Pages:
Author

Topic: delete - page 3. (Read 8448 times)

newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
September 21, 2011, 05:19:46 PM
#51
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
September 21, 2011, 04:12:58 PM
#50


5Gh/s is a start, but it really needs to go back over 100GH/s to be taken even slightly seriously. To get that kind of support, we cannot rely on the old v1.04 client. I asked for the v1.04 source to be released without the special license provisions, and my Solidcoin forum account was banned. I am still in favor of forking the original Bitcoin source again, and just continuing the Solidcoin chain, and calling it Solidcoin v3.0.

The Bitcoin source is all that is tried and true, so I say we just stick hard to that. No unsafe freestyle coding like that idiot RealSolid is doing. He just makes shit up as he goes without really thinking about it. To make things worse, he talks about ways he has solved certain problems, but then you check the source code and realize he lied about the whole thing.

You can solo mine just as well since the Gh/s is so low. You will get a couple blocks a day. Personally, I've stopped mining Solicoin completely. In a couple weeks, if the difficulty is low enough, I might go back to it.

https://github.com/jackjack-jj/soldcoin
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
September 21, 2011, 03:52:19 PM
#49
5+ G/s is mining solidcon so it is not "shut down" or "discontinued" or what ever this bozo tandem of Coinhunter/RealSolid is telling you.

Start mining and lets get this show on the road.  Smiley

Can you recommend me a pool?

5Gh/s is a start, but it really needs to go back over 100GH/s to be taken even slightly seriously. To get that kind of support, we cannot rely on the old v1.04 client. I asked for the v1.04 source to be released without the special license provisions, and my Solidcoin forum account was banned. I am still in favor of forking the original Bitcoin source again, and just continuing the Solidcoin chain, and calling it Solidcoin v3.0.

The Bitcoin source is all that is tried and true, so I say we just stick hard to that. No unsafe freestyle coding like that idiot RealSolid is doing. He just makes shit up as he goes without really thinking about it. To make things worse, he talks about ways he has solved certain problems, but then you check the source code and realize he lied about the whole thing.

You can solo mine just as well since the Gh/s is so low. You will get a couple blocks a day. Personally, I've stopped mining Solicoin completely. In a couple weeks, if the difficulty is low enough, I might go back to it.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
September 21, 2011, 01:31:17 PM
#48
"SOLID COIN VERSION 1.04 TO CONTINUE"

Good idea.
5+ G/s is mining solidcon so it is not "shut down" or "discontinued" or what ever this bozo tandem of Coinhunter/RealSolid is telling you.

Start mining and lets get this show on the road.  Smiley

Can you recommend me a pool?
sr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 250
September 21, 2011, 10:18:03 AM
#47
I thought Solidcoin had a minimum time for difficulty adjustment. 
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
September 21, 2011, 12:11:56 AM
#46
Difficulty adjusts every 240 blocks. There's still 140 blocks to go before the difficulty can come down. That could take another week or two. And even then it'll only drop to 1/4 what it currently is now.

Well that explains why I only found 1 whole block today. I'll go back to mining it in a couple weeks.

Let's fork Bitcoin again and base it off the old Solidcoin block chain. Fuck it, why not? SC2.0 copies the coins from the old block chain. It doesn't move them. Everyone who decides to use both will now have 2x the coins. Infact, let's just call it Solidcoin 3.0. Not having that idiot RealSolid involved is a clear upgrade.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
September 20, 2011, 07:07:07 PM
#45
Didn't Solidcoin have sooper diff adjust ?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
September 20, 2011, 06:55:34 PM
#44
Didn't Solidcoin have sooper diff adjust ?
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
September 20, 2011, 06:53:43 PM
#43
I have a question.  Why is the difficulty so high?  Why am I not able to mine amazingly fast?  Confirmations are coming in very slowly. 
Difficulty adjusts every 240 blocks. There's still 140 blocks to go before the difficulty can come down. That could take another week or two. And even then it'll only drop to 1/4 what it currently is now.
sr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 250
September 20, 2011, 06:15:19 PM
#42
I have a question.  Why is the difficulty so high?  Why am I not able to mine amazingly fast?  Confirmations are coming in very slowly. 
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
September 20, 2011, 04:36:05 PM
#41
RealSolid (aka CoinHunter) has started claiming that the migration to v2.0 is optional. In my last post on the Solidcoin forums I said I wanted to support the old blockchain. I asked for the v1.04 source to be released without any of the special license provisions that were added. My post was deleted and my account banned. I guess that's a no.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Firstbits: 12pqwk
September 19, 2011, 03:23:55 AM
#40
I won't be touching solidcoin still but I support this idea!
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
September 19, 2011, 12:30:45 AM
#39
This talk of actually throwing power behind a 1.04 fork is kind of dumb IMO.

SC is going to get crushed under the titanic weight of CoinHunter's own hubris.

