Hey nick5429,
Any update on the 'pendings' from bitcoins-lc and btc-mine? No rush, I know you'll get to it,just wanted to make sure it was still in the pipeline - I've got about 16000 pending from bitcoinslc and btc-mine.
Cheers mate.
Topic: del - page 6. (Read 16660 times)
I decided to try this out today and so far it looks as if it's working just fine. I understand the basic premise of pool hopping, but I'm not sure what the stats are telling me exactly. This line for example:
I read this as: For block 136461 (round is block, right?), I submitted 175 shares to this particular pool at the given time. But what's utility, earned and efficiency?
Code:
Round Time Shares Utility Earned Efficiency Fee
136461 Fri Jul 15 21:20:24 2011 175 352.899 pending
I read this as: For block 136461 (round is block, right?), I submitted 175 shares to this particular pool at the given time. But what's utility, earned and efficiency?
Did a pool get dropped from the stats? My total shares decreased by about 20%.
All the pools are still in the stats. There was a display bug or something for 'total number of shares'; it didn't match the number of shares actually in the database. Now, it's being calculated differently and it does match.
yeap deepbit is working again, but efficiency is only 0.8 
You must've just been mining on deepbit at unlucky times. Long-term, deepbit efficiency is ~1.2 
wow , so bitcoin.lc stole yalls money and he calls yall the thieves huh.
...
He relented....
wow , so bitcoin.lc stole yalls money and he calls yall the thieves huh.
Did he ban hopping in his TOS anywhere?
I guess it isnt a lot because yall dont seem to have pitchforks out, but thats a really shitty dude. I dont have a problem with him banning yall, that is his right but he should pay for work done unless he specifically said this would happen in his TOS, which doesnt sound like the case.
If it was any money at all, I would have a lawsuit against him.
Did he ban hopping in his TOS anywhere?
I guess it isnt a lot because yall dont seem to have pitchforks out, but thats a really shitty dude. I dont have a problem with him banning yall, that is his right but he should pay for work done unless he specifically said this would happen in his TOS, which doesnt sound like the case.
If it was any money at all, I would have a lawsuit against him.
Deepbit sais earned 0.0000000 since Fri Jul 8 11:56:22 2011 until now.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=1H36TPKaYcqDUK4CAN9PbaTGNB8ShJtYRN
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=1H36TPKaYcqDUK4CAN9PbaTGNB8ShJtYRN
Yeah, I had thought the deepbit 0's thing was just some weird flaky artifact of rewards processing that would go away soon. Turns out it's an actual problem.
I worked out a retroactive fix, but I need to take deepbit out of the rotation and wait until tomorrow to roll it out. I'll need to take the pool down for about 15 minutes while I process the fix tomorrow. For the weird 0'd shares, I *think* the fix will be 100%, but it might cause share count to fluctuate slightly.
Future deepbit blocks should be able to process without an issue.
Deepbit sais earned 0.0000000 since Fri Jul 8 11:56:22 2011 until now.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=1H36TPKaYcqDUK4CAN9PbaTGNB8ShJtYRN
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=1H36TPKaYcqDUK4CAN9PbaTGNB8ShJtYRN
I've replaced btcmine with bitpit in my hopping They're new and would probably appreciate the hash boost, they're proportional and personal pool data is easily api accessible. I wonder if multipool would work better if it took advantage of personal api data? Might be easier than html scraping.
After re-red this thread and re-checking my stats, btcmine is missing from 1. July till 7. July.
and after do some math, it should be 22000 and not 12.000. I got .58 bitcoins with 12.000 shares out of my 380 MHash/s (180 and 200) running not both all day but one at least 20 hours/day on average and the other at least 12 hours/day on average. It should be much more, just running them one day on a normal pool i get arround .20 bitcoins.
I hope the shares will show up somewhere on your btcmine stats.
Greetings
Mike
and after do some math, it should be 22000 and not 12.000. I got .58 bitcoins with 12.000 shares out of my 380 MHash/s (180 and 200) running not both all day but one at least 20 hours/day on average and the other at least 12 hours/day on average. It should be much more, just running them one day on a normal pool i get arround .20 bitcoins.
I hope the shares will show up somewhere on your btcmine stats.
Greetings
Mike
I'm also thinking I might remove BTCMine (and after all that trouble of getting it working... :-/).
They use a score-based system, and Multiclone must be using the wrong magic number to determine whether mining there is profitable or not -- the several spotchecks I've done have shown BTCmine actual efficiency<1, despite Multiclone predicting its utility to be around 1.1 - 1.2. Though, thinking about it, that could just be because all the BTCmine transactions (with a lower difficulty) were processed after the most recent difficult increase. I'm not certain how that factors in to Multiclone's efficiency calculation. I guess a few more days' testing (with a new worker account) might be in order.
