Topic: delete - page 13. (Read 113473 times)

Not everybody feels the need to spend their life trolling a shitty message board mate.

I am not sure that this is the correct thread for you to be debating the merits/lack thereof of AUR. You can go to BCX's other thread for that. This is about whether or not a 51% attack occurred and was successful. Many pools did seem to be reporting various network diffs and the existing blocks but now all seem to be in sync. I am not sure what the hell that all means but it certainly looks better than it did. Is it possible we are looking at a failed attack? Even so is there actual damage done? Given that BCX has not chimed in I am starting to think there is now no news, but I await a post to see what is claimed next. The coin does appear to be fine right now. I wonder if a black hat tried to attack AUR I wonder if they would be too embarrassed to take credit.

I'm not sure this is even worth replying to.

Everyone was told it was 50% premine up front, that's the entire point of the coin.  I don't think you know what the word "scam" means.  It's only a scam if the developer is stealing coins from the premines, and most signs point to that not having happened to this point.  As it is, it's perfectly clear how the coin is set up.

No one is being forced to spend any money buying coins or mining this currency.  No one is forced to speculate, though they may choose to if they would like.  Personally, while it's possible the coin declines in value, as I said, I think the potential is worth it.  If you don't, then don't touch it, simple as that.

But like I said, this thread is one giant FUD-filled derail, so continue to so if you'd like.

So like I said, at this point in time, the coin is fine.

lol hilarious you are delusional.. your saying a coin that had pretty much the largest premine in all of Altcoin history "will be just fine" ?
in other words a lot of people will see the scam as what it is.. it's going no where. besides why should i care about supporting a premined clone for Iceland ?
coins get posted om exchanges the price starts out high then it tanks and mining profitability dies off and people wander away.

sorry but most of you don't know how this all works and have no clue what patterns repeat endlessly..
a lot of potential my god damn ass lol
gimme a break

dumb little contrarians deserve to lose their money and don't i say i never warned you gullible scammer puppets..

reality is far more profitable then bs propaganda

so you registered 4 days ago and have made 4 comments ? hmmmm
new user scam pumper / ponzi defender ? shell account puppet no. 837465665628478278472874872487 here at Bitcointalk forums lol

At the moment, the coin is perfectly fine.  This thread is basically a train wreck.

It's main risk now is that the misinformation spread will lower it's value so that it will be susceptible to a real attack.  The coin simply needs to regain some confidence and it should be fine.  There's no guarantee, but assuming it recovers there is a lot of potential.

then? it died this bastard? or it still breathing? (i've lost 2 BTC on AUR) 

What about pow/pos coins simply having more hash is not enough to destroy the coin then is it?  Is the old chestnut that you need 51% of the coins also to attack it true?  i read something on another thread by someone who seemed to know what he was talking about saying that you do not need 51% of the coins at all to attack a pow+pos coin?

I know pos coins bring their own set of issues but do they add a layer of protection or not? 

How many ways are there to attack the chain... 51% forcing a fork of the chain,  timewarp ?,  what other weaknesses do these coins have?

A hard cap coin could never be a currency back in the day when we didn't have blockchains and programmable money. But now we do.

Ultimately we will be constrained and limited by silicon wafer production and manufacturing capacity (TSMC/IBM/That AMD spinoff).  

However, the difference between SHA2 vs SCRYPT is that per square mm, you can produce WAY more hash power on SHA2 than on scrypt (or scrypt N).  

Which is why in theory it will be MUCH harder to do this with SCRYPT than on SHA2... of course someone would have to do a real back of the envelope calculation on what the wafer capacity is per year to really say for sure..

That is what p2pool is for.

Hence the wondering which coins have the most p2pool nodes running.

-MarkM-

Sorry to clarify, when i say solo mining, i mean mining on an independent node.  Not necessarily literally solo mining.

So each pool would count as a separate "solo" node.  And thus the more distributed the pools are, the better protection there is.  And the more choice people have to distribute across these pools, instead of large ASIC farming operations (which we know exists), the better.

I am not sure about this, "Every bigger government agency or bank is able to destroy Bitcoin by building a shitton of ASICs." but, I would think that the Chinese government could pull it off easily.

Or any other coin, yes, even the purportedly ASIC-proof ones.

That is why it is so important to focus, to get such a massive amount of ASICs deployed that even a government would find it hard to deploy enough to attack it.

-MarkM-

Since when was there a hard cap on gold?

I have a question. Some handicaped like this, does he feal embarassed after failing so hard once again or does he not realise this, in his dream world?

I am sorry for his family, who have to deal with him in RL.

May BCX's children be born without assholes.

Every bigger government agency or bank is able to destroy Bitcoin by building a shitton of ASICs.

Was that guy really trying to claim Dogecoin was created as a way to extract wealth from people's pockets?  I mined it on day 1 and literally nobody was interested in mining it, so the difficulty was absolutely nothing.  You'd think a "scam" designed to make as much money as possible would have a lot of hash power on it.

Hahahahahaah THIS.

In all honesty i would feel the same.. facts are facts.
I have trashed on CENT from day one and also traded it a lot too making some good money as i stated on IRC etc many times.
I have also repeatedly mentioned that i think once a coin gets thrown up on all the exchanges it's to late too try and stop it and it's fair game.
BUT, at what point to we try and stop some of these from getting supported ? (BEFORE they go on exchanges)

but ya you did give me a tip and had my finances not been tied up and on the tight side these days i might have acted on it.
I try though who else can say that ? How many guys have given in completely to supporting and defending any and all coins no matter what ?

It was the same routine for Max coin with me i knew damn well there was no conceivable way in hell i could stop it nor did i have the algo data.. yet.
It was leaked the day before launch pretty much.. when i posted online asap that it was a useless copy and paste clone.
Guys took Quark and removed the other algo's and more specifically it was copied from Blake coin. I posted the hashing algo specs etc on IRC
i traced back to Quark and it was literally copied and pasted (not rewritten) and i could show the exact Quark build it was taken from easily.
BUT.. who else cared ? i didn't see one guy make a comment in any way shape or form about all that on any of the dozen sites i was watching
 i was the only one and as usual i feel like pretty much the only guy standing by myself keeping these deceitful corrupt greedy scammers
accountable to their stunts and games and bs antics they pull all day every day.
The rest of you mostly scream "Take My Money" and brag about dem Lambo'z and fumble over each other double clicking wallet or miner .exe to flash mine asap.
and often get infected with malware because of it too. hahaaa

There is a clear distinction between a guy who mined some Doge to make some money vs the Doge tards that have roamed across the web
spamming every site they can posting nonsense, wild claims luring in people with outright false information usually to prop up the bags their holding.
This has become an epidemic across the globe i have seen thee scummy dirt bags on all kinds of web sites NOT crypto related in anyway.
The assertion that Doge coin is coin #3 of the Big three is spitting on every coin devs (REAL coin DEV's) face around the world that bent over backwards working on legit coins.
And we can say, oh well, uhh uhh, but but and mine these scams but sooner or later its going to catch up with us and i think it already has..
You guys will vanish accepting no responsibility at all for any of it.. just pass that buck as hard and as fast as you all can.

In the mean time we have rewarded the scammy asshole that made Doge etc and motivated them to make more, LOTS more !
(they seen their clone scam reach new levels of popularity i guarantee they did not expect) =  bad behavior rewarded in a pay out equivalent to winning the lottery.
Hand out a shit loads of free crack to the homeless and watch as they come back.. with a another scam coin and another and another.. it's ridiculous bs.

What is sad is i think i have yet AGAIN posted this info because of a response showing some of you still don't get it and must not have heard me say it all last time lol
And is what i just said crazy ? or is it all rather rational thinking and stuff that *should go with out saying ?
Why do i have to explain to kids why they shouldn't eat cake for breakfast lunch and dinner every day ? are we *overall mostly THAT dumb here ? really ?