Best to just let it die.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
September 17, 2011, 07:35:45 PM
#38
I have solid commitments from several former Solidcoin exchanges and pools that they will adopt the new client that our team is building to support the original SC block chain. Your new chain will not be recognized and the SC 2.0 fork will just another invalid fork. With no exchanges or pools, you have no future. Your 1000 inserted blocks is invalid. yes people love you that much.
Several former Solidcoin exchanges? To my knowledge there were only bitparking, moonco.in, ruxum, solidcoin24 and btc-e. Bitparking is not doing it. Moonco.in is highly unlikely. I can't see Ruxum being keen on doing an alternate currency again. So that leaves solidcoin24 and btc-e. What other former exchange were there?
Solidcoin24 is also highly unlikely due to Julian's choice of the "official" solidcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
September 17, 2011, 07:12:03 PM
#37
I have solid commitments from several former Solidcoin exchanges and pools that they will adopt the new client that our team is building to support the original SC block chain. Your new chain will not be recognized and the SC 2.0 fork will just another invalid fork. With no exchanges or pools, you have no future. Your 1000 inserted blocks is invalid. yes people love you that much.
Several former Solidcoin exchanges? To my knowledge there were only bitparking, moonco.in, ruxum, solidcoin24 and btc-e. Bitparking is not doing it. Moonco.in is highly unlikely. I can't see Ruxum being keen on doing an alternate currency again. So that leaves solidcoin24 and btc-e. What other former exchange were there?
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
September 17, 2011, 07:13:12 AM
#36
So, then came the FBI and shuts down the servers...
P2P blockchain is the most powerful tool that we have today to play a alternate currency that is impossible to these fuckers (FBI/US Gov/etc) to shutdown it.

Wrong Thiago, my draft is even more resilient to that than the existing blockchain. It's P2P too, doesn't have a X Mb blockchain, however have a small Mb shared (replicated) database used to bootstrap the protocol.

Eg. The nr. of needed banks to validate a transfer must be a % of the existing banks, as anyone can set up a bank at home, this number keeps changing so this central db keeps updating the bank-list and yet to be validated xfers.
What makes it more resilient than the blockchain is that it's normally smaller and faster to spread.

But bottom line, is the P2P replication which makes bitcoin resilient, not exactly "this" blockchain.



OT:

After CoinHunter came up playing God, now BCX is playing Jesus by attempting to resurrect the dead and rotten solidcoin.

This makes me wonder: Who will play the Holy Spirit to close the Trinity of Solidcoin?
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
September 17, 2011, 05:37:34 AM
#35
+1 well said sir.
YTMND of the week!


Just my humor opinion, reading from your posts, both are experts technically and also in entrepreneurship.  Look at the popularity of Solidcoin when it was first launched.  Why not join forces and give us a tamper proof new generation Solidcoin instead at being at odds which each other? Smiley

Because I want a true open source system run by the community and he wants a coin he controls, scams and is the central authority of.

You are not "the community". You are a Troll, willing to destroy what other people created with their hard work.
Also you are trying to take Control over SolidCoin - its not yours and you will Fail.
The Heart of the Solidcoin community is #solidcoin at freenode - you are not welcome there, everybody hates you.
Oh come on - where is this hard work? Seriously where is it?
And ... here's something new for you too look up: "Open Source"

There really isn't much effort involved in bug fixing the bitcoin software especially when you know exactly what the bug is.
Come on, this place is full of programmers, if you aren't one yourself you really need to stop making a fool of yourself by praising something false.

Also, it's hard to be against BCX in this argument when he is the one advocating what Bitcoin is all about and CoinHunter is totally against the Bitcoin community.
... and that is a statement of fact, no fallacy at all - he is against the Bitcoin community.

At least understand what Bitcoin is about - coz it IS about open source and decentralisation and CoinHunter is CLEARLY against that.

Which is also why I think you SolidCoin votaries (yes I chose that word specifically) should just leave and go praise your God in your own forum.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
September 17, 2011, 05:13:51 AM
#34
Just my humor opinion, reading from your posts, both are experts technically and also in entrepreneurship.  Look at the popularity of Solidcoin when it was first launched.  Why not join forces and give us a tamper proof new generation Solidcoin instead at being at odds which each other? Smiley

Because I want a true open source system run by the community and he wants a coin he controls, scams and is the central authority of.

You are not "the community". You are a Troll, willing to destroy what other people created with their hard work.
Also you are trying to take Control over SolidCoin - its not yours and you will Fail.
The Heart of the Solidcoin community is #solidcoin at freenode - you are not welcome there, everybody hates you.
+1 fuck off BitcoinEXpress, before I call Apple you clown.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 506
September 17, 2011, 04:29:54 AM
#33
Okay guys please book a hotel room and just get it over with.

No one wants to hear your drama. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
September 17, 2011, 03:56:50 AM
#32
Just my humor opinion, reading from your posts, both are experts technically and also in entrepreneurship.  Look at the popularity of Solidcoin when it was first launched.  Why not join forces and give us a tamper proof new generation Solidcoin instead at being at odds which each other? Smiley

Because I want a true open source system run by the community and he wants a coin he controls, scams and is the central authority of.

You are not "the community". You are a Troll, willing to destroy what other people created with their hard work.
Also you are trying to take Control over SolidCoin - its not yours and you will Fail.
The Heart of the Solidcoin community is #solidcoin at freenode - you are not welcome there, everybody hates you.
Oh come on - where is this hard work? Seriously where is it?
And ... here's something new for you too look up: "Open Source"

There really isn't much effort involved in bug fixing the bitcoin software especially when you know exactly what the bug is.
Come on, this place is full of programmers, if you aren't one yourself you really need to stop making a fool of yourself by praising something false.

Also, it's hard to be against BCX in this argument when he is the one advocating what Bitcoin is all about and CoinHunter is totally against the Bitcoin community.
... and that is a statement of fact, no fallacy at all - he is against the Bitcoin community.

At least understand what Bitcoin is about - coz it IS about open source and decentralisation and CoinHunter is CLEARLY against that.

Which is also why I think you SolidCoin votaries (yes I chose that word specifically) should just leave and go praise your God in your own forum.
Pages:
Jump to: