delete - page 30. | Bitcointalksearch.org

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on October 06, 2014, 08:31:23 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 08:12:24 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 08:02:43 PM

So with out further a do here is your leaders grand Monero wisdom..

If you are referring to reptilia he has no leadership role with Monero. He runs the MEW group he started and is essentially a user group, but other than that he is just a user like anyone else (though certainly a vocal and opinionated one, for better or worse).

Seriously, ROFL

rpietila IS Monero

You are confused. Monero is an open source project i.e. https://github.com/monero-project. rpietila doesn't even have access to the repo, nor would he have any idea what to do with it if he did. (Nor does he have access to any of the other project assets, such as the 'monero' btct user, web site, domain names, etc.)

He's a user and self-appointed promoter.

If Mark Karpeles shows up here and starts telling everyone who he can get to listen to him how great Frappuchinos are, and how anyone and everyone should start drinking five Frappuccinos per day, that does not make him Starbucks, or a leader of Starbucks, or a spokesman for Starbucks.

robinwilliams

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Re: The Monero Free For All Thread

Here - let me fix ur post smooth

Quote from: xulescu on October 06, 2014, 07:36:49 PM

Quote from: rangedriver on October 06, 2014, 06:30:14 PM

Good point. Everyone please ~~stay~~ stray on topic. This is strictly a free for all thread.

slowclap.wav

Quote from: smooth on September 01, 2014, 11:33:47 PM

Please try to stay on topic.

slowclap.wav

BitcoinEXpress

legendary

Activity: 1210

Merit: 1024

delete

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 08:02:43 PM

So with out further a do here is your leaders grand Monero wisdom..

If you are referring to reptilia he has no leadership role with Monero. He runs the MEW group he started and is essentially a user group, but other than that he is just a user like anyone else (though certainly a vocal and opinionated one, for better or worse).

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: coinits on October 06, 2014, 06:42:59 PM

Quote from: nioc on October 06, 2014, 03:31:14 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 02:34:53 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Did you happen to read the title of this thread?

Do you realize that it was created by a non supporter of Monero?

Do you understand the premise of this threads creation?

Do you realize that these posts that you consider "scientific gibberish" are actually some of the most on topic posts there are?

Do you realize that your posts are not only off topic but repetitive? Also your posts seem to me oft times to be the pot calling the kettle black.

It's his modus operandi.

He is a troll. He, by his own admission, received a ban for trolling. I can see why he yaps about excess "scientific gibberish". He is illiterate.

Also, he expects people to dumb things down to his level and not bother to try and learn.

Is there a 'Bitcoin Talk for Dummies' book? Maybe Santa will bring him one.

I said i once in the past got a 5 day ban for trolling but i did not say I WAS doing it ! (big difference)
what was going on is i joined in on a topic posting pictures on the BunnyCoin ANN topic and i guess someone thought i went to far
when i joked around with them i wanted some form of reparations for stealing my coin idea i posted here a year earlier..
i had posted a BunnyCoin Topic one year earlier before the one i was posting pic's on (like everyone else)
I was never told WHY.. so i have to guess why..
I don't feel i was trolling and i think i would know if i was or not.. but i get called one a lot LOL
that is what stupid Shills here do because they are too dumb to carry on an intelligent conversation.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

You guys are stupid and here is your Shill-leader spouting off..

by the way i screen-capped it so he didn't go and edit his topic later pretending he didn't say it *again.
just like he did when i pointed out how he created his first topic here in the altcoin section a few months ago
saying how he was noob and his FIRST Altcoin was Monero !
Which took all of two sentences then he spent the rest of the entire topic discussing his self-moderated (noob) nazi topic rules..
which i will of course post below for your reading pleasure and LOL'z his deleted comments Wink

Noob.. moron.. Shill extraordinaire ROFL

So with out further a do here is your leaders grand Monero wisdom..

That douche's Nazi rules..

Quote

The rules of this thread are very strict, as always in my threads:

- There is no freedom of speech. The topic is altcoins, but I also want that it stays in a level that is possible and interesting to read for a busy Bitcoin holder that does not care about alts. I know how it feels to be a busy Bitcoin holder, so I steer the discussion to the maximum benefit for me, and for my readers.

- Which alts can be discussed, is up to me. Mentioning an alt after that specific alt has been banned from a thread results in a ban for you. If you do not obey my ban from the thread, historically you have had 100% chance to be banned from the forum as a result. Don't try your luck.

- Posts may be deleted for whatever reason. Deletion does not necessarily mean that the post was offensive. It may also have been too long quote (in which case either the original, or the reply may be pruned), repetition of yours or somebody else's point, or anything else.

- Moderating actions are written in red. Others are not allowed to use red.

xulescu

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Quote from: rangedriver on October 06, 2014, 06:30:14 PM

Good point. Everyone please stay on topic. This is strictly a free for all thread.

slowclap.wav

Quote from: smooth on September 01, 2014, 11:33:47 PM

Please try to stay on topic.

slowclap.wav

coinits

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1019

011110000110110101110010

Quote from: nioc on October 06, 2014, 03:31:14 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 02:34:53 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Did you happen to read the title of this thread?

Do you realize that it was created by a non supporter of Monero?

Do you understand the premise of this threads creation?

Do you realize that these posts that you consider "scientific gibberish" are actually some of the most on topic posts there are?

Do you realize that your posts are not only off topic but repetitive? Also your posts seem to me oft times to be the pot calling the kettle black.

It's his modus operandi.

He is a troll. He, by his own admission, received a ban for trolling. I can see why he yaps about excess "scientific gibberish". He is illiterate.

Also, he expects people to dumb things down to his level and not bother to try and learn.

Is there a 'Bitcoin Talk for Dummies' book? Maybe Santa will bring him one.

rangedriver

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 504

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 06:26:10 PM

Quote from: nioc on October 06, 2014, 03:31:14 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 02:34:53 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Did you happen to read the title of this thread?

Do you realize that it was created by a non supporter of Monero?

Do you understand the premise of this threads creation?

Do you realize that these posts that you consider "scientific gibberish" are actually some of the most on topic posts there are?

Do you realize that your posts are not only off topic but repetitive? Also your posts seem to me oft times to be the pot calling the kettle black.

your full of shit.. a lot of what he is creating posts saying has nothing to do with anything to do with the topic.

Good point. Everyone please stay on topic. This is strictly a free for all thread.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: nioc on October 06, 2014, 03:31:14 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 02:34:53 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Did you happen to read the title of this thread?

Do you realize that it was created by a non supporter of Monero?

Do you understand the premise of this threads creation?

Do you realize that these posts that you consider "scientific gibberish" are actually some of the most on topic posts there are?

Do you realize that your posts are not only off topic but repetitive? Also your posts seem to me oft times to be the pot calling the kettle black.

your full of shit.. a lot of what he is creating posts saying has nothing to do with anything to do with the topic.

luigi1111

legendary

Activity: 1105

Merit: 1000

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 04:12:33 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CryptoCarmen on October 06, 2014, 04:07:27 PM

Quote from: Eastwind on October 06, 2014, 03:59:38 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 07:07:00 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

ETA is Oct. 12, 5 days from now.

Is this 22 days for coin with 1 min block time? If a coin has 10 min block time, is it 220 days? A lot can happen during that time.

Would a coin has longer block time less susceptible to this kind of attack? It has fewer orphans.

Is at least 220 days. Some speculate was actually 2200 days.

All wrong, its 22 aeons (1 aeon = 1 billion years) Cheesy

Aeon coin is being attacked too? Is it true ?

I heard they were going to rename it to just Eon coin, and thus avoid attacks by nature of their "professionalism".

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: CryptoCarmen on October 06, 2014, 04:07:27 PM

Quote from: Eastwind on October 06, 2014, 03:59:38 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 07:07:00 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

ETA is Oct. 12, 5 days from now.

Is this 22 days for coin with 1 min block time? If a coin has 10 min block time, is it 220 days? A lot can happen during that time.

Would a coin has longer block time less susceptible to this kind of attack? It has fewer orphans.

Is at least 220 days. Some speculate was actually 2200 days.

All wrong, its 22 aeons (1 aeon = 1 billion years) Cheesy

Aeon coin is being attacked too? Is it true ?

CryptoCarmen

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange

Quote from: Eastwind on October 06, 2014, 03:59:38 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 07:07:00 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

ETA is Oct. 12, 5 days from now.

Is this 22 days for coin with 1 min block time? If a coin has 10 min block time, is it 220 days? A lot can happen during that time.

Would a coin has longer block time less susceptible to this kind of attack? It has fewer orphans.

Is at least 220 days. Some speculate was actually 2200 days.

Eastwind

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 07:07:00 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I said 22 days for it to come through, this is day 11.

ETA is Oct. 12, 5 days from now.

Is this 22 days for coin with 1 min block time? If a coin has 10 min block time, is it 220 days? A lot can happen during that time.

Would a coin has longer block time less susceptible to this kind of attack? It has fewer orphans.

nioc

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 02:34:53 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Did you happen to read the title of this thread?

Do you realize that it was created by a non supporter of Monero?

Do you understand the premise of this threads creation?

Do you realize that these posts that you consider "scientific gibberish" are actually some of the most on topic posts there are?

Do you realize that your posts are not only off topic but repetitive? Also your posts seem to me oft times to be the pot calling the kettle black.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 02:09:28 PM

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

right back to it eh ? LOL

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: rangedriver on October 06, 2014, 01:14:41 PM

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 12:47:24 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

You know things are forked when you (partially) agrees with Spoetnoko Cheesy

That is the first sign of the Crypto-Apocalypse !
First people in the altcoin scene start agreeing with me..

You know when i walk inside someones house their plants start to wither and die.

and Spoetnoko ? damn you guys get creative with your names LOL
that sounds like the name of a car tire brand name hahaha

ya uhhh sooo Monero eh ?
well what about it ?
how in the hell are we still talking about it ?

is acting like a an irritating spamming advertising shills working out for these guys ?
i have never even once looked at Monero market prices so i don't know if their coin is doing good or not.
but i can't imagine all this topic spamming is helping their coin.
I'm guessing sitting here bumping this and other Monero topics non stop would be damaging.
It's not like useful info is being posted.. just seems like a whole lot of bullshit being posted to me..

There's a lot of help out there for you man. All you have to do is make that first step.

you too should read what i have said to the last 3 guys on this topic..
and maybe take your own advice guys ?
you fail at staying even remotely on topic and have veered off into insulting attacks on me
THAT shows YOU are the sick fucking lunatics ...not me kids Cool

feel free to start a Spoetnik is crazy topic if like rather than hijacking this one..

ps:
consider your ass utterly fucking owned

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: Hueristic on October 06, 2014, 01:11:51 PM

Quote from: smooth on October 06, 2014, 01:13:45 AM

...

Quote

Oh my dog, Sputnuts noise is back. Cry

Enjoy the walls of text.

For anyone that reads his crap.

http://lifehacker.com/breakup-splits-walls-of-text-into-paragraphs-1642400700

i didn't bother reading that but i have to admit sometimes i just close my eyes
and then just hammer away hitting random keys on my keyboard hitting the space bar occasionally so it looks like words.. sorry about that

is there anything you wanted to say related to the topic at hand though ?
i am perfectly fine with as much criticism, mocking and insults greedy, childish, inept, Shills can hurl at me.
but..
bear in mind the mods around here may not be as forgiving.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 09:04:01 AM

What is your guess about this vaporware below? Don't worry you won't offend me, just be frank.

Does such a credible and correct unpublished white paper exist? Yes or no?

How the hell do I know? Correct would be especially hard to say if it is unpublished, since that would limit who might be scrutinizing it for errors or unstated (here at least) assumptions.

Quote from: TheFascistMind on October 06, 2014, 02:33:37 AM

Here is a quadruple dose of FUD...

Wouldn't it be ideal if a coin's whitepaper has a mathematical proof that it isn't vulnerable to anything less than a 50% attack (other than the normal 6 confirmations type risk of double-spend)?

And wouldn't it be porn, if that proof showed that every other proof-of-work coin (including Bitcoin) is so vulnerable?

And wouldn't it triple sexy if that proof showed that all (untraceable block chain) anonymous coins can't be fixed to remove that vulnerability?

Excuse my drooling, I can't contain myself.

Edit: I have not withheld any quantification of TW attack on CN afaik. I shared all of my (limited) knowledge on that. I am referring to something different above.

rangedriver

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 504

Quote from: Spoetnik on October 06, 2014, 12:47:24 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

You know things are forked when you (partially) agrees with Spoetnoko Cheesy

That is the first sign of the Crypto-Apocalypse !
First people in the altcoin scene start agreeing with me..

You know when i walk inside someones house their plants start to wither and die.

and Spoetnoko ? damn you guys get creative with your names LOL
that sounds like the name of a car tire brand name hahaha

ya uhhh sooo Monero eh ?
well what about it ?
how in the hell are we still talking about it ?

is acting like a an irritating spamming advertising shills working out for these guys ?
i have never even once looked at Monero market prices so i don't know if their coin is doing good or not.
but i can't imagine all this topic spamming is helping their coin.
I'm guessing sitting here bumping this and other Monero topics non stop would be damaging.
It's not like useful info is being posted.. just seems like a whole lot of bullshit being posted to me..

There's a lot of help out there for you man. All you have to do is make that first step.

Topic: delete - page 30. (Read 165512 times)