delete - page 118. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Come-In-Behind

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:24:12 PM

Quote from: ajaxgeorge on September 21, 2014, 12:13:45 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:12:24 PM

Quote from: Come-In-Behind on September 21, 2014, 12:06:41 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:56:42 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis.

dear god. can we just setup a webcam so you guys can whip them out and see who's is bigger & drop the facade?

geez

He and smooth et al also said it was following a FUD cycle and had bottomed at 380. Then we went below 300.

True, but I'm sure they hadn't(as neither could any of us) taken into account this whole situation arising with BCX. That in itself(along with Bitcoin in it's bearish state) caused the further price fall.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: ajaxgeorge on September 21, 2014, 12:13:45 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:12:24 PM

Quote from: Come-In-Behind on September 21, 2014, 12:06:41 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:56:42 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis.

dear god. can we just setup a webcam so you guys can whip them out and see who's is bigger & drop the facade?

geez

He and smooth et al also said it was following a FUD cycle and had bottomed at 380. Then we went below 300.

Sorry I know they know everything. Very sorry I don't speak facts.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: tacotime on September 21, 2014, 12:10:35 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:07:12 PM

Your mathematicians didn't address that r_s = q_s - c_sx mod l is also known, where _{q_s} is unknown.

q_s is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

So sure are we. Subtraction may play differently in modular arithematic. I will wait to see what your memo says.

ajaxgeorge

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:12:24 PM

Quote from: Come-In-Behind on September 21, 2014, 12:06:41 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:56:42 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis.

dear god. can we just setup a webcam so you guys can whip them out and see who's is bigger & drop the facade?

geez

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: Ultros on September 21, 2014, 12:09:53 PM

Quote from: nexern on September 21, 2014, 11:20:10 AM

evolving language and behaviour pattern confirm and follows a simple social attack without substance.
monero devs should calm down and switch to a more attentive path. there is no need to play into others prepared hands.

Quoted for emphasis. Devs, take care of yourself and your sanity. Any forum can entrap you, but this one is full of malevolent people that constantly try to pick fights so they can reveal your weak-points.
Be careful not to get pulled. There's so much desire to harm on this thread it seems it has a physical form.

Well said brother

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Come-In-Behind on September 21, 2014, 12:06:41 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:56:42 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

Indeed and he deserves credit for that along with 1000s of others. But that wasn't a short-term trading analysis, and it wasn't based on any need to know nuances about a complex technical issue.

Hunyadi

legendary

Activity: 1281

Merit: 1000

☑ ♟ ☐ ♚

Quote from: tacotime on September 21, 2014, 12:10:35 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:07:12 PM

Your mathematicians didn't address that r_s = q_s - c_sx mod l is also known, where _{q_s} is unknown.

q_s is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Did you see TT just deleted his post Wink

Anonymint edited his post, so I had to address the edit.

Yes, and I deleted mine.

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 12:07:12 PM

Your mathematicians didn't address that r_s = q_s - c_sx mod l is also known, where _{q_s} is unknown.

q_s is unknown (and random) which makes the above equation more or less useless for solving for x, this will be addressed in a later memo.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Did you see TT just deleted his post Wink

Anonymint edited his post, so I had to address the edit.

Ultros

sr. member

Activity: 471

Merit: 250

Quote from: nexern on September 21, 2014, 11:20:10 AM

evolving language and behaviour pattern confirm and follows a simple social attack without substance.
monero devs should calm down and switch to a more attentive path. there is no need to play into others prepared hands.

Quoted for emphasis. Devs, take care of yourself and your sanity. Any forum can entrap you, but this one is full of malevolent people that constantly try to pick fights so they can reveal your weak-points.
Be careful not to get pulled. There's so much desire to harm on this thread it seems it has a physical form.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2014, 11:54:49 AM

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."

Your mathematicians didn't address that r_s = q_s - c_sx mod l is also known, where _{q_s} is unknown.

Sorry I know you know everything.

Come-In-Behind

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:56:42 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

Impressive.

I also recall rptiella being the same guy that bought bitcoin at $10.

NewLiberty

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1002

Gresham's Lawyer

Trolling 101:
This is the message you can send if you get any response.
If you don't get a response, keep going, but add that they are unresponsive and uncaring.
Cycle as needed.

Quote from: Bobsurplus on September 21, 2014, 11:23:00 AM

Yeah wtf? These devs are here arguing and crying like babies. This is totally unprofessional.

Why would anyone want to invest in a bunch of hotheads?

binaryFate

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Still wild and free

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2014, 11:54:49 AM

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."

Admirable simple proof.

RAJSALLIN

hero member

Activity: 665

Merit: 500

When bitcoin was in its infancy and experiencing some of its first bug exploits do you think Satoshi was whining about not getting payed, how the project wasn't his whole life and he rather spend time on the beach with his wife? As core developers you are suppose to believe in the project so much that you see the extreme potential and the coins you hold on to from the beginning will eventually be worth so much that it will compensate you for all your hard work.

bobbyb

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:16:43 AM

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2014, 10:47:10 AM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 09:43:10 AM

Quote from: dEBRUYNE on September 21, 2014, 09:30:50 AM

EDIT: Maybe you could discuss the fix with one of the other core members (or rpietila), I think most of them appreciate what you're doing here.

None of them take me seriously. I am tired of this shit.

You are missing the part where I spent hours (and little sleep) with you going over your work on Sybil attacks and the part (which I posted several hours ago) where I said that I thought you had improved on our work. Very odd.

If you want to offer assistance, it is welcome. If you don't want to help, don't. Either way we could do with a little less drama.

I rather fancy the idea of publishing the sender of (most) every ring signature on the block chain instead at a future date of my choosing.

I warned you don't fuck with me.

I will make sure BBR has the mitigation ready assuming they are still cooperative with me and they don't give my mitigation to XMR.

You are not dealing with BCX any more. You are dealing with me. Capice.

I didn't saw that coming.
This thread is gold.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: TheFascistMind on September 21, 2014, 11:47:23 AM

Rpietila wrote publicly only 4 - 8% chance of any lasting harm to Monero.

The same guy who said Bitcoin wouldn't fall below $400 twice and I am the same guy who PUBLICLY predicted both times it would.

And my group got out at $485 and bought back in below $400 because in the $500s I told them it would go below $400 again to retest the prior bottom.

Edit: If BCX doesn't attack successfully, Rpietila will be correct, for a short time.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Analysis of simultaneous equations attack on CryptoNote

"...that implies that no such attack, as outlined above, is possible against CryptoNote protocol."

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

I'm 97% sure this is just FUD.

You know everything.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Cryptobro on September 21, 2014, 11:51:13 AM

you're the one who appears to be 'on the rag' right now.

You know everything.

TheFascistMind

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2014, 11:46:23 AM

Which allegation? He never alleged any Sybil attack issues at all.

You know everything. He never mentioned anonymity being lost.

Quote from: smooth on September 21, 2014, 11:46:23 AM

you found nothing

Well I am sure you are sure. And so we can stop now.

Topic: delete - page 118. (Read 165547 times)