This is one really amusing thread BCX. Keep making me laugh 
indeed! Alt chains rule....decentrliazation, P2P, and entertainment!!!!!!
Topic: delete (Read 4920 times)
This is one really amusing thread BCX. Keep making me laugh
Quote from: laniegrace
@Julia
You are very correct about the one or two post spamming that occurred. I had an employee that got a little wild and took to heart a little too strongly the rules of “Gorilla Tactics”. Kaley Wu aka Kaley222 and is in fact a real person.
[...]
I am an Ebay Corporate Partner, the higher level of the EPN Program and have been in the top 300 earners of that program for the past five years straight.
You are very correct about the one or two post spamming that occurred. I had an employee that got a little wild and took to heart a little too strongly the rules of “Gorilla Tactics”. Kaley Wu aka Kaley222 and is in fact a real person.
[...]
I am an Ebay Corporate Partner, the higher level of the EPN Program and have been in the top 300 earners of that program for the past five years straight.
I've openly admitted about 20 times I here I ran a blog I posted as Lanie Grace LOL..
Wait, so to summarize:
You are Dan Maddox, a man, and you are working at Apple.
You are Lanie Grace, a woman, who is working as an independant SEO and Ebay partner, and therefore not working at Apple.
You are Kaley Wu, a woman, who is an ex employee of Lanie Grace.
Lanie Grace (who is you) said Kaley Wu (who is you) was her employee.
Therefore you are a man and a woman, working at apple and not at Apple, and who is both Kaley Wu and her former employer at the same time.
I see only three reasonable explanations:
1) You have lied one or several times about your identity
2) You are schizophrenic
3) Both
I don't even see the point of your challenge.
Even if you are not bluffing this time, who cares?
Whoever you really are, that won't change the fact you lied about other identies.
I liked it better when you were DoSing altcoins.
At least that was interesting.
Still mining TBX and FBX?
schrodinger's cat.
meow.
meow.
Quote from: laniegrace
@Julia
You are very correct about the one or two post spamming that occurred. I had an employee that got a little wild and took to heart a little too strongly the rules of “Gorilla Tactics”. Kaley Wu aka Kaley222 and is in fact a real person.
[...]
I am an Ebay Corporate Partner, the higher level of the EPN Program and have been in the top 300 earners of that program for the past five years straight.
You are very correct about the one or two post spamming that occurred. I had an employee that got a little wild and took to heart a little too strongly the rules of “Gorilla Tactics”. Kaley Wu aka Kaley222 and is in fact a real person.
[...]
I am an Ebay Corporate Partner, the higher level of the EPN Program and have been in the top 300 earners of that program for the past five years straight.
I've openly admitted about 20 times I here I ran a blog I posted as Lanie Grace LOL..
Wait, so to summarize:
You are Dan Maddox, a man, and you are working at Apple.
You are Lanie Grace, a woman, who is working as an independant SEO and Ebay partner, and therefore not working at Apple.
You are Kaley Wu, a woman, who is an ex employee of Lanie Grace.
Lanie Grace (who is you) said Kaley Wu (who is you) was her employee.
Therefore you are a man and a woman, working at apple and not at Apple, and who is both Kaley Wu and her former employer at the same time.
I see only three reasonable explanations:
1) You have lied one or several times about your identity
2) You are schizophrenic
3) Both
I don't even see the point of your challenge.
Even if you are not bluffing this time, who cares?
Whoever you really are, that won't change the fact you lied about other identies.
I liked it better when you were DoSing altcoins.
At least that was interesting.
Everything is explained here
i have..um...1 btc bounty?
Can someone fill me in? what did I miss?
alright, doesn't matter.
alright, doesn't matter.
Everything is explained here
Can someone fill me in? what did I miss?
alright, doesn't matter.
alright, doesn't matter.
Can someone fill me in? what did I miss?
alright, doesn't matter.
alright, doesn't matter.
Notice how the SoiledCoin sockpuppets revert to name calling after they can no longer dispute the facts. 
I wonder if the rumor that a tyrant node private key was stolen is true.
It would be interesting to see the SoiledCoin blockchain fight with itself.
I wonder if the rumor that a tyrant node private key was stolen is true.
It would be interesting to see the SoiledCoin blockchain fight with itself.
+1 I'll start development of it now...
Notice how the SoiledCoin sockpuppets revert to name calling after they can no longer dispute the facts.
I wonder if the rumor that a tyrant node private key was stolen is true.
It would be interesting to see the SoiledCoin blockchain fight with itself.
I wonder if the rumor that a tyrant node private key was stolen is true.
It would be interesting to see the SoiledCoin blockchain fight with itself.
why dont we open up 20 threads about your scams, bcx?
BitchcoinEXpress is a G.I.R.L.*
*Guy In Real Life
*Guy In Real Life
Malicious is calling spendable coins unspendable in the first place
There was thread that showed the "Enforcer Nodes" in fact has spent coins
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/solidcoin-spending-trusted-nodes-66284
Apart from that CH/RS has admitted to being able to spend them... but won't, he promises...
Malicious is calling spendable coins unspendable in the first place
Hey moron,
I've openly admitted about 20 times I here I ran a blog I posted as Lanie Grace LOL..
Once again if you're so sure I'm not who I am, then simply agree to the challenege, no BTC involved...
What's the issue?
I've openly admitted about 20 times I here I ran a blog I posted as Lanie Grace LOL..
Once again if you're so sure I'm not who I am, then simply agree to the challenege, no BTC involved...
What's the issue?
Yeah so we already have it on record that you've lied about your identity before and that you pretended to be a woman you weren't. Thanks for putting it on the record.
By the way your childish stunt of proving you are "Kyley Wu" works how? How do you prove you are that person exactly? Why don't I just get one of my girlfriends to say they are me, look, now I'm a woman too!! I'd actually be surprised if you knew any women though, unless of course you bought a new one recently.
Stop dodging and accept the challenge or STFU forever.
If realsolid had been a scammer, he'd cashed out within the first 3 weeks. When 1 SC was 0.03BTC, and there was a market volume > 200k on bitparking. Instead he sat down, reacted to threats, changed a lot in the networking of solidcoin, and released SC v2(and soon v3). Sorry, but putting much hard work into a scam after you missed the opportunity to cash out big just doesnt sound practical for a scammer.
There is a difference between the volume of bids and asks, and the volume of trades. The trade volume of SC2 was always thin, now it is non-existent. You can move the price by trading a few BTC or USD for SC2. Since miners get almost zero rewards for finding a bock, the only people with significant amounts of SC2 right now are the founders. If they don't sell, the market is not liquid and thus no price discovery takes place.
Regarding RealSolid's "work": There was no pre-mine before SC2, so he could not have cashed out in SC1. Nobody here had an issue with SC1 being a scam. The only issue was that it had security flaws that required it be shut down. SC2 had the pre-mine and the tyrant nodes which guarantee double spending can happen as long as the tyrants bless the spend. Lots of people had an issue with that. RealSolid has not yet had an opportunity to cash out his 12 million SoiledCoins (or double spend the CPF into oblivion) because there have never been buyers out there for that sort of volume. So SC2 limps along.
The brand is so toxic at this point, nobody is likely to dump serious cash into it. Even if it was part of a pump and dump.
LOL Soiledcoins....haha yup u got it right!
Exactly. Who decides what is malicious and what is not? Coinhunter does. So if you label use of Helvetica font in a client malicous, you can revoke the license of anyone using Helvetica font. You could cite it dilutes the SoiledCoin trademark(not that you need to cite anything at all). You certainly could revoke someone's license to fork if it prevented you from spending the pre-mine to "protect" SoiledCoin.
One of the clauses should specifically state adding new coins or adding code to spend those 10 trust accounts *IS* malicious otherwise what is the point of it?
Perhaps what is malicious will be more clearly defined too, instead of actually helping improve that definition that you'd rather just spend hours of your life criticizing it. You must value your time.
The point of the tyrant nodes and the proprietary license is for you to maintain complete control of the block chain. You are the only person who can define what you consider to be "malicious" at any given point in time. Since you cannot even take responsibility for your posts on these boards (nor will you sign them with a tyrant node key) who actually cares what "malicious" means to you today? Tomorrow you will have a different name and sing a different tune.
Releasing a client that prevented you from spending the pre-mine to "protect" SoiledCoin would be both "malicious" and competing coin activity. You wouldn't even need to revoke the license, you could just use the tyrant nodes to force all those clients off the network. You wouldn't even need to spend the pre-mine, you could double spend the CPF with the tyrant nodes blessing your double-spend transactions and rejecting others.
Like I said before, the license should be changed so that adding new spendable coins is malicious and then releases the project from that license so others can fork it. They would just need to create new trust account keys and they could have their own SolidCoin network that all existing exchanges and businesses would accept.
I've offered that suggestion to RealSolid and he seemed to think it was good but we will have to wait and see on what happens to it as it is mostly his code.
Again, talking about yourself in the third person is bizarre. The first thing that should stop is you lying about your identity. I can dredge these boards for dozens of posts where you refer to yourself as the founder of Solidcoin in the first person. Transparency starts with the founder. If you are indeed not RealSolid, then why were you claiming to be the founder of Solidcoin? If you were lying then, why should we trust anything you say now? If RealSolid was posting as you, why did he stop? Why can't he do what Gavin does and sign his messages so we know they are authentic.
The Coinhunter account has had more actors than Dr. Who. Almost as much fantasy and as many bizarre plots too.
Edit: fixed quotes
@Coinhunter
Will you accept the challenge as outlined in the OP?
Will you accept the challenge as outlined in the OP?
Since your original post is impossible to prove no. Secondly why would I want you banned? You start more SolidCoin threads than I do, I want you to keep posting because it helps promote solidcoin and also because your posts make us SolidCoin supporters laugh.
Remember your geforce2mx army? lol.
Jump to: