exploit
https://medium.com/cream-finance/c-r-e-a-m-finance-post-mortem-amp-exploit-6ceb20a630c5
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
The hacker managed to withdraw almost $25 million during the latest flash credit exploit of the Cream Finance protocol using the error of re-entering the AMP token contract. https://cointelegraph.com/news/cream-finance-defi-platform-loses-19m-in-a-flash-loan-hack
Jump to: