Topic: delete - page 62. (Read 165547 times)

An easy target. Useless coin with no hashrate to speak of. Vanilla 51% after DDoSing a few pools would be enough for it.

So how would Risto's 500 finance the attack then? ofcourse BCX would have to use his other BTC to fund the atttack.. he can't use the 500BTC that are in escrow.

Or are you saying that when BCX would have gone "all in" Risto would have taken the bet??

He meant that BCX would probably use his other BTC to fund the attack in order to win the 500 BTC bet

how would that 500BTC finance the attack? it would be put in escrow ofcourse just as BCX his 500BTC
meaning that BCX could use 500BTC less for his atack wich might make him actually weaker.. depending on how deep his pockets are..

I can think of 2 reasons:

1) information asymmetry.  Risto couldn't possibly know what BCX knows and doesn't know. 

2) Risto could have wisely realized that his 500BTC might have financed the attack.  No bet maybe equals no attack.

The ratio of hash rate to price is within the normal range since July or so.

Looks like he's turning his attention to attacking DigitalCoin (DGC) now.

whati  don't get is why risto didn't take the 500btc bet

So whats the deal with BCX? What has he said recently after nothing happened? 

I don't think so.

I called it as I saw it that BCX was just hott air when it came to an actual legitimate exploit to the XMR protocol. Look at his history of "attacking" Litecoin in 2012. Not much different outcome.

You really are butthurt aren't you? lol

"HERO" account means nothing on this forum in terms of status or merit etc.

Are you in your mum's basement now?  

The XMR price is so low, the hash rate is so high. Does it indicate something like active attack is going on?

Going on 10 and 11 days and still nothing from BCX of actual substance concerning the supposed "exploit" and "attack"?

Gee what a surprise... 

Well not really. The CryptoNote team pretty much put the issue to bed declaring that such an attack would be impossible.

Retrospectively it was just a pile of steaming FUD.

There is still uncertainty about the attack.

Do you think it's safe to say that by now we would be seeing a lot more odd blocks if an actual attack was underway?

Did not follow it closely, did the attack happen or not?

XMR price is above 0.003 so I am guessing no attack.

sure.. somebody around here should care about the people being scammed out of their Bitcoin..
i gave up hoping places like Cryptsy would give a fuck LOL

The fact he has a "HERO" account status speaks volumes now don't it LOL
He had that BEFORE he started spamming about Monero too by the way..
And if you dig deeper you will see he talks like other Shill accounts here using terms like "Signal to Noise Ratio" to enforce censorship and CONTROL of his victims he is grooming.
Which obviously tie him to other accounts here that say the same weird thing word for word hahah

It takes a while to get a Hero account.. i don't have one but he does LOL
He just woke up one day and decided it's time to buy into Monero then run around being an evangelist ?
I think he's a fucking liar and he has spent all his time trying to manipulate and control people around here.

So far, I have not seen, nor am I aware that anyone else has seen, any evidence of an attack in progress, and also no specific unaddressed vulnerability to an attack beyond DDoS (which as we all know is mitigated through decentralization).

The image a couple posts above has been analyzed for probabilistic distribution of timestamps... but remember, the in-chain timestamps of that nature wouldn't offer a definitive display of attack capability in this form anyway.  These times are set by the miner that mines the block, and may not be accurate.  They are not required by the protocol to be accurate for good reasons.  

It is even normal to have blocks times stamped out of order in which they are hashed or received (as is the case in the snapshot sample shown where 235645 is stamped a second after 235656).¹  This can happen for many reasons.  NTP failures are common.  It can also be intentionally set incorrectly, but there is no ill effect from this other than that it can confuse some people.  Those times are indicative only.

It would be a different matter entirely if a great number of freshly hashed blocks in a chain were received in rapid succession.  This is no where evidenced in the XMR block chain to date, and nothing else has been offered by way of evidence of a credible threat.


¹ This may be what BCX was pointing to with the sentence: "Check the blocks just prior to the circle."  Do not be confused into fear, by lack of knowledge.  There is no evidence of wrongdoing in this chain sample.