Topic: delete - page 2. (Read 8448 times)

1) Coinhunter made a chain, shut down the chain, made a new chain, pregened a million coins, and taxes miners. Sure does sound like the "stable" BTC alternative!
2) BitX has already said that wasn't him on your forums.  Sorry you got trolled so hard.
3) DoubleC is a grown person who understands the risks he takes.  Unlike other SC proponents who run to CH to be babysat. Gee, let me mine harder to pay back the stupid fucks who put all their SC/BTC in with a dude with no credibility. No no, I don't need any kool-aid too.
4) We went 'head to head'.  You already lost.

Thanks for playing.

johnj

do you think doubleC made money when his exchanges were closed down by bitcoin express?

do you have a comment with any content? we can go head to head if you can actually form a thought.

How about the people who had their coins locked away from them, so they couldnt trade? You know you can make more money trading than mining?


It isnt koolaid to recognize reality. besides go look for the thread who has a bigger ego bitcoinexpress or coinhunter... bitcoinexpress wins by a land slide, so more people agree with me.

besides he is planning to restart up his attack on namecoin and has threatened bitparking that he is going to take them down as well.

yeah koolaid man.

You might just want to actually look in your cup, as that isnt brew in there.

Bwuahahaha.  That's classic.

Did they double-dose your kool-aid?

is supporting  a man who costs people a ton of time and money to feed his pathetic ego, the right thing to do either?


no not coinhunter.. btcexpress.


Now their is a huge conflict on interest letting him stay on the forums as he develops his own coin while attacking the others.


How many times are we going to let him attack the largest best exchange for the alternative currencies?

Is coinhuner's support a good thing now?

Quit with this "voluntary" bullshit. No where in the shutdown post did it say it was voluntary. I asked on the Solidcoin forum for the v1.04 source to be released without license restriction, and my post was promptly deleted and my account banned.

No, it wasn't voluntary.  It's already been addressed umpteen times that it was and is mandatory.  CH has threatened to 'no longer support' anyone who still uses the first chain, like SC24.

Indeed. the "Shut down" such as it was, was purely voluntary. You are free to use 1.04 blockchain if you wish and always have been, but there are no exchanges set up to trade your coins on that chain so you will have a hard time doing anything with them. Also that chain has a very low hash rate and is vulnerable to 51% hashrate attacks and time travel attacks exactly the same as Bitcoin is, so I would not recommend using it with people like Dan threatening to attack it.

In 2.0 the chain is new and a completely different hash from the old chain, but if you held an address on 1.04 you will receive a balance of coins equal to what you had on the previous chain, so it is effectively a continuation of your Solidcoin balance from block 35250.

Isn't Coinhunter going to re-issue coins based on block 35,250?  Therefore, any trades after that block will be reversed?  I think that's what he means by "once SC is up again."

What do you mean by "once SC is up again"? SLC network is up at the moment. You can transfer and mine the coin right now.




 
 

Actually which is the correct version that should be used once SC is up again?  1.04 or 2? 

Old news ... keep up with the times

Hold on hold on.

Why hasn't the "Community" thrown YOU out yet?

Do you still plan to attack Namecoin, an established alt blockchain, just because you feel like it or was that just complete bullshit?

You said that after that you would come after Solidcoin. I guess one way to do that would be to try to confuse users into thinking the old chain was still valid and stop them using the new chain, but um. Good luck with that.

Your claim that you are going to develop a new version of Solidcoin and somehow pull a "couple of devs" out of thin air is laughable enough, but then you say to make your new coin you are going to hack the old blockchain and remove certain blocks? Have you thought through the consiquences of these actions? Have you any idea how much of a douchebag you seem when you say stupid shit like this? Clearly not or you wouldn't be posting here.

Also you claim to be able to "take a site off Google" by "talking to your friends from work". Pure fantasy. You don't have any friends or a job, let alone at Apple. Sheesh. Why some other idiots on this board (maybe your other accounts?) are eating up your garbage and why your account on here is still active I couldn't really say, but it's pretty funny to read your posts I guess...

You want to hear the ideas? Here's one, grow the fuck up and stop being a compulsive liar and all-around asshole.

CoinHumper, beating you in a bullshit spreading on shit a sandwich is hard. He needs to really work on this.


 

Yeah it's Friday and still not taken off google.... what's up with BitcoinExpress?   I wonder how many lies this guy needs to tell before some people realize he is full of hot air, mostly due to his overclocked Geforce 2MX mining army.

Steve, is it you buddy?

2 way to go about it. Fix 1.04 or write a new one.
I am not a programmer so I can not help you. You need to talk to jackjack. He fixed some of the RealSolid's shit in this version.
I think it still needs a so called "time travel" fix but the code is readily available. Can someone apply the fix and set a new version to... 1.05?

Damn, it's based off Solidcoin again.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announce-new-solidcoin-client-fully-open-source-41345

Is this based off the Solidcoin source, or the Bitcoin source? I highly suggest using the Bitcoin source. You don't want to get caught up with RealSolid's bullshit license additions. Also, 0.3.25 is beta. If you want to be taken seriously, stick with the stable version.

The way RealSolid rapidly releases bug ridden garbage is shameful. I would never trust my money to unreliable crapware. Let's not repeat this idiot's mistakes.