I should try to get eligius working again too, now that it's back up and stable... I haven't checked, but I'm hoping the web interface didn't change much!
They use a score-based system, and Multiclone must be using the wrong magic number to determine whether mining there is profitable or not -- the several spotchecks I've done have shown BTCmine actual efficiency<1, despite Multiclone predicting its utility to be around 1.1 - 1.2. Though, thinking about it, that could just be because all the BTCmine transactions (with a lower difficulty) were processed after the most recent difficult increase. I'm not certain how that factors in to Multiclone's efficiency calculation. I guess a few more days' testing (with a new worker account) might be in order.
I should try to get eligius working again too, now that it's back up and stable... I haven't checked, but I'm hoping the web interface didn't change much!
p.s. what does the "utility" element means in the tables?
Utility is what Multiclone expects the efficiency to be. Efficiency is the actual efficiency, compared to not hopping (after block is found, confirmed, paid out). Hello Nick,
thanks for payout!
I still got more then 10.000 pending shares.
But in the poollists, there are just the shares from bitcoin-lc pending, they dont sum up to 10.000.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=17L8TsmgcaJowgpuYBzMx9iXUfiQxCVv4T
Where are the other pending shares?
And: I will not hurry you, i just wonder about what happens if i start mining on your pool. I would, but if not all (most, >95%) of my shares will come payed over time i will ask again for them and what happend to them. So do you want me (us) mining on your pool right now or should i mine somewhere else for some time?
Greetings
Mike
thanks for payout!
I still got more then 10.000 pending shares.
But in the poollists, there are just the shares from bitcoin-lc pending, they dont sum up to 10.000.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=17L8TsmgcaJowgpuYBzMx9iXUfiQxCVv4T
Where are the other pending shares?
And: I will not hurry you, i just wonder about what happens if i start mining on your pool. I would, but if not all (most, >95%) of my shares will come payed over time i will ask again for them and what happend to them. So do you want me (us) mining on your pool right now or should i mine somewhere else for some time?
Greetings
Mike
Hum. Just looked at the code; that's a little strange. The total (with pending) is just some number stored in the database. All the other info on your user stats page is generated based on the detailed round/share/etc history for each pool in your account history. I have a fix in place on my test server that generates all the data directly from the database, so the numbers will add up correctly. It also adds a 'pending' row for each pool.
This means your total (with pending) will display a lower number, but it appears that the lower number is the right number. I'll probably roll that out to the production server tonight.
edit: Feel free to mine on Multiclone! Anyone and everyone is always welcome
Hello Nick,
thanks for payout!
I still got more then 10.000 pending shares.
But in the poollists, there are just the shares from bitcoin-lc pending, they dont sum up to 10.000.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=17L8TsmgcaJowgpuYBzMx9iXUfiQxCVv4T
Where are the other pending shares?
And: I will not hurry you, i just wonder about what happens if i start mining on your pool. I would, but if not all (most, >95%) of my shares will come payed over time i will ask again for them and what happend to them. So do you want me (us) mining on your pool right now or should i mine somewhere else for some time?
Greetings
Mike
thanks for payout!
I still got more then 10.000 pending shares.
But in the poollists, there are just the shares from bitcoin-lc pending, they dont sum up to 10.000.
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=17L8TsmgcaJowgpuYBzMx9iXUfiQxCVv4T
Where are the other pending shares?
And: I will not hurry you, i just wonder about what happens if i start mining on your pool. I would, but if not all (most, >95%) of my shares will come payed over time i will ask again for them and what happend to them. So do you want me (us) mining on your pool right now or should i mine somewhere else for some time?
Greetings
Mike
http://multiclone.us.to:18080/user/?address=1NsaaKvSycS1Q5ZqesAMGHViEeA5zkkWLc
i saw that bitcoin-lc is out of the pool rotation
also deepbit and slush have the worst efficiency!
p.s. what does the "utility" element means in the tables?
i saw that bitcoin-lc is out of the pool rotation
also deepbit and slush have the worst efficiency!
p.s. what does the "utility" element means in the tables?
Thanks for bringing the bitcoins-lc issue to more light, guys. Thanks to you all, he unfroze the account and I managed to get the payout we earned. It still might take me a bit to process the bitcoins-lc shares, but the pool has the coins and I have the relevant data saved.
Fixed an issue preventing deepbit conversion, and sent out another round of payments tonight. The deepbit rewards code seems to do something weird where it'tal display 0 reward for newish rounds for a while in the stats, but they seem to eventually convert to proper rewards.
Fixed an issue preventing deepbit conversion, and sent out another round of payments tonight. The deepbit rewards code seems to do something weird where it'tal display 0 reward for newish rounds for a while in the stats, but they seem to eventually convert to proper rewards.
Jump to: