DELETED - page 7. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Lucky7btc

hero member

Activity: 1299

Merit: 502

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lucky7btc on February 19, 2017, 08:36:10 PM

This seems like the same owner of FUN-CASINO. I would avoid this place like the plague

You've already said this 3 times

This seems, like you write comments here to increase your Activity at this forum. Grin

Our answer: No, we do not have any relation to this site.

If you say so, Even your sentence structure are very similar to that of the fun-casino dev. My money is you are both the same...

Lucky7btc

hero member

Activity: 1299

Merit: 502

Quote from: apeman on February 19, 2017, 03:53:33 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: apeman on February 18, 2017, 11:39:52 AM

I don't have any problem with you changing the rule, but it shouldn't be retrospectively applied to old accounts which were created when your rules were different. Besides all of that, i wasn't playing with a bonus when i won, so there isn't really an excuse for delaying payment at all.

apeman, For now you've got 1.7 BTC withdrawal.
You used bonuses few times from one account/acoounts and then won from another. That's why we do not allow multiple accounts.

So you are refusing to pay the remaining 200mbtc?

This seems like the same owner of FUN-CASINO. I would avoid this place like the plague

apeman

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: apeman on February 18, 2017, 11:39:52 AM

I don't have any problem with you changing the rule, but it shouldn't be retrospectively applied to old accounts which were created when your rules were different. Besides all of that, i wasn't playing with a bonus when i won, so there isn't really an excuse for delaying payment at all.

apeman, For now you've got 1.7 BTC withdrawal.
You used bonuses few times from one account/acoounts and then won from another. That's why we do not allow multiple accounts.

So you are refusing to pay the remaining 200mbtc?

Lucky7btc

hero member

Activity: 1299

Merit: 502

Quote from: apeman on February 18, 2017, 11:39:52 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: apeman on February 17, 2017, 03:58:12 PM

As dustboy has pointed out, this isn't what you had previously said in this thread. You retrospectively added this term and changed your post after i had already signed up, deposited and submitted my withdrawal request. I don't buy that this is due to "security monitoring" as my winnings were not even from a deposit which i took a bonus on, i won with a deposit made entirely of my own funds. Yet 6 days later, you still haven't paid up.

For now you've got 1.7 BTC withdrawal. Sorry for delay.
If you lose bonuses got with one account, you will win then with another. That's why we do not allow multiple accounts!

I don't have any problem with you changing the rule, but it shouldn't be retrospectively applied to old accounts which were created when your rules were different. Besides all of that, i wasn't playing with a bonus when i won, so there isn't really an excuse for delaying payment at all.

I see you processed 600mbtc of the 800mbtc that was remaining in my request, but what about the 200mbtc you declined and returned to my account?

I BET THIS IS THE SAME OWNER AS FUN-CASINO!

apeman

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: apeman on February 17, 2017, 03:58:12 PM

As dustboy has pointed out, this isn't what you had previously said in this thread. You retrospectively added this term and changed your post after i had already signed up, deposited and submitted my withdrawal request. I don't buy that this is due to "security monitoring" as my winnings were not even from a deposit which i took a bonus on, i won with a deposit made entirely of my own funds. Yet 6 days later, you still haven't paid up.

For now you've got 1.7 BTC withdrawal. Sorry for delay.
If you lose bonuses got with one account, you will win then with another. That's why we do not allow multiple accounts!

I don't have any problem with you changing the rule, but it shouldn't be retrospectively applied to old accounts which were created when your rules were different. Besides all of that, i wasn't playing with a bonus when i won, so there isn't really an excuse for delaying payment at all.

I see you processed 600mbtc of the 800mbtc that was remaining in my request, but what about the 200mbtc you declined and returned to my account?

Mansch

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

Will try it. Thanx and GL with this project

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: panjul07 on February 18, 2017, 05:22:53 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: panjul07 on February 17, 2017, 07:27:32 AM

This is ridiculous, this requirement is designed to make players lose their deposited money. It should be highlighted on the main page of the site, otherwise players will feel be trapped if they did not know about it before they make deposit.
Much more better, this requirement should be removed.

We accept 1 confirmation for deposits, so yes – you must play a little bit due to higher risk of fraud. It's common practice for BTC gambling sites.

Common practice for btc gambling sites? Can you give me a list of those btc gambling sites that has the same rules/terms with yours in which players need to wager 3x of their deposit before they are able to withdraw?

I'm not sure I understand
You mean that even if you don't take the bonus you need to wager 3* your deposit before withdrawing?

That's not a common practice, that's pure and simple theft Oo

Lucky7btc

hero member

Activity: 1299

Merit: 502

Quote from: panjul07 on February 18, 2017, 05:22:53 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: panjul07 on February 17, 2017, 07:27:32 AM

This is ridiculous, this requirement is designed to make players lose their deposited money. It should be highlighted on the main page of the site, otherwise players will feel be trapped if they did not know about it before they make deposit.
Much more better, this requirement should be removed.

We accept 1 confirmation for deposits, so yes – you must play a little bit due to higher risk of fraud. It's common practice for BTC gambling sites.

Common practice for btc gambling sites? Can you give me a list of those btc gambling sites that has the same rules/terms with yours in which players need to wager 3x of their deposit before they are able to withdraw?

The bottom line is this casino is underfunded. It needs funding so therefore these type of terms are added. It wouldn't surprise me that the owner of this casino is the same as FUN-CASINO. IMHO, I would avoid this one for the time being.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: panjul07 on February 17, 2017, 07:27:32 AM

This is ridiculous, this requirement is designed to make players lose their deposited money. It should be highlighted on the main page of the site, otherwise players will feel be trapped if they did not know about it before they make deposit.
Much more better, this requirement should be removed.

We accept 1 confirmation for deposits, so yes – you must play a little bit due to higher risk of fraud. It's common practice for BTC gambling sites.

Common practice for btc gambling sites? Can you give me a list of those btc gambling sites that has the same rules/terms with yours in which players need to wager 3x of their deposit before they are able to withdraw?

apeman

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

apeman,

We've put some part of your cashout amount on hold, because our security monitoring system detected you playing at least from three different accounts, and you got bonuses with each of them. We advise you and other our players not to use multiple accounts at BitFortune.io.
Your cashout request will be completed in the nearest future.

P.S. It's confusing that almost no one ever writes here on the forum when everything works smoothly. Players get their solid winnings and don't bother to write even a few words here. Wink

Visitors of this topic only see those, who are dissatisfied with service.

As dustboy has pointed out, this isn't what you had previously said in this thread. You retrospectively added this term and changed your post after i had already signed up, deposited and submitted my withdrawal request. I don't buy that this is due to "security monitoring" as my winnings were not even from a deposit which i took a bonus on, i won with a deposit made entirely of my own funds. Yet 6 days later, you still haven't paid up.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: Lucky7btc on February 17, 2017, 06:58:39 AM

Also people please read the terms, if you deposit and don't take a bonus. You are still required to wager your deposit 3X (which is bullshit). If you do take a bonus only slots counts towards wagering (which is bullshit too).

This is ridiculous, this requirement is designed to make players lose their deposited money. It should be highlighted on the main page of the site, otherwise players will feel be trapped if they did not know about it before they make deposit.
Much more better, this requirement should be removed.

apuestascoin

hero member

Activity: 586

Merit: 500

Gambling bitcoin webmaster

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: apuestascoin on February 16, 2017, 10:20:51 AM

Will you launch an Affiliate program?

Yes, sure. Please, contact us directly by personal messages for more details.

PM sent

Lucky7btc

hero member

Activity: 1299

Merit: 502

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: valta4065 on February 16, 2017, 06:48:30 PM

Because contrary to fiat casinos there is no regulation on the house edge of casino slots.
So I'd say that slots on those sites are really not generous! They have no obligation in giving you more than a 50% payback xD

Nope, our games provider is SoftSwiss, one of the best in the industry. We have only genuine games!

SOFTSWISS IS ONE OF THE MOST DODGY SOFTWARE OUT! Also people please read the terms, if you deposit and don't take a bonus. You are still required to wager your deposit 3X (which is bullshit). If you do take a bonus only slots counts towards wagering (which is bullshit too).

michkima

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 514

Great to see new gambling sites popping out. Upon checking you website, though, I felt it was a mobile site and not really for the PC. Was that your original intention? Though I like how simple it looks and seems interesting to see games from famous casinos game makers in your own casino. I'll try it out later. How many confirmations do I need before I see my deposit in the casino?

valta4065

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: BTCevo on February 16, 2017, 05:51:46 PM

Quote from: mOgliE on February 16, 2017, 04:17:43 AM

Quote from: eternalgloom on February 03, 2017, 06:33:34 PM

Quote from: cpfreeplz on February 03, 2017, 06:23:28 PM

You forgot one thing though, is it provably fair? If not you'll have a hard time finding people willing to gamble with their hard earned money on a site where you could literally set the code for you to win all the time or win on any bet over a certain threshold.

Yeah provably fair would be nice, but it's not a deal breaker for most people.
Most of those commercial slot games can't even be provably fair.

OP, even though you're a newbie account, your site looks very good and I'm glad you've implemented anonymous accounts.
I wish you good luck with your casino8

Yeah I agree, provably fair isn't expected on slots games!
Provably fair is a very special feature that is now required on dice game but that's all.
For the rest we got no indication on the house edge. Slots just eat your money anyway xD

Why? We just need some luck on slots games. And more over he give you some good offer on each game. Like i asked last time and we can even sum all of the bonus not like usual site. But i just wondering why they must split it to 2 invoices? Does it really make any sense if this is a part of security? Btw slots games really need some luck, and many of them are already winning like huge amount and even withdrawal but on other site, so i dont really think that slots will always eat up your money unless you are not have enough to play slots Cheesy

Because contrary to fiat casinos there is no regulation on the house edge of casino slots.
So I'd say that slots on those sites are really not generous! They have no obligation in giving you more than a 50% payback xD

BTCevo

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1008

Quote from: mOgliE on February 16, 2017, 04:17:43 AM

Quote from: eternalgloom on February 03, 2017, 06:33:34 PM

Quote from: cpfreeplz on February 03, 2017, 06:23:28 PM

You forgot one thing though, is it provably fair? If not you'll have a hard time finding people willing to gamble with their hard earned money on a site where you could literally set the code for you to win all the time or win on any bet over a certain threshold.

Yeah provably fair would be nice, but it's not a deal breaker for most people.
Most of those commercial slot games can't even be provably fair.

OP, even though you're a newbie account, your site looks very good and I'm glad you've implemented anonymous accounts.
I wish you good luck with your casino8

Yeah I agree, provably fair isn't expected on slots games!
Provably fair is a very special feature that is now required on dice game but that's all.
For the rest we got no indication on the house edge. Slots just eat your money anyway xD

Why? We just need some luck on slots games. And more over he give you some good offer on each game. Like i asked last time and we can even sum all of the bonus not like usual site. But i just wondering why they must split it to 2 invoices? Does it really make any sense if this is a part of security? Btw slots games really need some luck, and many of them are already winning like huge amount and even withdrawal but on other site, so i dont really think that slots will always eat up your money unless you are not have enough to play slots Cheesy

dustboy

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 517

Quote from: ?? on ??

apeman,

We've put some part of your cashout amount on hold, because our security monitoring system detected you playing at least from three different accounts, and you got bonuses with each of them. We advise you and other our players not to use multiple accounts at BitFortune.io.
Your cashout request will be completed in the nearest future.

It is a little bit confusing, you have ever said that multiple accounts is not forbidden by your rules as quoted by joksim299 on this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17765345 but seems that you have just changed/edited your own post because of this issue.
Good thing is that you will still process his remaining withdrawal.

Paecga129

sr. member

Activity: 422

Merit: 250

No free spins yet :-( account name paecga

Quote from: Paecga129 on February 12, 2017, 12:30:02 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Paecga129 on February 09, 2017, 04:19:19 AM

Hi I think you forgot me. :-) paecga

Have fun with your freespins, Paecga129.

I'm not able to access that account. I did the set an email. The account paecga I am able to log into.

apuestascoin

hero member

Activity: 586

Merit: 500

Gambling bitcoin webmaster

Will you launch an Affiliate program?

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: eternalgloom on February 03, 2017, 06:33:34 PM

Quote from: cpfreeplz on February 03, 2017, 06:23:28 PM

You forgot one thing though, is it provably fair? If not you'll have a hard time finding people willing to gamble with their hard earned money on a site where you could literally set the code for you to win all the time or win on any bet over a certain threshold.

Yeah provably fair would be nice, but it's not a deal breaker for most people.
Most of those commercial slot games can't even be provably fair.

OP, even though you're a newbie account, your site looks very good and I'm glad you've implemented anonymous accounts.
I wish you good luck with your casino8

Yeah I agree, provably fair isn't expected on slots games!
Provably fair is a very special feature that is now required on dice game but that's all.
For the rest we got no indication on the house edge. Slots just eat your money anyway xD

Topic: DELETED - page 7. (Read 11337 times)